new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 47/100 assigns Enter 40/100, Hold 55/100, and Exit 25/100, producing the live verdict HOLD under the ai_engine=hold driver. Its #444 of 2403 ranking among raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish strong standalone liquidity or persistence. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell further, or fee APR collapsed; it would improve if sustained trading increased fee generation without a corresponding liquidity deterioration.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$75.55K
Total value locked
$4.75K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up2.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -25.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL/PEP price, set an alert for a sustained deterioration in 0.06x, and exit or recenter if fee generation no longer compensates for PEP's price divergence or the pool's liquidity begins to drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 2.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.75K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $11.88 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-pep pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15469 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 29% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18932 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-pep liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PEP into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and withdrawing may be harder if the pool becomes thin.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's yield consists of 2.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, making the return dependent on continued swaps rather than emissions. Because the reward component is currently absent, there is no reward schedule to extend the stated APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and no seven-day tick-in-range reading is reported, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PEP carries substantial token-specific volatility and liquidity-exit risk; emission decay is not currently the main issue because rewards contribute nothing, while exit timing matters if PEP demand or pool liquidity weakens. The pool's lifecycle and persistence are not established by the available data.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, more broadly traded asset in this pair, with deeper liquidity across Solana markets than a single SOL-PEP pool can provide. SOL price moves change the pool's relative balance and can create impermanent loss when SOL and PEP do not move together; a sharp SOL move can also make a fixed range less efficient.
tollpep Context
PEP is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity, holder concentration, and price response should be assessed separately from this pool. A rapid PEP move against SOL can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset, while thin PEP liquidity can make exiting more costly than the displayed fee return suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PEP into a shared trading pool and receiving a portion of swap fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and withdrawing may be harder if the pool becomes thin.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 6txNZWajZtoSgZUyhkh2MVwJ4CnKstTQyi3uSwxr85ir
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- pep (Zc4uJVrH…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently reducing a reward component because 0.0% is the reward-only APR. The stated return instead depends on 2.2% in trading fees, with 99% coming from fees.
Emission decay is not currently reducing a reward component because 0.0% is the reward-only APR. The stated return instead depends on 2.2% in trading fees, with 99% coming from fees.
The pool already reports no reward contribution, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. Future returns would continue to depend primarily on 2.2% and the trading activity represented by 0.06x.
The pool already reports no reward contribution, so incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream. Future returns would continue to depend primarily on 2.2% and the trading activity represented by 0.06x.
Risk is high relative to a pair of established assets because PEP can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and difficult exits. The fee-only 2.2% return does not by itself offset impermanent loss or a decline in pool liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a pair of established assets because PEP can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and difficult exits. The fee-only 2.2% return does not by itself offset impermanent loss or a decline in pool liquidity.
For SOL-PEP, consider exiting when PEP liquidity or demand weakens, when 0.06x declines persistently, or when the position becomes heavily concentrated in PEP after a large relative price move. A fee-only pool gives no emissions-based reason to remain after trading activity deteriorates.
For SOL-PEP, consider exiting when PEP liquidity or demand weakens, when 0.06x declines persistently, or when the position becomes heavily concentrated in PEP after a large relative price move. A fee-only pool gives no emissions-based reason to remain after trading activity deteriorates.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not available and future volume is uncertain. At 2.2%, recovery would require sustained fee income and sufficiently limited SOL-PEP price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not available and future volume is uncertain. At 2.2%, recovery would require sustained fee income and sufficiently limited SOL-PEP price divergence.
