GLDx-IDLEon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $44.16K
- APR
- 28.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $3.61K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- 8aEJHazm…apgf · observed 2026-10-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT, driven by ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #1337 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools. In practical terms, the data supports monitoring an existing position more than adding aggressively: the yield is fee-funded, but the pool's memecoin exposure, limited recent turnover, and unverified range and impermanent-loss history leave material uncertainty. A TVL drain, sustained volume decline, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; durable volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-10-26 12:16 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$44.16K
Total value locked
$3.61K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up28.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 32.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrower, actively monitored range rather than leaving the position unattended; rebalance when the GLDX/IDLE price approaches either range boundary, and exit if volume weakens materially while the position becomes one-sided.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 28.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 25.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $3.61K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $36.08 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 GLDx-IDLE pools
by AI Farmer Score
#411 of 19497 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2821 of 148664
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GLDx-IDLE liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and IDLE into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other than if you had simply held both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported APR consists of 25.2% from trading fees and 3.5% from rewards. 88% of yield comes from trading fees, so the current return is not dependent on farm emissions; however, it remains sensitive to volume and liquidity conditions. Reward duration is not established, so no time-based reward runway can be assumed.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is not established, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GLDX-IDLE is exposed to abrupt price moves, asymmetric token demand, shallow exit liquidity, and concentrated-liquidity rebalancing risk. Emission decay is less relevant to the current fee-only yield, but any future incentives could decline quickly; exit timing matters because leaving after a one-sided move may crystallize inventory imbalance and impermanent loss.
tollGLDx Context
GLDX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity position and appears to be the pool's memecoin exposure. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established here, so a price move in GLDX can widen execution costs and make the LP's inventory increasingly one-sided. GLDX appreciation or depreciation relative to IDLE changes both fee generation and the composition of the position.
tollIDLE Context
IDLE is the paired asset against GLDX and provides the reference side for the pool's price range. Its broader liquidity depth is not established here, so IDLE price movement can also affect exit quality and inventory balance. A sustained move in IDLE relative to GLDX can push liquidity out of range and reduce fee capture until the position is repositioned.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GLDX and IDLE into a price range so traders can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but a large price move can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other than if you had simply held both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8aEJHazmjD4RG3X7kQu7qCnXnX4Hn2dFMKAe3UT5apgf
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GLDx (Xsv9hRk1…)
- Token B
- IDLE (BjcRmwm8…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current pool yield is shown as 25.2% in fees and 3.5% in rewards, with 88% from trading fees. Because the reported reward component is zero, emission decay does not currently explain the APR, but any future incentive program could decline and reduce total returns.
The current pool yield is shown as 25.2% in fees and 3.5% in rewards, with 88% from trading fees. Because the reported reward component is zero, emission decay does not currently explain the APR, but any future incentive program could decline and reduce total returns.
The pool currently reports 3.5% in reward APR, so there is no stated reward stream to expire. If incentives are later introduced and then end, total APR would rely on 25.2% in trading fees, which depends on actual volume rather than scheduled emissions.
The pool currently reports 3.5% in reward APR, so there is no stated reward stream to expire. If incentives are later introduced and then end, total APR would rely on 25.2% in trading fees, which depends on actual volume rather than scheduled emissions.
Risk is elevated because GLDX can move sharply against IDLE, while the pool has $44K and only $4K in recent volume. The reported N/A and N/A do not establish recent loss or range behavior, so price divergence and exit liquidity should be treated as uncertain.
Risk is elevated because GLDX can move sharply against IDLE, while the pool has $44K and only $4K in recent volume. The reported N/A and N/A do not establish recent loss or range behavior, so price divergence and exit liquidity should be treated as uncertain.
Consider exiting when GLDX or IDLE makes a sharp directional move, when the position becomes one-sided, or when fee generation no longer compensates for concentrated-liquidity risk. For this pool, a sustained drop from 25.2% fee APR or deterioration in the 0.08x Vol/TVL ratio would be a concrete warning.
Consider exiting when GLDX or IDLE makes a sharp directional move, when the position becomes one-sided, or when fee generation no longer compensates for concentrated-liquidity risk. For this pool, a sustained drop from 25.2% fee APR or deterioration in the 0.08x Vol/TVL ratio would be a concrete warning.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not established and fee income changes with volume. The reported 25.2% is an annualized fee figure, not a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on future GLDX-IDLE price divergence, time in range, and realized fees.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not established and fee income changes with volume. The reported 25.2% is an annualized fee figure, not a guaranteed recovery rate; actual break-even depends on future GLDX-IDLE price divergence, time in range, and realized fees.
