new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 50/100, with Enter 43/100, Hold 58/100, and Exit 22/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #523 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not override the pool-specific dependence on trading fees, memecoin price risk, and limited evidence on range persistence. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to collapse 25.9%, the position spent materially less time in range, or a durable reward program altered the fee-versus-incentive balance.
Computed 2026-10-21 04:04 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$26.69K
Total value locked
$6.56K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up29.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 24.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range sized for NEET's recent volatility, and set a rebalance or exit trigger when the position approaches the edge of that range or when fee income no longer compensates for the required NEET exposure; verify that 0.25x remains elevated before redeploying.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 29.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 25.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.56K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $18.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 9 neet-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#588 of 4333 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3058 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the neet-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of swap fees, but a large NEET price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool reports 25.9% from trading fees and 3.7% from rewards, for a total APR of 29.6%. 88% means the displayed yield is currently generated by fees rather than incentives. Reward dependency remains unconfirmed, so the fee rate—not a stated reward schedule—should be the basis for evaluating persistence.
shieldRisk Assessment
The pool's recent impermanent-loss reading is represented by N/A, while recent tick occupancy is represented by N/A; neither establishes how consistently a position would have remained productive. As a MEMECOIN pool, NEET-USDC carries sharp price-dislocation risk, and concentrated liquidity can turn that move into inventory imbalance or an out-of-range position. Emission decay is still relevant to exit timing even where current yield is fee-funded: any future incentive program could decline, expire, or fail to offset the cost of remaining exposed to NEET.
tollneet Context
NEET is the volatile asset in this pair, so providing liquidity means accepting exposure to its price relative to USDC rather than holding a neutral dollar position. Liquidity depth for NEET elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; thin external markets or abrupt price moves can increase slippage, widen effective exit costs, and accelerate inventory conversion from NEET into USDC.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the comparatively stable quote asset and provides the dollar reference against which NEET's price is measured. It reduces directional exposure on one side of the pair, but it does not remove the risk that a NEET selloff leaves the LP holding more NEET while a rally leaves the LP holding more USDC and missing part of the upside.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NEET and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You earn a share of swap fees, but a large NEET price move can leave you with a different mix of assets and a lower result than simply holding them.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4J8JyoAg5Qttrnnyox4JioZgmvJ7M2u5fJRH5wwRgLuw
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- neet (Ce2gx9KG…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
APR
3%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool figures attribute the return to 25.9% in fees and 3.7% in rewards, producing 29.6% overall. If future incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time; the fee component would still depend on trading activity.
The current pool figures attribute the return to 25.9% in fees and 3.7% in rewards, producing 29.6% overall. If future incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time; the fee component would still depend on trading activity.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the economic basis for the position. In the current figures, 3.7% is attributed to rewards and 88% is attributed to fees, so an incentive expiry should be assessed against whether 25.9% justifies continued NEET exposure.
The reward portion would fall away, leaving trading fees as the economic basis for the position. In the current figures, 3.7% is attributed to rewards and 88% is attributed to fees, so an incentive expiry should be assessed against whether 25.9% justifies continued NEET exposure.
Risk is high because NEET can move sharply and concentrated liquidity can become inactive or accumulate the weaker asset during a one-sided move. The pool reports N/A for recent impermanent loss and N/A for recent range occupancy, so those indicators should be checked before sizing a position.
Risk is high because NEET can move sharply and concentrated liquidity can become inactive or accumulate the weaker asset during a one-sided move. The pool reports N/A for recent impermanent loss and N/A for recent range occupancy, so those indicators should be checked before sizing a position.
Use a predefined trigger tied to range position, trading activity, and NEET exposure: exit or rebalance when the position nears the range boundary, when 0.25x deteriorates, or when 25.9% no longer compensates for the risk. Emission decay or an incentive expiry is another reason to reassess rather than wait for the displayed APR to persist.
Use a predefined trigger tied to range position, trading activity, and NEET exposure: exit or rebalance when the position nears the range boundary, when 0.25x deteriorates, or when 25.9% no longer compensates for the risk. Emission decay or an incentive expiry is another reason to reassess rather than wait for the displayed APR to persist.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period from the available pool data because recent impermanent loss is represented by N/A and future fees vary with volume. Break-even depends on how long 25.9% remains available, whether NEET returns toward the entry price, and how often the position stays inside its active range.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period from the available pool data because recent impermanent loss is represented by N/A and future fees vary with volume. Break-even depends on how long 25.9% remains available, whether NEET returns toward the entry price, and how often the position stays inside its active range.
