SOL-GRASSon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $65.68K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $306.72K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 6ScK5vYV…Nfkg · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 60/100, with Enter 56/100, Hold 65/100, and Exit 17/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Ranked #647 of 1049 orca-whirlpool pools, this is a middle-to-lower-ranked pool rather than a clear top-tier allocation, with its fee-funded APR offset by small TVL, concentrated-range uncertainty, and memecoin exposure. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee volume weakened enough to collapse 500.0%, persistent range data showed poor utilization, or a durable increase in fee activity and liquidity improved the pool's operating profile.
Computed 2026-08-23 02:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$65.68K
Total value locked
$306.72K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 244.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored, relatively narrow tick range and rebalance only while fee flow remains meaningful; set an exit rule for a sustained TVL decline from $66K or a material collapse in 500.0%, rather than waiting for the position to become entirely one-sided.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $306.72K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $918.74 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 12 SOL-GRASS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#22 of 13395 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #581 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GRASS liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GRASS into a pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token than the other, and the value of both tokens or the pool's trading activity can fall.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so the headline APR depends on continued swap activity rather than a current reward stream. Reward dependency and lifecycle data are not established; any future emissions would add a separate, decay-sensitive component that should not be treated as permanent yield.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range history are not available, so there is no observed window for estimating how often the position remained active or how much divergence it absorbed. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GRASS carries substantial price-divergence, liquidity, and exit-timing risk between SOL and GRASS; concentrated liquidity can also stop earning fees when price leaves the selected range. Unknown lifecycle and persistence data make emission decay and the durability of current fee activity harder to assess.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the deeper and more widely traded asset in this pair, with liquidity across many Solana venues beyond this pool. For this LP, a sharp SOL move against GRASS can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while SOL-side demand can also be a major source of swap fees.
tollGRASS Context
GRASS is the thinner and more volatile side of the pair relative to SOL, so its price action can dominate divergence risk for this position. Liquidity elsewhere may be less consistent than SOL liquidity; a rapid GRASS repricing can move the position out of range or leave the LP holding more GRASS after fees no longer offset the exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GRASS into a pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of one token than the other, and the value of both tokens or the pool's trading activity can fall.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6ScK5vYV7tbe8rR6Sc8gJwDzKkotNjRFzCe6YCw8Nfkg
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GRASS (Grass7B4…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee APR is 500.0% and 100% of stated yield is fee-based. Because reward dependency and lifecycle are unknown, future emissions could decay without changing current fee income, but any headline APR relying on them would decline.
The current reward component is 0.0%, while fee APR is 500.0% and 100% of stated yield is fee-based. Because reward dependency and lifecycle are unknown, future emissions could decay without changing current fee income, but any headline APR relying on them would decline.
The pool currently shows 0.0% reward APR, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated yield. The remaining return would depend on 500.0% trading-fee APR, which varies with $307K volume and $66K liquidity.
The pool currently shows 0.0% reward APR, so expiration would not remove a current reward stream from the stated yield. The remaining return would depend on 500.0% trading-fee APR, which varies with $307K volume and $66K liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a deep, established pair because SOL and GRASS can diverge sharply, liquidity is $66K, and concentrated liquidity may stop earning when price leaves range. The pool's MEMECOIN classification and unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss history make position sizing and exit timing especially important.
Risk is high relative to a deep, established pair because SOL and GRASS can diverge sharply, liquidity is $66K, and concentrated liquidity may stop earning when price leaves range. The pool's MEMECOIN classification and unavailable recent range and impermanent-loss history make position sizing and exit timing especially important.
For SOL-GRASS, use predefined signals such as a sustained decline from $66K, a sharp reduction in 4.67x activity, or a collapse in 500.0%. Exit or reduce exposure if the position becomes one-sided, the pool's liquidity becomes difficult to exit, or your assumed SOL-GRASS price relationship no longer holds.
For SOL-GRASS, use predefined signals such as a sustained decline from $66K, a sharp reduction in 4.67x activity, or a collapse in 500.0%. Exit or reduce exposure if the position becomes one-sided, the pool's liquidity becomes difficult to exit, or your assumed SOL-GRASS price relationship no longer holds.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 500.0% is generated by variable trading volume. At the current stated 500.0%, fees may offset divergence over time, but that outcome is not guaranteed and depends on continued activity near your tick range.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and 500.0% is generated by variable trading volume. At the current stated 500.0%, fees may offset divergence over time, but that outcome is not guaranteed and depends on continued activity near your tick range.
