GLDx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $892.15K
- APR
- 18.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $2.26M 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.10% fee
- Pool address
- 78ReVNML…hyze · observed 2026-10-22
Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 56% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 59/100 places this pool near the listed Enter threshold, with Enter 55/100 / Hold 64/100 / Exit 18/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=enter, and the pool ranks #19 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools. The score should not be read as protection from memecoin risk: the assessment would change if TVL drains, fee volume contracts, fee-only APR collapses, GLDX volatility pushes liquidity out of range, or a reward program is introduced and then decays.
Computed 2026-10-22 01:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$892.15K
Total value locked
$2.26M
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up18.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 22.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range wide enough to tolerate the observed volatility and rebalance when price reaches roughly 80% of either range boundary; exit rather than repeatedly recenter if fee income falls below your required compensation for GLDX exposure or if pool liquidity begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 18.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 17.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.26M | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $2.26K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#5 of 13 GLDx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#728 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4323 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GLDx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large GLDX price move can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and may make the position worth less than holding them separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 18.8% decomposes into 17.3% from trading fees and 1.6% from rewards. 92% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current APR does not depend on an active reward stream. Reward duration is not established in the supplied pool data; if incentives are introduced or changed, emission decay could alter the mix without changing the underlying fee demand.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and seven-day tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency and fee-offset performance cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GLDX-USDC carries sharp repricing and liquidity-contraction risk; concentrated liquidity can become one-sided during a rapid GLDX move. Emission decay is a secondary family risk here because current reward yield is zero, but exit timing still matters if volume, fees, or available liquidity deteriorate.
tollGLDx Context
GLDX is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC supplies the stable accounting side of the position. Liquidity depth for GLDX outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, so a GLDX move can create both inventory imbalance and wider execution conditions elsewhere. For the LP, sustained GLDX appreciation or decline changes the position composition and can increase impermanent-loss exposure relative to simply holding the two tokens.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable asset paired against GLDX and usually has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a memecoin token, although this pool's metrics do not quantify its available depth elsewhere. USDC reduces the pair's directional exposure on one side but does not prevent losses caused by GLDX repricing, concentration-range exhaustion, or stablecoin-specific depeg risk.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and USDC into a trading range so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large GLDX price move can leave you holding a different mix of the two assets and may make the position worth less than holding them separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 78ReVNMLGRWmjtf2HmBoHUe2pRcsctXTTbxJnbhchyze
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GLDx (Xsv9hRk1…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 1.6%, so the displayed 18.8% is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time unless trading fees, represented by 17.3%, offset the decline.
Current reward-only APR is 1.6%, so the displayed 18.8% is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If rewards are added later, emission decay would reduce that reward component over time unless trading fees, represented by 17.3%, offset the decline.
The supplied data shows no current reward contribution, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the reported APR. The position would then depend on trading fees of 17.3% and the pool's ability to maintain volume against $892K of liquidity.
The supplied data shows no current reward contribution, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward stream from the reported APR. The position would then depend on trading fees of 17.3% and the pool's ability to maintain volume against $892K of liquidity.
Risk is high relative to a stable or closely correlated pair because GLDX can reprice rapidly and leave concentrated liquidity one-sided. The pool currently reports total APR of 18.8% and a 2.54x Vol/TVL ratio, but the lack of recent impermanent-loss and range-history data limits verification of how well fees have offset that risk.
Risk is high relative to a stable or closely correlated pair because GLDX can reprice rapidly and leave concentrated liquidity one-sided. The pool currently reports total APR of 18.8% and a 2.54x Vol/TVL ratio, but the lack of recent impermanent-loss and range-history data limits verification of how well fees have offset that risk.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for GLDX volatility, when TVL or trading volume contracts materially, or when price repeatedly reaches the boundaries of your range. For this pool, a sustained decline from 17.3% fee-only APR or a worsening liquidity trend would weaken the current HOLD assessment.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for GLDX volatility, when TVL or trading volume contracts materially, or when price repeatedly reaches the boundaries of your range. For this pool, a sustained decline from 17.3% fee-only APR or a worsening liquidity trend would weaken the current HOLD assessment.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee income depends on changing volume, price path, and range placement. The relevant offset is 17.3% in fee-only APR, not 1.6%, but that annualized figure is not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
A defensible break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee income depends on changing volume, price path, and range placement. The relevant offset is 17.3% in fee-only APR, not 1.6%, but that annualized figure is not a guaranteed recovery schedule.
