new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool near the exit side of its framework: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. That assessment is consistent with scanner=CRITICAL and a strong unopposed EXIT signal, even though ai_engine=hold; the rank of #1436 of 8541 raydium-amm pools also places it well outside the stronger part of the tracked set. The assessment could change if the scanner issue is resolved, liquidity becomes materially deeper, and sustained volume raises fee income without relying on emissions; a TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-08-31 18:28 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$646.57
Total value locked
$1.21
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Do not add capital while the scanner's CRITICAL, unopposed exit signal remains active; if entering despite it, use a predefined rebalance or exit trigger based on a material TVL drain or a sustained deterioration in 0.00x, rather than waiting for fee income to offset a large price move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.21 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.00 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 JLP-$PAWPOW pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15754 of 95936 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the JLP-$PAWPOW liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and $PAWPOW into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply keeping the two tokens separately if either token moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% of yield comes from fees, so the APR depends on continued swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and any future emissions should be treated as temporary and subject to decay rather than as a durable return source.
shieldRisk Assessment
The pool's recent impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the realized IL burden and time spent within an effective range cannot be assessed from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, sharp price moves, thin liquidity, and rapid changes in trader interest can overwhelm fee income; emission decay and poorly timed exits are additional risks if incentives are introduced. The low activity relative to liquidity provides limited evidence that fees would compensate for those risks.
tollJLP Context
JLP is one side of this pool, so providing liquidity means holding exposure to JLP alongside $PAWPOW rather than holding JLP alone. The available pool data does not establish JLP's liquidity depth elsewhere; a sharp JLP move can change the pool's asset mix and create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets.
toll$PAWPOW Context
$PAWPOW is the other side of the pair and supplies the pool's memecoin-specific price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; abrupt $PAWPOW price movement can leave the LP with more of the falling asset while fees remain tied to actual swap volume.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing JLP and $PAWPOW into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your holdings can become less valuable than simply keeping the two tokens separately if either token moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 65miGG7W69JNpU1cembgjianopdb9Y3RJtSfZJJtoiWm
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- JLP (27G8MtK7…)
- Token B
- $PAWPOW (GJkVRoRH…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
14%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the stated 0.2% APR is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time, leaving fee income of 0.2% as the observable base.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so the stated 0.2% APR is not presently supported by emissions. If incentives are added, emission decay would reduce the reward portion over time, leaving fee income of 0.2% as the observable base.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward stream from the quoted yield. The remaining return would depend on 0.2% in trading fees, which is exposed to the pool's low 0.00x activity.
There is no current reward contribution in the stated APR, so expiration would not remove an existing reward stream from the quoted yield. The remaining return would depend on 0.2% in trading fees, which is exposed to the pool's low 0.00x activity.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with thin liquidity relative to the risks of abrupt price moves, and the live verdict is EXIT. Fee income of 0.2% may not compensate for impermanent loss or an exit during a liquidity contraction.
Risk is elevated because this is a MEMECOIN pool with thin liquidity relative to the risks of abrupt price moves, and the live verdict is EXIT. Fee income of 0.2% may not compensate for impermanent loss or an exit during a liquidity contraction.
For this pool, the existing CRITICAL and unopposed scanner signal is a predefined exit condition rather than a reason to wait for more yield. An LP should also reassess when TVL drains, 0.00x deteriorates, or the fee-based 0.2% return no longer justifies the token and liquidity risk.
For this pool, the existing CRITICAL and unopposed scanner signal is a predefined exit condition rather than a reason to wait for more yield. An LP should also reassess when TVL drains, 0.00x deteriorates, or the fee-based 0.2% return no longer justifies the token and liquidity risk.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee stream depends on low observed activity. With fee income of 0.2% and total stated APR of 0.2%, break-even requires sustained trading and stable enough relative prices for fees to outweigh the LP's divergence loss.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and the fee stream depends on low observed activity. With fee income of 0.2% and total stated APR of 0.2%, break-even requires sustained trading and stable enough relative prices for fees to outweigh the LP's divergence loss.
