Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 58% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 19/100, below the Enter threshold of 10/100 and Hold threshold of 30/100, while the Exit threshold is 60/100. The live verdict is AVOID because the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine is only hold, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it well below the broad pool set; the assessment would improve only if trading volume and fee generation became persistent and the scanner cleared, while a TVL drain or yield collapse would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-11-11 12:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$177.82K
Total value locked
$2.45K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -2.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the AVOID signal, set a predetermined exit trigger based on further deterioration in volume or liquidity and do not treat the current fee rate as sufficient compensation for a DORA price shock; exit promptly if the scanner's critical status persists or worsens.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $2.45K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.12 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-DORA pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12251 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17893 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-DORA liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DORA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding SOL and DORA if their prices move apart, and the current return is 1.4%.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The pool's return decomposes into 1.4% fee-only APR and 0.0% reward-only APR. 99% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component cushioning low swap activity. Reward dependency is not established, and any future emissions should be treated as subject to decay rather than as a durable return source.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss data is not available for this pool, and tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a memecoin pool, SOL-DORA carries sharp price-dislocation risk, while emission decay can reduce any supplemental incentives and make exit timing more important. The low 0.01x turnover ratio also means fee generation may not compensate for adverse SOL-DORA price moves.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than this pool. SOL price movement changes the relative value of the deposit: a sustained move against DORA can create inventory divergence and reduce the LP's exposure to the outperforming asset.
tollDORA Context
DORA is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more concentrated than SOL's outside this pool. A sharp DORA move can increase impermanent-loss exposure, while thin external liquidity can make rebalancing or exiting more costly than the fee rate suggests.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and DORA into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become worth less than simply holding SOL and DORA if their prices move apart, and the current return is 1.4%.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 8zeP7sqNXpPcoUXMhDWb7eNSy7aZQCvEALr1JuijdckX
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- DORA (3yhsQKMe…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so present returns are generated by 1.4% in fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce total APR without any change in the pool's trading activity.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so present returns are generated by 1.4% in fees rather than emissions. If incentives are introduced later, emission decay could reduce total APR without any change in the pool's trading activity.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 99%, an incentive expiry would leave the pool reliant on trading fees. With 0.01x turnover and 1.4% total APR currently, the remaining return would depend on whether swap volume increases or falls.
Because the current reward-only APR is 0.0% and fee sustainability is 99%, an incentive expiry would leave the pool reliant on trading fees. With 0.01x turnover and 1.4% total APR currently, the remaining return would depend on whether swap volume increases or falls.
Risk is material because DORA can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has $178K TVL with 0.01x turnover. The current AVOID verdict and critical scanner status indicate that the fee stream should not be treated as protection against price divergence.
Risk is material because DORA can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has $178K TVL with 0.01x turnover. The current AVOID verdict and critical scanner status indicate that the fee stream should not be treated as protection against price divergence.
For SOL-DORA, an exit is most defensible when the critical scanner status persists, volume weakens, or liquidity begins to drain, consistent with the current AVOID verdict. Do not wait for incentives to recover a position if the fee stream is no longer compensating for DORA price risk.
For SOL-DORA, an exit is most defensible when the critical scanner status persists, volume weakens, or liquidity begins to drain, consistent with the current AVOID verdict. Do not wait for incentives to recover a position if the fee stream is no longer compensating for DORA price risk.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. At 1.4% total APR, fee accumulation alone does not establish when any price-divergence loss would be recovered.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee income varies with trading volume. At 1.4% total APR, fee accumulation alone does not establish when any price-divergence loss would be recovered.
