Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 gives this pool a mixed profile: Enter is 10/100, Hold is 30/100, and Exit is 60/100, producing the live verdict AVOID from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #322 among 997 meteora-dlmm pools places it away from the strongest-ranked group, while the fee-only structure supports the current hold view without relying on unverified reward persistence. The assessment would worsen with a TVL drain, lower trading volume, or a collapse in fee APR, and could improve if sustained volume raises fee income while liquidity remains stable.
Computed 2026-08-04 11:45 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$192.78K
Total value locked
$7.01K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up21.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -11.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range only if you can monitor it, and reassess the position when the pool's volume-to-liquidity reading falls materially below 0.04x or when TVL begins draining; those are concrete signals that fee generation may no longer justify memecoin price and range risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 21.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 19.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.01K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $63.20 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 FLUID-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#963 of 2454 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 24% of all Solana pools
overall rank #19000 of 81389
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the FLUID-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing FLUID and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, with part of their fees distributed to liquidity providers. Your holdings can shift toward one token when prices move, and the pool's current return comes from trading fees rather than reported reward payments.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported yield consists of 19.5% fee APR and 2.0% reward APR, with 91% of yield attributed to trading fees. No current reward contribution is reported, so emission decay is not presently reducing the displayed APR; the duration and persistence of any future incentives are not established.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range data are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, FLUID-SOL carries asymmetric token-price and liquidity risks, while fee income can weaken if trading activity fades; any future emissions would also decay, making exit timing important before incentives become less useful.
tollFLUID Context
FLUID is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position, so LP returns depend on both its price relative to SOL and the fees generated while liquidity is active in range. The supplied data do not establish FLUID's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp FLUID move can leave the LP with more FLUID after rebalancing effects and produce impermanent loss versus holding the two assets.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and provides the reference price for FLUID in this pool. SOL price movement affects the position's dollar value and can move the selected liquidity range away from the active market, while the supplied data do not establish SOL-specific liquidity depth outside this pool.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing FLUID and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, with part of their fees distributed to liquidity providers. Your holdings can shift toward one token when prices move, and the pool's current return comes from trading fees rather than reported reward payments.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 4mPKhtkMtRXyQcgSjzog14nnonHowvLhB4fyVkMfSECA
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- FLUID (DuEy8wWr…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown shows 2.0% reward APR and 19.5% fee APR, with 91% of yield from fees. Because no current reward contribution is reported, emission decay is not currently the main source of APR decline, but any later incentives should be treated as temporary unless their duration is confirmed.
The current breakdown shows 2.0% reward APR and 19.5% fee APR, with 91% of yield from fees. Because no current reward contribution is reported, emission decay is not currently the main source of APR decline, but any later incentives should be treated as temporary unless their duration is confirmed.
There is no reported reward contribution at present, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward APR. The remaining return would be the trading-fee component, 19.5%, which depends on future volume rather than emissions.
There is no reported reward contribution at present, so expiration would not remove a currently reported reward APR. The remaining return would be the trading-fee component, 19.5%, which depends on future volume rather than emissions.
Risk is elevated by FLUID's memecoin classification, uncertain liquidity depth outside this pool, and the possibility of rapid price moves that create impermanent loss or move liquidity out of range. Recent seven-day loss and range-utilization history are not reported, so those risks cannot be estimated from the supplied data.
Risk is elevated by FLUID's memecoin classification, uncertain liquidity depth outside this pool, and the possibility of rapid price moves that create impermanent loss or move liquidity out of range. Recent seven-day loss and range-utilization history are not reported, so those risks cannot be estimated from the supplied data.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for FLUID price risk, when TVL is draining, or when volume-to-liquidity falls materially below 0.04x. Also reassess before any incentive reduction, because memecoin liquidity can become harder to exit as emissions decay.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for FLUID price risk, when TVL is draining, or when volume-to-liquidity falls materially below 0.04x. Also reassess before any incentive reduction, because memecoin liquidity can become harder to exit as emissions decay.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and future fee income is variable. As a rough framework, compare the size of the price divergence against 19.5%: the greater the divergence or the lower the realized fee rate, the longer recovery takes and the less reliable an annualized APR estimate becomes.
A precise break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent loss is not reported and future fee income is variable. As a rough framework, compare the size of the price divergence against 19.5%: the greater the divergence or the lower the realized fee rate, the longer recovery takes and the less reliable an annualized APR estimate becomes.
