GLDx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $345.66K
- APR
- 12.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $101.31K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.10% fee
- Pool address
- 78ReVNML…hyze · observed 2026-09-05
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 53/100 places this pool in a middle assessment rather than a clear entry signal: Enter is 47/100, Hold is 60/100, and Exit is 20/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The AI engine's hold assessment is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has some trading activity but a 0.29x volume-to-TVL ratio and memecoin-specific price risk. Its rank of #830 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools indicates it sits above many listed pools but does not by itself establish superior risk-adjusted returns. A sustained TVL drain, further volume deterioration, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and stable liquidity would support reassessment.
Computed 2026-09-05 03:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$345.66K
Total value locked
$101.31K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up12.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only after setting a defined price range around the current GLDX-USDC price, and rebalance when spot leaves that range; exit if pool TVL drains materially or fee income no longer compensates for the additional GLDX inventory risk.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 12.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 11.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $101.31K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $101.32 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 11 GLDx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#665 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #4888 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GLDx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large GLDX price moves can leave you holding a different mix of GLDX and USDC than you deposited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The return consists of 11.4% in trading-fee APR and 0.7% in reward APR, with 94% of yield coming from fees. Reward dependency cannot be verified from the supplied pool data, so the fee component is the more relevant basis for assessing persistence. If trading volume declines, the fee-derived portion of the APR will decline with it.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and the share of liquidity that remained in range are not available in the supplied metrics, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be assessed from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, GLDX-USDC carries material price-dislocation risk: a sharp GLDX move can convert the position toward the weaker-performing asset while fee income may not offset the inventory change. Emission timing is also uncertain, so an LP should not assume that any future incentive stream will persist.
tollGLDx Context
GLDX is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC supplies the dollar-denominated quote side. The supplied data does not establish GLDX's liquidity depth elsewhere, so large GLDX price moves may have a greater effect on this position than on a deeper market. When GLDX rises or falls sharply, the pool's inventory composition changes and can increase impermanent-loss exposure.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable quote asset used to price GLDX in this pool. Its broader liquidity depth is not established by the supplied metrics, but its intended role is to anchor one side of the position to a dollar value. If GLDX weakens, the LP generally accumulates more GLDX and less USDC; if GLDX strengthens, the reverse occurs.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large GLDX price moves can leave you holding a different mix of GLDX and USDC than you deposited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 78ReVNMLGRWmjtf2HmBoHUe2pRcsctXTTbxJnbhchyze
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GLDx (Xsv9hRk1…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
93%
APR
1%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently attributes its return to 11.4% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, with 94% of yield from trading fees. Because reward dependency is not established, any future emission decay would primarily remove or reduce the reward component rather than the fee component.
The pool currently attributes its return to 11.4% in fees and 0.7% in rewards, with 94% of yield from trading fees. Because reward dependency is not established, any future emission decay would primarily remove or reduce the reward component rather than the fee component.
If incentives expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only level of 11.4%, assuming trading volume and liquidity remain similar. With 94% of current yield already coming from fees, the main effect would be a reduction in any reward contribution rather than the removal of all yield.
If incentives expire, the total APR should move toward the fee-only level of 11.4%, assuming trading volume and liquidity remain similar. With 94% of current yield already coming from fees, the main effect would be a reduction in any reward contribution rather than the removal of all yield.
The pool has TVL of $346K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.29x, while GLDX can experience large price moves typical of a memecoin. Fees are based on actual trading activity, so they may not offset the inventory and impermanent-loss risk created by a rapid GLDX repricing.
The pool has TVL of $346K and a volume-to-TVL ratio of 0.29x, while GLDX can experience large price moves typical of a memecoin. Fees are based on actual trading activity, so they may not offset the inventory and impermanent-loss risk created by a rapid GLDX repricing.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if TVL drains, volume falls enough to reduce fee APR, or GLDX's price behavior makes the position's inventory risk unacceptable. A change away from the current HOLD assessment or a materially weaker score would also warrant reassessing the position.
For this pool, an exit is more defensible if TVL drains, volume falls enough to reduce fee APR, or GLDX's price behavior makes the position's inventory risk unacceptable. A change away from the current HOLD assessment or a materially weaker score would also warrant reassessing the position.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent IL and in-range performance are not available, and future volume is uncertain. The relevant income rate is the fee-only APR of 11.4%; break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's realized impermanent loss and any rebalancing costs.
A precise break-even period cannot be established because recent IL and in-range performance are not available, and future volume is uncertain. The relevant income rate is the fee-only APR of 11.4%; break-even requires cumulative fees to exceed the position's realized impermanent loss and any rebalancing costs.
