WealthVille
ORE
O
GLDx
G

ORE-GLDxon Meteora DLMMHigh Yield

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $200.93K
APR
111.8% APR
24h Volume
$148.26K 24h vol
Pool address
6iMKsFAk…5q2p · observed 2026-11-11
48D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 57% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter43

new capital

Hold53

keep position

Exit28

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 48/100, with Enter at 43/100, Hold at 53/100, and Exit at 28/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, placing the pool at rank #692 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. This supports monitoring an existing position rather than treating the score as a strong entry signal: the fee-only structure is transparent, but activity and range-performance history are limited in the supplied data. A TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sustained reduction in volume-to-liquidity, or a change to an Exit verdict would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and improved range data would strengthen it.

Computed 2026-11-11 13:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$200.93K

Total value locked

$148.26K

24h volume

×0.7 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

111.8%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 73.5%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 41m agoTVL ↓1.3%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

warningElevated risk score: 81/100
tips_and_updates

Use a monitored range and rebalance when price reaches either boundary; exit if the live verdict changes from HOLD or if the pool's fee volume falls materially while TVL remains unchanged.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR111.8%——
Fee APR75.1%——
Volume$148.26K——
Fees Earned$419.62——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
76.2%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−2.8%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
73.5%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.74x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0021
Fee APR Sustainability
67% from trading fees(reward-dependent)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 ORE-GLDx pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#348 of 4637 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 2% of all Solana pools

overall rank #1864 of 157883

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ORE-GLDx liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing ORE and GLDX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding them.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The reported yield decomposes into 75.1% fee APR and 36.7% reward APR. 67% of yield comes from trading fees, so the headline APR depends on swap activity rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no reported reward contribution to model as an additional source of return.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied record. As a MEMECOIN pool, ORE-GLDX is exposed to sharp token-specific price moves and possible liquidity migration. Emission decay is not currently the main APR risk because rewards contribute nothing to the reported yield; exit timing instead depends on fee volume, token volatility, and whether liquidity remains in the selected range.

tollORE Context

ORE is one side of the ORE-GLDX LP, so an ORE price move relative to GLDX changes the inventory mix and can create impermanent loss even when fees accrue. The supplied pool data does not establish ORE's liquidity depth across other venues; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make rebalancing or exiting more costly.

tollGLDx Context

GLDX is the other side of the pair, and its price action relative to ORE determines whether the position remains balanced or becomes concentrated in one token. Cross-venue GLDX liquidity depth is not provided, so an LP should verify market depth before assuming that fee income can offset a large GLDX move.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing ORE and GLDX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price changes between the two tokens can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding them.

token

Token Details

ORE
ORESolana
Explorer

ORE is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

GLDx
GLDxGold xStockSolana
Explorer

Gold xStock (GLDx) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
6iMKsFAkkvXS6E1Q4hyHARQkLn3HFLrwTo1JStLw5q2p
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
ORE (oreoU2P8…)
Token B
GLDx (Xsv9hRk1…)
Created
9/18/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

Emission decay has no reported effect on the current breakdown because reward APR is 36.7% and fee APR is 75.1%. The reported 111.8% therefore depends on trading fees, although lower activity could reduce future fee income.

Emission decay has no reported effect on the current breakdown because reward APR is 36.7% and fee APR is 75.1%. The reported 111.8% therefore depends on trading fees, although lower activity could reduce future fee income.

The current pool already reports 36.7% reward APR and 67% fee sustainability. If incentives expire or remain absent, the remaining return is trading-fee income, which depends on swap volume rather than emissions.

The current pool already reports 36.7% reward APR and 67% fee sustainability. If incentives expire or remain absent, the remaining return is trading-fee income, which depends on swap volume rather than emissions.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain range performance, and the possibility of sharp ORE or GLDX price moves. TVL is $201K and the volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.74x, so fee income may not reliably offset adverse price divergence.

Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain range performance, and the possibility of sharp ORE or GLDX price moves. TVL is $201K and the volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.74x, so fee income may not reliably offset adverse price divergence.

Use a predefined exit rule, such as leaving when price reaches a range boundary, fee activity deteriorates materially, or the live verdict changes from HOLD. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in 75.1% is also a concrete reason to reassess.

Use a predefined exit rule, such as leaving when price reaches a range boundary, fee activity deteriorates materially, or the live verdict changes from HOLD. A sustained TVL drain or collapse in 75.1% is also a concrete reason to reassess.

It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization history are unavailable. In principle, break-even requires accumulated fee income at 75.1% to exceed the position's price-divergence loss; the 111.8% headline should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.

It cannot be estimated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization history are unavailable. In principle, break-even requires accumulated fee income at 75.1% to exceed the position's price-divergence loss; the 111.8% headline should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights