new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 57/100 places this pool in a middling assessment: Enter is 51/100, Hold is 64/100, and Exit is 16/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with retaining exposure conditionally rather than treating the pool as an unqualified entry; its rank of #381 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools indicates it screens above many listed pools but is not among the highest-ranked group. The assessment would worsen with a material TVL drain, collapsing volume or fee APR, worsening execution conditions, or evidence of sustained out-of-range exposure; stronger and persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 19:34 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$238.95K
Total value locked
$93.54K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 160.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range you can monitor, and rebalance when HOTBOT/SOL approaches either boundary rather than waiting for the position to sit fully out of range. Use a falling volume-to-TVL ratio, a sustained TVL drain, or fee generation materially below 260.0% as an exit trigger.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 260.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $93.54K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.71K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 HOTBOT-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#543 of 4400 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3250 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the HOTBOT-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing HOTBOT and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become uneven when HOTBOT and SOL move differently, and you may lose money relative to simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR decomposes into 260.0% from trading fees and 240.0% from rewards. 52% of the yield comes from trading fees, so the quoted return is not currently dependent on an active reward stream; reward dependency itself is not established. Fee APR will vary with volume, liquidity, and the portion of trading captured by the position.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history is unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, HOTBOT-SOL is exposed to sharp HOTBOT/SOL price moves that can push a position out of range and leave it holding more of the weaker asset. Emission decay is an additional family-specific consideration even though the current displayed reward component is 240.0%; exit timing matters if trading activity or fee generation weakens.
tollHOTBOT Context
HOTBOT is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price changes directly determine the inventory mix and the extent of divergence loss for an LP. Liquidity depth for HOTBOT outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp HOTBOT move can therefore increase rebalancing needs and make exits more price-sensitive.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the quote-side asset and the more established reference asset in this pair. HOTBOT weakness generally leaves the LP with greater HOTBOT exposure, while HOTBOT strength can leave the LP with less HOTBOT than a simple hold; SOL's broader liquidity does not remove the pair's range and divergence risks.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing HOTBOT and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become uneven when HOTBOT and SOL move differently, and you may lose money relative to simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6D4EWF22HfQamimKhX47tqiu9DVCkcxDMrmhnSvewKAo
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- HOTBOT (8nnaeWCw…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 10/2/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward component of APR, but the current displayed reward component is 240.0% and 52% of yield comes from trading fees. Future APR therefore depends mainly on whether HOTBOT-SOL continues generating trading volume and fees.
Emission decay would reduce the reward component of APR, but the current displayed reward component is 240.0% and 52% of yield comes from trading fees. Future APR therefore depends mainly on whether HOTBOT-SOL continues generating trading volume and fees.
Because the current displayed reward component is 240.0%, expiration of farm incentives would not directly remove the fee component represented by 260.0%. It could still reduce future total APR if any rewards become active or if incentive changes affect pool volume and liquidity.
Because the current displayed reward component is 240.0%, expiration of farm incentives would not directly remove the fee component represented by 260.0%. It could still reduce future total APR if any rewards become active or if incentive changes affect pool volume and liquidity.
The main risks are HOTBOT price volatility, divergence from SOL, and moving outside the selected tick range. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the realized magnitude of those risks cannot be estimated from this dataset.
The main risks are HOTBOT price volatility, divergence from SOL, and moving outside the selected tick range. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and in-range history is unavailable, so the realized magnitude of those risks cannot be estimated from this dataset.
For HOTBOT-SOL, consider exiting when HOTBOT/SOL leaves the usable range and cannot be rebalanced at acceptable cost, or when TVL and trading volume fall enough that fee generation no longer justifies the exposure. A sustained decline from the current fee-based return represented by 260.0% is a concrete warning.
For HOTBOT-SOL, consider exiting when HOTBOT/SOL leaves the usable range and cannot be rebalanced at acceptable cost, or when TVL and trading volume fall enough that fee generation no longer justifies the exposure. A sustained decline from the current fee-based return represented by 260.0% is a concrete warning.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and range placement. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at approximately the realized rate behind 260.0% exceed divergence losses and transaction or rebalancing costs over the holding period.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume and range placement. The relevant comparison is whether cumulative fees at approximately the realized rate behind 260.0% exceed divergence losses and transaction or rebalancing costs over the holding period.
