syrupUSDC-USDCon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpool
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $10.06M
- APR
- 1.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.73M 24h vol
- Pool address
- 6fteKNvM…613J · observed 2026-10-08
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 61% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 produces Enter 40/100, Hold 69/100, and Exit 50/100, with the live verdict at REDUCE and the stated driver ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #60 of 3928 orca-whirlpool pools places it relatively high within that pool universe, but the score is not a guarantee of capital preservation: the fee-led return depends on continued volume, while MEMECOIN exposure and unavailable recent range and IL data limit certainty. A sustained TVL drain, materially lower trading activity, fee-yield collapse, or a sharp deterioration in SYRUPUSDC liquidity would warrant a lower assessment; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-10-07 23:57 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$10.06M
Total value locked
$2.73M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a wider-than-spot range at entry and set an operational trigger to reassess when SYRUPUSDC approaches either outer tick; if the position is out of range or fee generation no longer compensates for the inventory shift, withdraw or reset the range rather than waiting for an unreported IL recovery.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.73M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $273.28 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 syrupUSDC-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#193 of 16330 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1635 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the syrupUSDC-USDC liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SYRUPUSDC and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, earning part of the swap fees. The value and mix of what you own can change when SYRUPUSDC moves sharply, and the pool currently has no reward-based return to offset that risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 1.0% from swap fees and 0.0% from rewards. 100% means the displayed return depends on trading activity rather than incentive emissions; reward dependency and any emission schedule are not established in the available data. If rewards are introduced or later decay, the reward component should be treated as temporary unless replenishment is documented.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that stayed in range are not available in the current data, so recent IL and range efficiency cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, SYRUPUSDC-USDC carries asymmetric price and liquidity risk: a fast SYRUPUSDC move can push a concentrated position out of range, reduce fee capture, and leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset. Emission decay is an additional risk if incentives are added later, and exit timing matters because liquidity and trading activity can deteriorate quickly after attention fades.
tollsyrupUSDC Context
SYRUPUSDC is the volatile, memecoin-side asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quoted dollar unit. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a price rise or fall in SYRUPUSDC changes the inventory mix of the LP and can create impermanent loss relative to simply holding both assets.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable settlement asset and the reference side against which SYRUPUSDC is priced. Its broader liquidity depth is not established by the supplied metrics, but USDC exposure generally reduces directional volatility versus holding only SYRUPUSDC; a decline in SYRUPUSDC typically leaves the LP with more USDC and less upside exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SYRUPUSDC and USDC into a trading pool so other users can swap between them, earning part of the swap fees. The value and mix of what you own can change when SYRUPUSDC moves sharply, and the pool currently has no reward-based return to offset that risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6fteKNvMdv7tYmBoJHhj1jx6rHcEwC6RdSEmVpyS613J
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- syrupUSDC (AvZZF1Ya…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
80%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is 1.0%, consisting of 1.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no current reward contribution to decay. If emissions are introduced later, their decline would reduce APR unless trading fees rise enough to replace them.
The current return is 1.0%, consisting of 1.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so there is no current reward contribution to decay. If emissions are introduced later, their decline would reduce APR unless trading fees rise enough to replace them.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not reduce the presently reported fee-led return directly; the remaining source would be 1.0% in trading fees. Actual LP income would still fall if the incentives had been attracting volume or liquidity that later leaves.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, expiration would not reduce the presently reported fee-led return directly; the remaining source would be 1.0% in trading fees. Actual LP income would still fall if the incentives had been attracting volume or liquidity that later leaves.
The main risks are a sharp SYRUPUSDC price move, concentrated liquidity leaving its active range, and declining liquidity after memecoin attention fades. Recent IL and range-occupancy readings are not available, while the fee-led return is 1.0% and depends on continued trading.
The main risks are a sharp SYRUPUSDC price move, concentrated liquidity leaving its active range, and declining liquidity after memecoin attention fades. Recent IL and range-occupancy readings are not available, while the fee-led return is 1.0% and depends on continued trading.
Review or exit when SYRUPUSDC approaches an outer tick, the position moves out of range, pool liquidity drains, or fee generation no longer compensates for the changing token mix. For this pool, compare ongoing fee income with the current 1.0% fee component rather than relying on the 1.0% headline alone.
Review or exit when SYRUPUSDC approaches an outer tick, the position moves out of range, pool liquidity drains, or fee generation no longer compensates for the changing token mix. For this pool, compare ongoing fee income with the current 1.0% fee component rather than relying on the 1.0% headline alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and in-range data are unavailable. Fees accrue at the displayed 1.0% rate only if volume persists, so recovery depends on future trading activity and SYRUPUSDC price behavior rather than a fixed timetable.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss and in-range data are unavailable. Fees accrue at the displayed 1.0% rate only if volume persists, so recovery depends on future trading activity and SYRUPUSDC price behavior rather than a fixed timetable.
