new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 assigns Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. That assessment is consistent with ai_engine=hold, scanner=CRITICAL, and a strong unopposed EXIT signal: the pool ranks #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, while its low activity provides limited fee support. The assessment could improve with sustained volume growth, deeper TVL, and a scanner downgrade supported by recurring fee generation; a TVL drain, weaker trading activity, or further yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-10 10:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$312.09K
Total value locked
$570.59
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 0.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering, use a full-range position or a deliberately wide concentrated range, and set an exit rule for a further TVL drain, persistently weak swap flow, or a scanner status that remains CRITICAL; do not wait for emissions to improve the position.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $570.59 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.43 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SLOTH-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12331 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18026 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SLOTH-SOL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SLOTH and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and the current fee income is small relative to the pool's liquidity.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, for total APR of 0.2%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so the return depends on actual swap flow rather than emissions. Reward dependency and any time-bound reward schedule are not established here; the current reward contribution is zero according to the displayed APR breakdown.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range exposure are not available for this pool, so realized IL and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SLOTH can experience sharp price moves against SOL, creating inventory divergence and adverse selection for LPs. Emission decay is an additional family-level concern: with no current reward contribution, there is little incentive buffer, making exit timing dependent on fee activity, liquidity conditions, and SLOTH price behavior.
tollSLOTH Context
SLOTH is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement determines how much of the LP position is converted away from SLOTH and toward SOL during rebalancing by the AMM. Liquidity depth for SLOTH outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; thinner external liquidity would increase the risk of price gaps and difficult exits.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the reference asset in the pair and generally provides the less speculative side relative to SLOTH, but SOL volatility still changes the pair price and can generate impermanent loss. The LP's result depends on SLOTH performance relative to SOL, not on the direction of either asset in isolation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SLOTH and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the asset that performs worse, and the current fee income is small relative to the pool's liquidity.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 7mtJbVNEtejYmCLRriwQhymZdzn4wGRFTvTZ5721b4BD
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SLOTH (HQ7DaoiU…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
17%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, but the current reward contribution is 0.0% and total APR is 0.2%. The pool therefore has little emissions-based APR to lose; its stated yield is primarily the 0.2% fee component.
Emission decay would reduce the reward component, but the current reward contribution is 0.0% and total APR is 0.2%. The pool therefore has little emissions-based APR to lose; its stated yield is primarily the 0.2% fee component.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not currently remove a material reward stream. After expiry, returns would depend on 0.2% in trading fees, which is constrained by the pool's 0.00x volume/TVL activity.
Because the current reward component is 0.0%, incentive expiry would not currently remove a material reward stream. After expiry, returns would depend on 0.2% in trading fees, which is constrained by the pool's 0.00x volume/TVL activity.
Risk is high relative to a plain SOL exposure because SLOTH can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss. The pool also has a 0.00x volume/TVL ratio and a live EXIT assessment, so fee income may not compensate for adverse price movement.
Risk is high relative to a plain SOL exposure because SLOTH can move sharply against SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss. The pool also has a 0.00x volume/TVL ratio and a live EXIT assessment, so fee income may not compensate for adverse price movement.
For this pool, an exit rule should respond to a further TVL drain, persistently weak trading flow, or continued CRITICAL scanner status rather than waiting for rewards. The current live verdict is EXIT, with fee-based yield of 0.2% and total APR of 0.2%.
For this pool, an exit rule should respond to a further TVL drain, persistently weak trading flow, or continued CRITICAL scanner status rather than waiting for rewards. The current live verdict is EXIT, with fee-based yield of 0.2% and total APR of 0.2%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.2% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fee income and stable relative pricing between SLOTH and SOL, and could be prolonged if SLOTH falls sharply.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. At 0.2% fee-only APR, recovery would require sustained fee income and stable relative pricing between SLOTH and SOL, and could be prolonged if SLOTH falls sharply.
