SOL-GOATon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $24.56K
- APR
- 3.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $484.37 24h vol
- Pool address
- 4kKFykZk…gKdD · observed 2026-10-26
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 62% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, with Enter at 10/100, Hold at 30/100, and Exit at 60/100; the live verdict is AVOID. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #2120 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools, placing it away from the strongest-ranked alternatives without making it an automatic exit. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-only yield and limited recent activity: a TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, weaker volume-to-liquidity conditions, or sustained price movement outside a usable range would change the assessment toward exit, while durable volume growth and deeper liquidity could improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$24.56K
Total value locked
$484.37
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 20.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively managed range centered on the current SOL/GOAT price, and review it whenever price leaves the range or 24-hour volume falls materially below its recent level. Exit if the range remains unused while liquidity or trading activity contracts, since fee recovery would then be less credible.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $484.37 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.45 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 15 SOL-GOAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1400 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #6788 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GOAT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and GOAT into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. Your final amounts can shift toward one token when their prices move, and the pool's current fee income may not fully offset that change.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 3.5% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards. 98% of yield comes from fees, so the current APR does not rely on an active reward program. Reward dependency remains uncertain, and there is no stated time-bound reward balance to support an emissions-based holding thesis.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GOAT carries sharp price-move, liquidity-withdrawal, and correlation-break risks; fee income can fall quickly if trading activity fades. Emission decay is a secondary risk while rewards contribute nothing currently, but exit timing still matters because reduced volume or a weakening market can leave an LP with adverse asset inventory and less fee compensation.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and the larger source of liquidity and market reference for this pair. Its broader liquidity can make the SOL side easier to value and trade than GOAT, but a large SOL move changes the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss for the LP relative to simply holding SOL.
tollGOAT Context
GOAT is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity is likely more concentrated and its price discovery more sensitive to attention and market sentiment than SOL. A sharp GOAT rally or selloff can move the position toward one asset, while declining GOAT activity can reduce the fees available to offset that exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing both SOL and GOAT into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. Your final amounts can shift toward one token when their prices move, and the pool's current fee income may not fully offset that change.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4kKFykZkVqE5wbBgj6o8ddnj5TmA6UQgXJLYzAasgKdD
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GOAT (CzLSujWB…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
41%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay has no current reward APR to reduce because the reward component is 0.1% and 98% of yield comes from trading fees. Future incentives could change the mix, but fee income remains dependent on trading volume rather than emissions.
Emission decay has no current reward APR to reduce because the reward component is 0.1% and 98% of yield comes from trading fees. Future incentives could change the mix, but fee income remains dependent on trading volume rather than emissions.
The current quoted yield already consists of 3.5% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, so expiry of a reward program would not remove the current stated reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on swap volume, pool liquidity, and the resulting fee rate.
The current quoted yield already consists of 3.5% in fees and 0.1% in rewards, so expiry of a reward program would not remove the current stated reward contribution. The remaining return would depend on swap volume, pool liquidity, and the resulting fee rate.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a deeper, less speculative asset because GOAT can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit. Impermanent-loss history and tick utilization are not currently available, so the recent compensation for those risks cannot be verified.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a deeper, less speculative asset because GOAT can move sharply, lose liquidity, or become difficult to exit. Impermanent-loss history and tick utilization are not currently available, so the recent compensation for those risks cannot be verified.
For SOL-GOAT, consider exiting when price leaves the managed range, GOAT liquidity or trading interest weakens, or fee income falls below the level needed to justify inventory risk. A sustained TVL decline or deterioration in the 0.02x activity measure would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
For SOL-GOAT, consider exiting when price leaves the managed range, GOAT liquidity or trading interest weakens, or fee income falls below the level needed to justify inventory risk. A sustained TVL decline or deterioration in the 0.02x activity measure would also weaken the case for remaining in the position.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fees depend on volume. The nominal fee return is 3.5%, but it is an annualized estimate rather than a guarantee that fees will recover losses from SOL-GOAT price divergence.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future fees depend on volume. The nominal fee return is 3.5%, but it is an annualized estimate rather than a guarantee that fees will recover losses from SOL-GOAT price divergence.
