GTR-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $154.34K
- APR
- 3.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $6.77K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.18% fee
- Pool address
- 7UcJZUGK…oVWM · observed 2026-11-03
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 assigns Enter 10/100, Hold 30/100, and Exit 60/100, producing the live verdict AVOID. That result is consistent with the AI engine's hold signal being outweighed by a 80/100 risk score and weak yield, and the pool's #1795-of-9963 rank among raydium-clmm pools places it well below most listed alternatives. The assessment would improve only with sustained volume relative to TVL, deeper liquidity, lower measured risk, or materially stronger fee generation; a TVL drain, yield collapse, or worsening GTR liquidity would strengthen the avoid case.
Computed 2026-11-02 23:56 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$154.34K
Total value locked
$6.77K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 4.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow range only with active monitoring, rebalance when GTR leaves that range, and treat a move to an exit verdict or a sustained decline in fee generation as a reason to close the position rather than wait for emissions.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 2.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $6.77K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $12.19 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 GTR-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1409 of 19999 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18239 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GTR-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GTR and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but GTR's price changes can leave you with more of one asset and a loss relative to simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield is decomposed into 2.9% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 99% of yield from trading fees. Reward dependency and the reward schedule are not established, so the quoted return should be treated as dependent on future trading volume rather than as an emissions-supported rate.
shieldRisk Assessment
The supplied data does not report a seven-day impermanent-loss reading or a seven-day tick-in-range reading, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GTR-USDC carries token-specific price and liquidity risk, while concentrated-liquidity exposure can turn a sharp GTR move into out-of-range exposure and adverse inventory rebalancing. Emission decay and exit timing remain important even though current rewards do not contribute to the quoted APR.
tollGTR Context
GTR is the volatile asset in this pair, so its price movement determines much of the LP's inventory shift and impermanent-loss exposure. Liquidity depth for GTR elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; thin external liquidity would increase execution impact when rebalancing or exiting. A sharp GTR rally or decline can move the position away from its intended range and leave the LP holding a different GTR-USDC mix.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable-value side of the pair and provides the accounting reference for the pool's dollar-denominated TVL and fees. The available data does not quantify USDC liquidity elsewhere, but USDC price stability generally makes GTR's movements the dominant source of divergence risk. If USDC liquidity or its market peg deteriorates, the pair has an additional risk beyond GTR volatility.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GTR and USDC into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but GTR's price changes can leave you with more of one asset and a loss relative to simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7UcJZUGKfR7CbEgHJnfJwZvN6TX1gvuYZdXJXA82oVWM
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GTR (CatEvkKV…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 10/9/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is split between 2.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emissions do not currently account for the quoted return. If future rewards are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Current yield is split between 2.9% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, so emissions do not currently account for the quoted return. If future rewards are introduced and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The stated reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove the fee component of 2.9%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, with 99% already attributed to fees.
The stated reward component is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove the fee component of 2.9%. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, with 99% already attributed to fees.
The pool carries a 80/100 risk score and is classified as MEMECOIN, making GTR volatility, liquidity gaps, and concentrated-range exposure central risks. The available data does not establish recent seven-day impermanent loss or tick-in-range performance, so those risks cannot be bounded from the supplied history.
The pool carries a 80/100 risk score and is classified as MEMECOIN, making GTR volatility, liquidity gaps, and concentrated-range exposure central risks. The available data does not establish recent seven-day impermanent loss or tick-in-range performance, so those risks cannot be bounded from the supplied history.
For GTR-USDC, an exit is defensible when GTR leaves the active range, fee generation weakens materially, liquidity drains, or the live verdict moves further toward exit. Waiting through emission decay is not a substitute for monitoring because the current return is primarily fee-based.
For GTR-USDC, an exit is defensible when GTR leaves the active range, fee generation weakens materially, liquidity drains, or the live verdict moves further toward exit. Waiting through emission decay is not a substitute for monitoring because the current return is primarily fee-based.
It cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and the relevant price path are not reported. Even with 2.9% in annualized fee yield, break-even depends on future volume, the duration of the position, GTR's relative price movement, and how often the position remains in range.
It cannot be calculated from the supplied data because recent impermanent loss and the relevant price path are not reported. Even with 2.9% in annualized fee yield, break-even depends on future volume, the duration of the position, GTR's relative price movement, and how often the position remains in range.
