WealthVille
QUEST
Q
SOL
S

QUEST-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $97.16K
APR
94.0% APR
24h Volume
$9.31K 24h vol
Pool address
6e11zRwK…CZLx · observed 2026-10-05
53D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 54% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter48

new capital

Hold59

keep position

Exit22

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 53/100, with Enter at 48/100, Hold at 59/100, Exit at 22/100, and a live verdict of HOLD driven by ai_engine=hold. Ranked #296 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, this places QUEST-SOL in a monitored hold category rather than a clear new-entry signal: the fee-funded structure is a positive, but the modest 0.10x turnover and memecoin exposure limit conviction. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or fee APR collapses, and would strengthen only if fee generation persists alongside stable or growing liquidity and usable range activity.

Computed 2026-10-05 22:44 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$97.16K

Total value locked

$9.31K

24h volume

×0.1 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

94.0%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -33.4%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 58m agoTVL ↓5.6%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 71% of APR from trading fees
tips_and_updates

Use a range with alerts at 80% of each boundary, check the position at least daily, and rebalance or exit when QUEST-SOL reaches either alert unless observed fee accrual is still compensating for the increasing out-of-range risk.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR94.0%——
Fee APR66.3%——
Volume$9.31K——
Fees Earned$177.34——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
66.6%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−100.0%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-33.4%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.10x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0018
Fee APR Sustainability
71% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 2 QUEST-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#413 of 4043 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #2587 of 132693

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the QUEST-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing QUEST and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of QUEST and SOL you own can change as their prices move, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

Yield is decomposed into 66.3% fee APR and 27.7% reward APR, with fee sustainability at 71%. The current return therefore depends on QUEST-SOL trading fees, not a reported reward allocation. Reward dependency and the remaining reward duration are not established, so the fee APR should not be treated as a guaranteed forward return.

shieldRisk Assessment

A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range reading are not available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, QUEST-SOL also carries heightened token-price and liquidity risk: emission decay can remove any future incentive support, while exit timing matters if QUEST liquidity or market attention contracts. Fee income may fall before an LP can exit without material price impact.

tollQUEST Context

QUEST is the memecoin-side asset in this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines much of the LP's inventory change and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for QUEST outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thin external liquidity would make QUEST price moves and exits more disruptive for LPs.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset paired with QUEST and provides the reference price for the pool's exchange rate. SOL's broader market liquidity can support execution, but a QUEST-SOL LP still bears the relative-move risk: a sharp SOL move against QUEST changes the position's asset mix and can reduce fee-adjusted returns.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing QUEST and SOL into the pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of QUEST and SOL you own can change as their prices move, and the memecoin may be difficult to sell quickly.

token

Token Details

QU
QUESTSolana
Explorer

QUEST is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
6e11zRwK3BPQx4zgcdx7CUbrNjH8Xf2sLNQGchp7CZLx
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
QUEST (QUESTP8x…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
8/21/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The pool currently reports 66.3% from fees and 27.7% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 71%. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall; the currently reported return is therefore primarily dependent on trading fees.

The pool currently reports 66.3% from fees and 27.7% from rewards, with fee sustainability at 71%. If emissions are added and later decay, the reward portion would fall; the currently reported return is therefore primarily dependent on trading fees.

There is currently no reported reward component beyond 27.7%, so expiration would not remove a reported source of yield at present. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity, with TVL at $97K and turnover at 0.10x.

There is currently no reported reward component beyond 27.7%, so expiration would not remove a reported source of yield at present. Fee income would remain dependent on trading activity, with TVL at $97K and turnover at 0.10x.

Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because QUEST can experience sharp price changes and thinner liquidity. The pool has $97K in liquidity and 94.0% total APR, but recent impermanent-loss and range readings are unavailable, so the fee return cannot be reliably compared with that price risk.

Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because QUEST can experience sharp price changes and thinner liquidity. The pool has $97K in liquidity and 94.0% total APR, but recent impermanent-loss and range readings are unavailable, so the fee return cannot be reliably compared with that price risk.

Consider exiting when QUEST-SOL approaches or leaves the selected range, when QUEST liquidity becomes difficult to trade, or when fee accrual no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. A sustained TVL drain, falling volume, or collapse in 66.3% would be concrete reassessment signals.

Consider exiting when QUEST-SOL approaches or leaves the selected range, when QUEST liquidity becomes difficult to trade, or when fee accrual no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. A sustained TVL drain, falling volume, or collapse in 66.3% would be concrete reassessment signals.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and fee generation varies with trading volume. 66.3% is an annualized reference, not a guarantee that fees will offset the pool's price divergence on any fixed schedule.

No defensible break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent loss is unavailable and fee generation varies with trading volume. 66.3% is an annualized reference, not a guarantee that fees will offset the pool's price divergence on any fixed schedule.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights