new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, below the Enter score of 15/100 and Hold score of 20/100, while the Exit score is 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT. That assessment is consistent with ai_engine=hold being outweighed by scanner=CRITICAL and a strong, unopposed EXIT signal. The pool ranks #2192 of 18146 raydium-amm pools, placing it in a weak relative position rather than merely reflecting low absolute yield. The assessment would improve only if sustained volume increased relative to TVL, liquidity deepened without a corresponding price-impact increase, and the critical scanner signal cleared; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or worsening execution would reinforce the exit view.
Computed 2026-11-09 12:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$26.40K
Total value locked
$8.27
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -0.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a narrow, actively monitored tick range and set an explicit exit rule: withdraw when volume remains near $8 while TVL remains near $26K, or when the scanner's critical condition persists. Do not leave the position unattended through a FRANK price move that takes the position outside its intended range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $8.27 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.02 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-frank pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12810 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18639 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-frank liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FRANK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, and the pool's low activity means those fees are limited.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 0.0% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component to cushion weak trading activity. Reward dependency and the remaining reward schedule are not established, making emission-decay assumptions unreliable; any future incentives should be treated as temporary rather than as a durable source of return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-FRANK carries high token-specific volatility, shallow-liquidity, and exit-slippage risk, particularly when SOL and FRANK move independently. With no current reward APR, emission decay is already reflected by the lack of incentives; exit timing should therefore be based on declining activity, worsening liquidity, or a loss of orderly price execution rather than on waiting for emissions to recover.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the pool's established Solana-side asset and has substantially deeper liquidity across the wider ecosystem than this pair. That external liquidity can make SOL relatively easier to price, but a large SOL move against FRANK can still create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss for this LP. SOL strength can leave the position holding more FRANK, while SOL weakness can produce the opposite effect.
tollfrank Context
FRANK is the memecoin-side asset and is likely to determine much of this pool's liquidity and execution risk. Its price action against SOL can be discontinuous, sentiment-driven, and more difficult to hedge in size than SOL. A sharp FRANK move or a collapse in its external liquidity can increase both impermanent-loss exposure and the cost of exiting the LP position.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and FRANK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a portion of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding the two tokens if their prices move apart, and the pool's low activity means those fees are limited.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7aVqsMvGWPXSKviy6iXi9rvS1dsTWji74cLvxgGF8hUb
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- frank (AYhFJk9Z…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently contributing a meaningful reward stream. The displayed 0.0% is supported by a fee-only APR of 0.0%, and future emissions should not be treated as dependable income.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so emission decay is not presently contributing a meaningful reward stream. The displayed 0.0% is supported by a fee-only APR of 0.0%, and future emissions should not be treated as dependable income.
Because the reward-only APR is already 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward component from the quoted return. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.0% and constrained by $8 of 24-hour volume.
Because the reward-only APR is already 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward component from the quoted return. The remaining return would depend on trading fees, currently represented by 0.0% and constrained by $8 of 24-hour volume.
Risk is high because FRANK can move sharply against SOL, while $26K of liquidity and $8 of daily volume may not support orderly exits during stress. The pool is also flagged CRITICAL by the scanner, and recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are unavailable.
Risk is high because FRANK can move sharply against SOL, while $26K of liquidity and $8 of daily volume may not support orderly exits during stress. The pool is also flagged CRITICAL by the scanner, and recent impermanent-loss and range-history measurements are unavailable.
For SOL-FRANK, an exit is reasonable when the critical scanner condition persists, volume does not improve from $8, or liquidity falls from $26K. A sharp FRANK move outside the intended range or materially worse execution is also a concrete exit trigger.
For SOL-FRANK, an exit is reasonable when the critical scanner condition persists, volume does not improve from $8, or liquidity falls from $26K. A sharp FRANK move outside the intended range or materially worse execution is also a concrete exit trigger.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and volume is limited. At a fee-only APR of 0.0%, recovery depends on sustained trading fees and price convergence; a prolonged divergence between SOL and FRANK can outpace that income.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and volume is limited. At a fee-only APR of 0.0%, recovery depends on sustained trading fees and price convergence; a prolonged divergence between SOL and FRANK can outpace that income.
