new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 42/100 with Enter 36/100 / Hold 50/100 / Exit 31/100 and live verdict HOLD means the model does not justify opening or maintaining the position under current conditions. The strong EXIT signal is unopposed, and the pool ranks #1002 of 2612 meteora-dlmm pools, placing it below most ranked alternatives. The assessment would change if sustained trading volume raised fee quality without a corresponding TVL drain, or if the exit signal weakened; it would deteriorate further with a TVL loss, volume contraction, or fee-yield collapse.
Computed 2026-11-03 14:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$21.06K
Total value locked
$533.53
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up14.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -49.5%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with active range monitoring: set a narrow range around the current USELESS-USDC price, rebalance when price leaves that range or when volume-to-TVL weakens materially, and exit if the live verdict remains EXIT after a visible TVL drain or fee collapse.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 14.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 13.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $533.53 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.84 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 11 USELESS-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#972 of 4541 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5887 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the USELESS-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing USELESS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large USELESS price moves can leave you with more of the weaker asset and reduce your result compared with simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 13.9% fee APR and 1.0% reward APR, with 93% of yield from trading fees. Reward duration is not established, so emission decay and any future change in reward contribution cannot be quantified. The current APR therefore depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be evaluated from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, USELESS-USDC carries material price-dislocation risk: a sharp USELESS move can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss, while declining attention can reduce fee flow. Emission decay is an additional family-specific concern if incentives are introduced later, making exit timing important when volume or liquidity deteriorates.
tollUSELESS Context
USELESS is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quote asset. No cross-venue liquidity-depth comparison for USELESS is supplied; its price action is therefore the main driver of inventory divergence, rebalancing needs, and impermanent-loss exposure for this LP.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the stable reference leg against which USELESS is priced. USDC generally has deeper liquidity across Solana markets, but no pool-specific cross-venue depth comparison is supplied; a USDC depeg would add risk beyond USELESS volatility and could distort the pair's fee economics.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing USELESS and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large USELESS price moves can leave you with more of the weaker asset and reduce your result compared with simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8bCaqhnpeeVXXbx7oHyytsWecpHoiXhqeRBEdMEwEu7n
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- USELESS (Dz9mQ9Nz…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
3%
APR
3%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The pool currently shows 14.9% total APR, consisting of 13.9% in fees and 1.0% in rewards, with 93% sourced from trading fees. Because reward duration is not established and the current reward component is absent, emission decay is not the present APR driver, but any future incentives could decline over time.
The pool currently shows 14.9% total APR, consisting of 13.9% in fees and 1.0% in rewards, with 93% sourced from trading fees. Because reward duration is not established and the current reward component is absent, emission decay is not the present APR driver, but any future incentives could decline over time.
There is no identified reward contribution in the current decomposition, so expiry would not remove the displayed fee component of 14.9%. If incentives are later added, their expiry would leave fee income as the remaining source, and the result would depend on whether trading volume of $534 persists relative to $21K.
There is no identified reward contribution in the current decomposition, so expiry would not remove the displayed fee component of 14.9%. If incentives are later added, their expiry would leave fee income as the remaining source, and the result would depend on whether trading volume of $534 persists relative to $21K.
Risk is elevated because USELESS can move sharply and the pool belongs to the MEMECOIN family. The pool has $21K of liquidity and a 0.03x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable, so the realized loss profile cannot be verified.
Risk is elevated because USELESS can move sharply and the pool belongs to the MEMECOIN family. The pool has $21K of liquidity and a 0.03x volume-to-TVL ratio, but recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable, so the realized loss profile cannot be verified.
For this pool, an exit is particularly defensible if the live verdict remains HOLD, TVL drains, or fee flow falls materially from 13.9%. Also consider exiting when USELESS leaves the chosen range and active rebalancing is no longer justified by trading volume.
For this pool, an exit is particularly defensible if the live verdict remains HOLD, TVL drains, or fee flow falls materially from 13.9%. Also consider exiting when USELESS leaves the chosen range and active rebalancing is no longer justified by trading volume.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fee recovery would depend on 13.9%, sustained volume of $534, and whether USELESS prices retrace enough to reduce the position's inventory divergence.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable. Fee recovery would depend on 13.9%, sustained volume of $534, and whether USELESS prices retrace enough to reduce the position's inventory divergence.
