new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 49/100 Wealthville Score, with Enter 43/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 24/100, produces a live HOLD verdict from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #387 among 2403 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools, but the score should not be read as strong yield confirmation: $120K, 0.01x activity, and fee-only economics leave the pool dependent on continued trading. A TVL drain, further volume decline, or collapse in 1.4% would weaken the assessment; sustained volume growth and deeper liquidity would improve it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$119.72K
Total value locked
$1.78K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.4%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -10.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a defined exit trigger: remove liquidity if PVS liquidity or swap activity deteriorates materially, or if the position leaves the intended active range; with 0.01x activity relative to liquidity, review the position at least weekly rather than assuming fees will compound automatically.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.4% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.78K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $4.46 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 SOL-PVS pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5457 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #8520 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-PVS liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PVS into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can contain more of the token that fell in price, and the current return is only 1.4%.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into 1.4% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% means current LP yield does not depend on an emissions program, and no reward-duration estimate is available; if incentives are introduced later, their emission decay and expiration would reduce the reward component without changing the fee economics.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range coverage are not currently available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-PVS carries sharper token-price and liquidity-exit risk than a major-asset pair; emission decay is not currently the main risk because reward yield is absent, but any future incentive should be treated as temporary and reassessed before it decays or ends.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid reference asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than PVS. If SOL moves sharply while PVS does not, or vice versa, the pool rebalances toward the outperforming asset, changing the LP's inventory and potentially crystallizing underperformance versus simply holding the tokens.
tollPVS Context
PVS is the memecoin leg and is likely to determine much of the position's tail risk through price gaps, thin liquidity, and sudden demand changes. A PVS selloff can leave the LP holding more PVS while fees accrue at 1.4%, so fee income may not compensate for rapid token depreciation.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and PVS into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but your final holdings can contain more of the token that fell in price, and the current return is only 1.4%.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 98nocLbiDi9ykAjwAUJW9fnYZsf4L4KLCfH7U2LFXDsv
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- PVS (FWAr6oWa…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently account for the pool's yield. If rewards are added later, the total APR could fall from 1.4% as those emissions decline, unless trading fees at 1.4% rise.
The current reward component is 0.0%, so emission decay does not currently account for the pool's yield. If rewards are added later, the total APR could fall from 1.4% as those emissions decline, unless trading fees at 1.4% rise.
Because current rewards contribute 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream; the remaining return would be trading fees of 1.4%. If temporary incentives are introduced, their expiry would make the pool more dependent on its 99% fee-funded economics.
Because current rewards contribute 0.0%, expiration would not remove a current reward stream; the remaining return would be trading fees of 1.4%. If temporary incentives are introduced, their expiry would make the pool more dependent on its 99% fee-funded economics.
The main risks are PVS price collapse, limited exit liquidity, and holding more PVS after it underperforms SOL. The pool has $120K in liquidity, 0.01x volume relative to liquidity, and 1.4% total APR, so fees may be too limited to offset a rapid memecoin move.
The main risks are PVS price collapse, limited exit liquidity, and holding more PVS after it underperforms SOL. The pool has $120K in liquidity, 0.01x volume relative to liquidity, and 1.4% total APR, so fees may be too limited to offset a rapid memecoin move.
For SOL-PVS, consider exiting when PVS liquidity or trading activity falls materially, when the position leaves its intended range, or when 1.4% no longer compensates for the token and inventory risk. A persistent TVL drain is a stronger exit signal than a short-lived volume fluctuation.
For SOL-PVS, consider exiting when PVS liquidity or trading activity falls materially, when the position leaves its intended range, or when 1.4% no longer compensates for the token and inventory risk. A persistent TVL drain is a stronger exit signal than a short-lived volume fluctuation.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data and range coverage are unavailable. At the current fee economics, any recovery depends on fees at 1.4% and the future relative prices of SOL and PVS; a sharp PVS decline may not be offset by fee income.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because recent impermanent-loss data and range coverage are unavailable. At the current fee economics, any recovery depends on fees at 1.4% and the future relative prices of SOL and PVS; a sharp PVS decline may not be offset by fee income.
