new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 56/100 with Enter 53/100 / Hold 61/100 / Exit 21/100 and live verdict HOLD supports holding an existing position rather than treating the pool as an automatic new entry. Its #100-of-3343 rank among meteora-dlmm pools places it relatively high in the listed set, but the verdict drivers are mixed: short-term TVL contraction was followed by stronger two-week recovery, indicating a round-trip, and the bleed cap was skipped. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains again, fee volume falls, or the fee-derived APR collapses; it would strengthen if liquidity and fee flow remain stable without relying on emissions.
Computed 2026-10-28 01:05 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$120.25K
Total value locked
$221.60K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1729.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a wider-than-stablecoin range centered on the current SAPLING/SOL price, and rebalance only when price leaves that range; exit if liquidity drains or fee volume no longer supports the position after the memecoin move. Because recent range utilization is unreported, avoid assuming that the current range is being used efficiently.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $221.60K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.72K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SAPLING-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#187 of 4449 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1627 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SAPLING-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SAPLING and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn trading fees, but a large SAPLING price move can leave you with more of the weaker asset and make your result worse than simply holding SOL.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100%. Reward dependency is not classified, and there is no stated reward timetable, so the displayed APR should be evaluated primarily as trading-fee income rather than as a durable emission stream.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not provided, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from this data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SAPLING-SOL is exposed to abrupt SAPLING repricing, thin or shifting liquidity, and adverse selection when the token moves sharply against SOL. Emission decay is also relevant: if incentives are introduced or later decline, exit timing must be based on fee flow and liquidity conditions rather than assuming the current APR persists.
tollSAPLING Context
SAPLING is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement drives most directional inventory changes for the LP. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp SAPLING move can leave the position holding more of the depreciating asset while fees offset only part of the loss. SAPLING-specific volatility therefore matters more than the headline APR when assessing this position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the quote-side asset and the comparatively established unit against which SAPLING exposure is measured in this pool. SOL strength or weakness changes the pair price and can move a concentrated position out of its active range, while SOL liquidity elsewhere may make rebalancing easier than for SAPLING. The LP still bears the opportunity cost of holding inventory in both assets instead of SOL alone.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SAPLING and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You earn trading fees, but a large SAPLING price move can leave you with more of the weaker asset and make your result worse than simply holding SOL.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7hvn8egrNGkpQFGyziHxvGkJFWtmoCyXmYYXp4V7tszd
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SAPLING (BZFYNPeQ…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 10/2/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
APR
2%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The displayed APR is 500.0%, made up of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the current yield is fee-based and reward timing is not stated, emission decay is mainly a contingency: any future reward stream could fall while fee income depends on $222K and trading demand.
The displayed APR is 500.0%, made up of 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the current yield is fee-based and reward timing is not stated, emission decay is mainly a contingency: any future reward stream could fall while fee income depends on $222K and trading demand.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not by itself explain the present fee-derived yield. If rewards are later added and then expire, the pool's return would depend on 500.0%, 100%, and whether volume remains sufficient relative to $120K.
There is currently no stated reward contribution beyond 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not by itself explain the present fee-derived yield. If rewards are later added and then expire, the pool's return would depend on 500.0%, 100%, and whether volume remains sufficient relative to $120K.
Risk is high and path-dependent: $120K of liquidity supports $222K of daily volume, while SAPLING can reprice sharply against SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-use readings are unavailable, so the size of realized loss cannot be inferred from the dashboard.
Risk is high and path-dependent: $120K of liquidity supports $222K of daily volume, while SAPLING can reprice sharply against SOL. Recent impermanent-loss and range-use readings are unavailable, so the size of realized loss cannot be inferred from the dashboard.
For SAPLING-SOL, consider exiting when TVL resumes a sustained decline, fee volume no longer supports 500.0%, or SAPLING leaves the intended range and the position accumulates unwanted inventory. The current round-trip TVL pattern argues for monitoring the next liquidity trend rather than using the present HOLD as a permanent signal.
For SAPLING-SOL, consider exiting when TVL resumes a sustained decline, fee volume no longer supports 500.0%, or SAPLING leaves the intended range and the position accumulates unwanted inventory. The current round-trip TVL pattern argues for monitoring the next liquidity trend rather than using the present HOLD as a permanent signal.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future price paths are unknown. Fees accrue at 500.0%, but they offset loss only if trading activity and the SAPLING/SOL price relationship remain favorable; 500.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future price paths are unknown. Fees accrue at 500.0%, but they offset loss only if trading activity and the SAPLING/SOL price relationship remain favorable; 500.0% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery schedule.
