WealthVille
GME
G
Coinomi
C

GME-Coinomion Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $22.06K
APR
2.1% APR
24h Volume
$129.42 24h vol
Pool address
4SsFy3qt…ZmnF · observed 2026-10-26
46D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 57% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter39

new capital

Hold53

keep position

Exit27

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 46/100 produces Enter 39/100, Hold 53/100, and Exit 27/100 signals, with the live verdict HOLD and an ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of 1636 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools places it away from the strongest-ranked group, so Hold indicates monitoring rather than a strong entry signal. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, further volume contraction, or collapse in fee yield, and could improve if sustained trading activity raises fee generation without requiring emissions.

Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$22.06K

Total value locked

$129.42

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

2.1%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 0.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 8287m ago
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 99% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 67/100
tips_and_updates

Use a monitored range rather than a set-and-forget position, and rebalance when the price approaches either boundary or when fee generation weakens materially; exit if the position remains out of range while volume continues to contract.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR2.1%——
Fee APR2.1%——
Volume$129.42——
Fees Earned$1.32——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
2.0%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.5%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
0.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.01x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0001
Fee APR Sustainability
99% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 GME-Coinomi pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1729 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 6% of all Solana pools

overall rank #7640 of 148664

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GME-Coinomi liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing GME and COINOMI into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with more of the token that has fallen relative to the other.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield decomposes into 2.1% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. The current profile therefore depends on swap activity rather than an incentive program. Reward dependency and the persistence of any future emissions are not established, so emission decay and incentive changes should be treated as unresolved variables rather than assumed sources of return.

shieldRisk Assessment

Recent impermanent-loss history is not currently reported, and recent tick-in-range performance is also unavailable, so realized range efficiency cannot be verified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, GME-COINOMI carries sharp price-movement, liquidity, and correlation risk; emission decay can remove any future reward component quickly, making exit timing important if volume or fee generation weakens.

tollGME Context

GME is one side of the pool and its price moves determine how the position inventory shifts between GME and COINOMI. The supplied pool data does not establish GME's liquidity depth elsewhere on Solana, so thin external markets could increase slippage and amplify adverse LP rebalancing when GME moves sharply.

tollCoinomi Context

COINOMI is the other side of the pool and provides the reference asset against which GME's relative price is managed. Its broader Solana liquidity is not established by the supplied metrics; a COINOMI move, or a divergence between COINOMI and GME, can leave the LP holding more of the underperforming token.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing GME and COINOMI into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price changes can leave you with more of the token that has fallen relative to the other.

token

Token Details

GME
GMEGameStopSolana
Explorer

GameStop (GME) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

Coinomi
CoinomiCoinomi wallet$Solana
Explorer

Coinomi wallet$ (Coinomi) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
4SsFy3qti2Srbz2zSpkNDGo3PMV1NZS6szt2U1eRZmnF
Protocol
Orca Whirlpool
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Whirlpool (CLMM)
Token A
GME (8wXtPeU6…)
Token B
Coinomi (EHmZM5QD…)
Created
6/24/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current APR is split between 2.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, only the reward component would decay; fee yield still depends on trading volume and liquidity.

The current APR is split between 2.1% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 99% of yield coming from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced, only the reward component would decay; fee yield still depends on trading volume and liquidity.

Because the current yield profile is fee-funded, expiration of a future incentive would remove only the reward component represented by 0.0%. The remaining return would depend on swap fees, while the pool's MEMECOIN price and liquidity risks would remain.

Because the current yield profile is fee-funded, expiration of a future incentive would remove only the reward component represented by 0.0%. The remaining return would depend on swap fees, while the pool's MEMECOIN price and liquidity risks would remain.

Risk is elevated because GME can experience abrupt price changes and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool has $22K in liquidity, $129 in recent volume, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.01x, so fee income may not fully offset adverse inventory changes.

Risk is elevated because GME can experience abrupt price changes and may have limited liquidity outside this pool. The pool has $22K in liquidity, $129 in recent volume, and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.01x, so fee income may not fully offset adverse inventory changes.

For GME-COINOMI, review an exit when price approaches the range boundary, volume declines, or fee yield falls from 2.1%. A TVL drain, sustained out-of-range position, or weaker liquidity for either token is also a concrete exit signal.

For GME-COINOMI, review an exit when price approaches the range boundary, volume declines, or fee yield falls from 2.1%. A TVL drain, sustained out-of-range position, or weaker liquidity for either token is also a concrete exit signal.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not currently reported and fee income changes with volume. At the current profile, any recovery would have to come mainly from 2.1%, while price divergence between GME and COINOMI could extend the time required.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not currently reported and fee income changes with volume. At the current profile, any recovery would have to come mainly from 2.1%, while price divergence between GME and COINOMI could extend the time required.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights