WealthVille
ANSEM
A
SOL
S

ANSEM-SOLon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $2.23M
APR
396.5% APR
24h Volume
$5.19M 24h vol
Pool address
6e7V9eegrvpN · observed 2026-08-23
63C · Fair

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 61% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter62

new capital

Hold65

keep position

Exit17

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 63/100, with Enter at 62/100, Hold at 65/100, Exit at 17/100, and a live verdict of HOLD. The verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, which is consistent with a pool that has substantial fee activity and a high rank of #20 of 1696 but still carries memecoin and liquidity-decay exposure. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to reduce 160.6%, fee sustainability weakened, or price and range conditions produced materially adverse LP results.

Computed 2026-08-23 14:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$2.23M

Total value locked

$5.19M

24h volume

×2.3 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

396.5%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

156.9%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 7m agoTVL 1.5%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleHigh swap activity: vol/TVL ratio 2.33x
tips_and_updates

Enter with a range centered on the current active ANSEM-SOL ticks, and withdraw or recenter when the position moves out of range or when rolling volume no longer supports the observed 2.33x turnover.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR396.5%
Fee APR160.6%
Volume$5.19M
Fees Earned$10.08K

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
165.3%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−8.4%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
156.9%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
2.33x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0045
Fee APR Sustainability
41% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 11 ANSEM-SOL pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#61 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 1% of all Solana pools

overall rank #559 of 95923

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ANSEM-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token, and a memecoin selloff or falling trading activity can reduce the position's value and income.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The stated yield decomposes into 160.6% from trading fees and 235.9% from rewards, with 41%. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component is the clearer basis for evaluating sustainability; the pool is in the MEMECOIN family, where trading activity and liquidity can decay quickly and exit timing matters. No reward-duration estimate is established for this pool.

shieldRisk Assessment

The available record does not provide a 7-day impermanent-loss reading or a 7-day tick-in-range reading, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified here. As a MEMECOIN pool, ANSEM-SOL carries elevated token-price, liquidity-withdrawal, and emission-decay risk; a reduction in trading activity can lower fee income, while delayed exit can leave liquidity exposed after market interest fades.

tollANSEM Context

ANSEM is the memecoin side of this pair, so an ANSEM price move against SOL changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss relative to holding both assets. This sheet does not establish ANSEM's liquidity depth elsewhere, making exchangeability and exit conditions outside this pool an open due-diligence item.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the more established asset in the pair and serves as the comparison asset for ANSEM's price movement. SOL's broader market depth is not quantified in this sheet; if ANSEM weakens against SOL, the LP can accumulate ANSEM while fee income may not compensate for the relative price loss.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing token, and a memecoin selloff or falling trading activity can reduce the position's value and income.

token

Token Details

AN
ANSEMSolana
Explorer

ANSEM is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
6e7V9eegCHw997T72MxgwwJipZ6GJyZF8NvjkzT1rvpN
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
Token B
SOL (So111111…)
Created
7/1/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay matters because any reward component can fall as incentives reduce, but the current accounting assigns 235.9% to rewards and 160.6% to fees. With 41% of yield from trading fees, the main variable is whether ANSEM-SOL trading volume persists.

Emission decay matters because any reward component can fall as incentives reduce, but the current accounting assigns 235.9% to rewards and 160.6% to fees. With 41% of yield from trading fees, the main variable is whether ANSEM-SOL trading volume persists.

If incentives expire, the reward component would fall from 235.9% toward zero, leaving the fee component of 160.6%. The resulting APR would depend on future trading volume and liquidity rather than emissions.

If incentives expire, the reward component would fall from 235.9% toward zero, leaving the fee component of 160.6%. The resulting APR would depend on future trading volume and liquidity rather than emissions.

The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because ANSEM can lose value quickly, liquidity can retreat, and LP inventory can shift toward ANSEM during a decline. The pool currently shows $2.2M liquidity and 2.33x volume-to-liquidity turnover, but recent impermanent-loss and range data are not established.

The risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because ANSEM can lose value quickly, liquidity can retreat, and LP inventory can shift toward ANSEM during a decline. The pool currently shows $2.2M liquidity and 2.33x volume-to-liquidity turnover, but recent impermanent-loss and range data are not established.

Consider exiting when ANSEM liquidity or trading volume falls materially, when the position remains out of range, or when the fee income represented by 160.6% no longer compensates for memecoin price and inventory risk. A sharp TVL drain would be a stronger exit signal than APR alone.

Consider exiting when ANSEM liquidity or trading volume falls materially, when the position remains out of range, or when the fee income represented by 160.6% no longer compensates for memecoin price and inventory risk. A sharp TVL drain would be a stronger exit signal than APR alone.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss history and realized fee data. The stated 160.6% is annualized and may not persist, so it should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period for price divergence.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated without a recent impermanent-loss history and realized fee data. The stated 160.6% is annualized and may not persist, so it should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period for price divergence.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights