new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 8/100 with Enter 10/100, Hold 5/100, and Exit 96/100 supports a hold rather than a clear new-entry signal: the hold score is the strongest of the three, while the overall score remains middling. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #279 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. That ranking makes PILL-SOL a relatively stronger pool within the tracked set, not a low-risk position. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, collapse in fee APR, or evidence of severe price divergence would change the assessment; a higher score would require durable fee generation and healthier liquidity conditions.
Computed 2026-11-11 09:48 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$3.86K
Total value locked
$1.27K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up230.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 59.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range with enough width for memecoin volatility, then rebalance when price reaches either outer 10% of that range; exit or reassess if 24-hour volume falls below current TVL, rather than treating 230.0% as fixed.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 230.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 119.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.27K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $12.16 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 pill-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#840 of 4637 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4187 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the pill-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PILL and SOL into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and the value can fall, especially because PILL is a memecoin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 119.6% from trading fees and 110.4% from rewards. 52% of yield comes from trading fees, so the quoted APR depends on continued volume, fee settings, and the LP's actual time in range. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-duration estimate is available; any future emission schedule could change the mix without changing fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable, so recent price-path damage and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, PILL-SOL carries sharp token-specific drawdown, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; a falling PILL price can leave the LP with more PILL exposure, while a rapid rise can shift inventory toward SOL. Any future emissions would also be subject to decay, making late entry and delayed exit potentially less favorable even if the initial APR appears high.
tollpill Context
PILL is the memecoin side of this pair, and its role here is to provide the volatile inventory against SOL for fee-generating swaps. Liquidity depth for PILL elsewhere is not established by the supplied data; thin external markets or abrupt PILL price moves can increase slippage and alter the LP's inventory quickly. Relative PILL strength generally shifts the position toward SOL, while PILL weakness tends to increase PILL exposure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base-asset side of the pair and provides the reference market against which PILL is priced. The supplied metrics do not establish SOL liquidity depth outside this pool, but SOL price movement affects the selected range and the composition of fees and inventory. A broad SOL move can also make a previously suitable range obsolete even if PILL-specific activity remains high.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PILL and SOL into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you holding more of the weaker asset and the value can fall, especially because PILL is a memecoin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6ELicDvGWaSYhUBFDQGckuRWZGP5du8bLuzWw3G7AQxD
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- pill (DvdmEnzt…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/18/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown shows 110.4% from rewards and 119.6% from fees, so the displayed 230.0% is currently fee-driven. If emissions are added or later decay, the reward component can fall without reducing trading fees, but the total APR would fall if volume and fees do not replace it.
The current breakdown shows 110.4% from rewards and 119.6% from fees, so the displayed 230.0% is currently fee-driven. If emissions are added or later decay, the reward component can fall without reducing trading fees, but the total APR would fall if volume and fees do not replace it.
The current metrics show 110.4% in reward APR, so there is no displayed reward yield to subtract at present. If incentives are introduced and then expire, only the reward portion would disappear; the remaining return would depend on 119.6%, $1K, and the LP's time in range.
The current metrics show 110.4% in reward APR, so there is no displayed reward yield to subtract at present. If incentives are introduced and then expire, only the reward portion would disappear; the remaining return would depend on 119.6%, $1K, and the LP's time in range.
Risk is high enough that the pool should be treated as a volatile MEMECOIN position, not as a stable fee instrument. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, while PILL price shocks, thin external liquidity, and delayed exits can materially change both inventory and value.
Risk is high enough that the pool should be treated as a volatile MEMECOIN position, not as a stable fee instrument. Seven-day impermanent-loss and range-utilization readings are unavailable, while PILL price shocks, thin external liquidity, and delayed exits can materially change both inventory and value.
Exit or reassess when PILL liquidity deteriorates, the price approaches the edge of your range, or fee-generating activity no longer supports the position. For this pool, a practical trigger is 24-hour volume falling below current TVL, combined with a weakening fee rate or a deteriorating risk assessment.
Exit or reassess when PILL liquidity deteriorates, the price approaches the edge of your range, or fee-generating activity no longer supports the position. For this pool, a practical trigger is 24-hour volume falling below current TVL, combined with a weakening fee rate or a deteriorating risk assessment.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss and range exposure are not available, and 119.6% is an annualized rate rather than a guarantee. Break-even requires comparing realized fees at your actual range utilization with the eventual value loss from PILL-SOL price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent loss and range exposure are not available, and 119.6% is an annualized rate rather than a guarantee. Break-even requires comparing realized fees at your actual range utilization with the eventual value loss from PILL-SOL price divergence.
