SOL-APEon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $88.81K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $61.84K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 88v4aoey…VJrn · observed 2026-11-12
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 places SOL-APE in a middle-risk, middle-opportunity range rather than among the strongest pools. Enter 45/100 / Hold 58/100 / Exit 23/100 and the live verdict HOLD indicate that the ai_engine currently favors holding existing exposure over initiating or fully exiting it. Its #1514-of-9963 rank among raydium-clmm pools gives it a measurable but not top-tier position, while the fee-funded return profile and 0.70x turnover are offset by limited depth and memecoin volatility. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sustained volume decline, or worsening price divergence would change the assessment toward exit; stronger and persistent liquidity and fee activity would support a more favorable assessment.
Computed 2026-11-12 19:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$88.81K
Total value locked
$61.84K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 130.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a concentrated range that you can monitor and rebalance when either SOL or APE reaches a range boundary; if the position remains one-sided after a rebalance or fee income weakens materially, reduce exposure rather than waiting for the pair to mean-revert.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 269.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $61.84K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $752.77 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-APE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#505 of 20367 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3895 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-APE liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and APE into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you get back can change as their prices move, and the pool's small size can make earnings and exits less predictable.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported yield decomposes into 269.8% fee APR and 230.2% reward APR, with 54% of yield sourced from trading fees. This makes current returns dependent on swap activity rather than a stated emissions schedule. Reward duration cannot be projected from the available pool data, so any future reward contribution should be treated as uncertain.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are not currently reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-APE carries high sensitivity to SOL-APE price divergence, liquidity withdrawals, and abrupt changes in trader interest. Emission decay is not the current source of reported yield, but exit timing still matters because fee income can fall quickly when memecoin volume fades; LPs should not assume the current fee rate persists.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than this pool. SOL price movements relative to APE create the principal source of LP inventory divergence: a strong move in either direction can leave the position holding a different SOL-APE mix than was deposited. The pool's limited TVL means larger trades can also influence the price path more than they would in deeper SOL venues.
tollAPE Context
APE is the memecoin-side asset and its liquidity and demand are more dependent on venue-specific sentiment than SOL's. APE rallies or selloffs against SOL can move the position toward one token and increase exposure to the asset losing relative demand. Because APE activity can contract quickly, fee generation may decline before an LP can reposition.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and APE into a shared trading pool so other people can swap between them. You earn part of the trading fees, but the amount of each token you get back can change as their prices move, and the pool's small size can make earnings and exits less predictable.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 88v4aoey74npmh3yJS9PWfzWFnuxAyZRkeTLveY7VJrn
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- APE (C1MHyoTJ…)
- Created
- 9/25/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reported yield is split between 269.8% in fees and 230.2% in rewards, so the present APR of 500.0% is not currently dependent on a stated reward-emission stream. Fee income can still decline if trading activity falls, and any later reward program could introduce emission decay.
Current reported yield is split between 269.8% in fees and 230.2% in rewards, so the present APR of 500.0% is not currently dependent on a stated reward-emission stream. Fee income can still decline if trading activity falls, and any later reward program could introduce emission decay.
Because reward-only APR is 230.2%, expiry of a current reward program would not directly remove the reported source of yield. The remaining return would be 269.8% from trading fees, which depends on future volume and liquidity.
Because reward-only APR is 230.2%, expiry of a current reward program would not directly remove the reported source of yield. The remaining return would be 269.8% from trading fees, which depends on future volume and liquidity.
Risk is elevated because APE can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has only $89K of liquidity. The current 0.70x turnover supports fee generation, but a volume decline can reduce fee income quickly and price divergence can change the token mix you hold.
Risk is elevated because APE can move sharply against SOL, while the pool has only $89K of liquidity. The current 0.70x turnover supports fee generation, but a volume decline can reduce fee income quickly and price divergence can change the token mix you hold.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for your expected price-divergence loss, when the position stays one-sided after reaching a range boundary, or when TVL and trading activity deteriorate materially. A sustained drop from 0.70x turnover or a collapse in 269.8% would be a concrete warning.
Consider exiting when fee income no longer compensates for your expected price-divergence loss, when the position stays one-sided after reaching a range boundary, or when TVL and trading activity deteriorate materially. A sustained drop from 0.70x turnover or a collapse in 269.8% would be a concrete warning.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization data are not currently reported. Fee accrual of 269.8% could offset divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-APE price paths, and whether the position remains active in its range.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss and range-utilization data are not currently reported. Fee accrual of 269.8% could offset divergence over time, but the result depends on future volume, SOL-APE price paths, and whether the position remains active in its range.
