SOL-LITon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $660.85K
- APR
- 91.4% APR
- 24h Volume
- $174.94K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 5H7c1wUY…xFWt · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 54/100, with Enter at 50/100, Hold at 59/100, and Exit at 22/100; the live verdict is HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the current profile is viewed as better suited to maintaining an existing position than opening aggressively or exiting automatically. Its rank of #1922 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools places it near the middle of the tracked universe, not among the strongest or weakest pools. The assessment would change with a sustained TVL drain, a collapse in trading volume and fee APR, a clearer deterioration in range performance, or a material increase in durable fee activity.
Computed 2026-10-26 21:37 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$660.85K
Total value locked
$174.94K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up91.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 141.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow initial tick range and set a rebalance or exit rule for a sustained SOL/LIT move outside that range; exit if fee activity contracts materially while TVL remains exposed to the memecoin side.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 91.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 65.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $174.94K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.21K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-LIT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#234 of 20205 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2199 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LIT liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LIT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price changes between SOL and LIT can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported APR decomposes into 65.0% from trading fees and 26.4% from rewards. 71% of the yield comes from trading fees, so the current return is tied to swap activity rather than an emission schedule. Reward dependency is not established in the supplied data; with reward APR at its current level, emission decay is not the present source of APR, but any future incentive change would alter the yield mix.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range coverage is also not available, so the recent loss profile and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LIT carries sharp price-movement and liquidity-exit risk; emission decay is a relevant family-level concern if incentives are introduced, and exit timing matters because fee income can fall quickly when speculative volume leaves.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the network's primary asset and has substantially broader liquidity across Solana than LIT, which can support more orderly external hedging or rebalancing. For this LP, a SOL move relative to LIT changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when the pool continues to generate fees.
tollLIT Context
LIT is the less established, memecoin-side asset in this pair, with liquidity more concentrated than SOL's broader Solana market. A sharp LIT rally or decline relative to SOL can move the position toward one asset and increase price-divergence risk, while reduced LIT trading activity can weaken fee generation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LIT into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but large price changes between SOL and LIT can leave you with more of the weaker-performing asset and a lower result than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 5H7c1wUYrE3uaEGNfaXLoR4jnUcmyNCRrhfk6oaVxFWt
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LIT (EicWvteV…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
77%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 91.4%, split between 65.0% in fees and 26.4% in rewards, so current yield is fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If rewards are added or later reduced, the reward component would decline without directly changing fee income.
The current APR is 91.4%, split between 65.0% in fees and 26.4% in rewards, so current yield is fee-driven rather than emission-driven. If rewards are added or later reduced, the reward component would decline without directly changing fee income.
The supplied figures show 26.4% from rewards, so there is no current reward APR to subtract from the reported 91.4%. If future incentives expire, the remaining return would depend on 65.0% and the pool's trading volume, with no assumption that fee activity stays constant.
The supplied figures show 26.4% from rewards, so there is no current reward APR to subtract from the reported 91.4%. If future incentives expire, the remaining return would depend on 65.0% and the pool's trading volume, with no assumption that fee activity stays constant.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because LIT can move sharply and its liquidity may thin during exits. The pool's current fee yield is 65.0%, but fees do not remove the risk of price divergence, inventory concentration, or rapid loss of trading activity.
Risk is high relative to a pool pairing SOL with a more established asset because LIT can move sharply and its liquidity may thin during exits. The pool's current fee yield is 65.0%, but fees do not remove the risk of price divergence, inventory concentration, or rapid loss of trading activity.
Use a predefined trigger such as the SOL/LIT price leaving your tick range, a sustained fall in fee generation below 65.0%, or a material TVL drain from $661K. Exiting before liquidity and trading activity deteriorate further can reduce exposure, but it can also crystallize existing price divergence.
Use a predefined trigger such as the SOL/LIT price leaving your tick range, a sustained fall in fee generation below 65.0%, or a material TVL drain from $661K. Exiting before liquidity and trading activity deteriorate further can reduce exposure, but it can also crystallize existing price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range record are unavailable. 65.0% is an annualized fee figure, not a guarantee; actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, range management, and whether fees offset the position's loss relative to holding.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range record are unavailable. 65.0% is an annualized fee figure, not a guarantee; actual break-even depends on future volume, price divergence, range management, and whether fees offset the position's loss relative to holding.
