new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 59/100, with Enter at 55/100, Hold at 64/100, and Exit at 18/100; the live verdict is HOLD. That combination supports holding an existing position rather than treating the pool as an unrestricted new allocation: the pool ranks #44 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools, while ai_engine=enter is offset by scanner=WARN and promotion to INCREASE remains pending the required dwell period. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee APR collapses, XHYPE liquidity deteriorates, or the scanner warning persists; it would strengthen if fee generation remains stable and the warning clears.
Computed 2026-11-02 16:47 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$189.77K
Total value locked
$90.59K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 311.6%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current XHYPE-USDC price only if you can monitor it at least daily; use 0.48x as the activity baseline and exit or reset the position if the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio remains materially below that baseline or fee APR falls materially below 321.0%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 321.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $90.59K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.66K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 7 xHYPE-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#171 of 4492 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1537 of 152129
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the xHYPE-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing XHYPE and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive trading fees, but large XHYPE price moves can leave you with a different mix of coins and less value than simply holding both separately.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Total APR of 500.0% decomposes into fee APR of 321.0% and reward APR of 179.0%. Fee sustainability is 64%, so the reported yield currently comes from swaps rather than emissions. Reward dependency is not established; any future incentive component would be subject to emission decay and could change the headline APR without a corresponding change in trading-fee revenue.
shieldRisk Assessment
No seven-day impermanent-loss reading or tick-in-range history is available, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, XHYPE-USDC carries concentrated-token risk: a sharp XHYPE move can create impermanent loss, leave the position predominantly in one asset, and reduce future fee generation. Emission decay is not the current yield driver, but exit timing still matters because memecoin liquidity and trading activity can contract quickly after attention fades.
tollxHYPE Context
XHYPE is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the accounting and settlement side of the position. Liquidity depth for XHYPE elsewhere is not provided here, so a thin external market could increase slippage and amplify the effect of XHYPE price moves on this LP. A sustained XHYPE rally or selloff can also push a concentrated position out of its effective range and alter the asset mix received by the LP.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the relatively stable quote asset in XHYPE-USDC and is intended to preserve dollar-denominated value while absorbing XHYPE-side price movement. USDC liquidity elsewhere is generally broader than that of a memecoin, but this pool's own TVL is $190K and should not be treated as equivalent to deep USDC market liquidity. When XHYPE falls, the LP can accumulate more XHYPE against its USDC exposure; when XHYPE rises, it can become more USDC-heavy after selling XHYPE into demand.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing XHYPE and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive trading fees, but large XHYPE price moves can leave you with a different mix of coins and less value than simply holding both separately.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8tp8GJADuYu2czhnaWzXYxpXTq2dwjribGwSav4J4m7e
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- xHYPE (7ga6rtE9…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 8/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
3%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reported APR is 500.0%, made up of 321.0% in fees and 179.0% in rewards, so the stated yield is currently fee-driven. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce that reward component over time without necessarily reducing swap-fee revenue.
The current reported APR is 500.0%, made up of 321.0% in fees and 179.0% in rewards, so the stated yield is currently fee-driven. If emissions are added later, decay would reduce that reward component over time without necessarily reducing swap-fee revenue.
The supplied metrics show 179.0% in reward APR, so there is no current reward contribution to remove from the reported total. If a separate incentive program expires, the affected reward portion would disappear and the remaining APR would depend on 321.0% in trading fees.
The supplied metrics show 179.0% in reward APR, so there is no current reward contribution to remove from the reported total. If a separate incentive program expires, the affected reward portion would disappear and the remaining APR would depend on 321.0% in trading fees.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because XHYPE can move sharply, producing impermanent loss and changing the asset mix held by the LP. The pool's TVL is $190K, its volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.48x, and recent seven-day IL and range-history readings are unavailable.
Risk is high relative to a stablecoin pair because XHYPE can move sharply, producing impermanent loss and changing the asset mix held by the LP. The pool's TVL is $190K, its volume-to-TVL ratio is 0.48x, and recent seven-day IL and range-history readings are unavailable.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee generation falls materially below 321.0%, the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.48x, TVL begins draining, or the scanner warning remains unresolved. An exit may also be appropriate when the XHYPE price move leaves the position outside its intended range or gives you an unacceptable asset imbalance.
For this pool, consider exiting when fee generation falls materially below 321.0%, the rolling volume-to-TVL ratio deteriorates from 0.48x, TVL begins draining, or the scanner warning remains unresolved. An exit may also be appropriate when the XHYPE price move leaves the position outside its intended range or gives you an unacceptable asset imbalance.
It cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Break-even depends on how long 321.0% in annualized fees persists, the size of the price divergence, and whether the position remains in range.
It cannot be calculated reliably because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Break-even depends on how long 321.0% in annualized fees persists, the size of the price divergence, and whether the position remains in range.
