new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 47/100 with Enter 40/100, Hold 56/100, and Exit 23/100 indicates that this pool is assessed as an exit candidate rather than a new LP allocation. The live verdict is HOLD: the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine is HOLD, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Its rank of #1710 among 24532 raydium-amm pools places it well outside the stronger part of the pool set. The assessment would change if sustained volume materially increased relative to TVL, liquidity deepened without a corresponding fee-yield collapse, or the critical scanner condition were removed; a TVL drain or further yield deterioration would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-11-10 17:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$330.80K
Total value locked
$4.18K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow, actively monitored SOL/LION range and rebalance only when price leaves that range; exit if the live verdict remains HOLD while TVL drains or trading volume fails to improve, because fee income is the sole identified yield source.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $4.18K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $10.44 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-LION pools
by AI Farmer Score
#11862 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 11% of all Solana pools
overall rank #17078 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-LION liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LION into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and the current pool activity provides only limited fee income.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The total APR of 1.0% decomposes into 1.0% from trading fees and 0.0% from incentives. Fee sustainability is 99%, so the return is not currently dependent on an identified reward stream; reward dependency remains uncertain. With limited volume relative to liquidity, fee generation can remain weak even when the quoted fee APR is entirely trading-derived.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are unavailable, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-LION carries substantial token-specific volatility and liquidity-concentration risk: SOL/LION divergence can produce impermanent loss, while emission decay can remove any temporary incentive support. Exit timing matters because a declining LION market can reduce both swap activity and the ability to exit without additional price impact.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and has materially broader liquidity across Solana venues than LION. For this LP, a SOL rally or selloff relative to LION changes the pool composition through rebalancing and can create impermanent loss even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere.
tollLION Context
LION is the memecoin exposure and is likely to be more dependent on this pool and a smaller set of venues for liquidity than SOL. Sharp LION price moves, falling market depth, or fading attention can increase divergence from SOL and make the position harder to unwind at the intended price.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and LION into a shared pool so other people can swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes between the two tokens can leave you with less value than simply holding them, and the current pool activity provides only limited fee income.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9SxEcmwzHtSZu2jJSpSxuyxweYECvvtykoP3qtEprkvj
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- LION (7kN5FQMD…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
17%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Any declining incentive emissions would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, but the stated total APR of 1.0% is already composed primarily of fee income at 1.0%. Because reward duration is not established, the timing of any emission effect cannot be quantified.
Any declining incentive emissions would reduce the reward component, currently represented by 0.0%, but the stated total APR of 1.0% is already composed primarily of fee income at 1.0%. Because reward duration is not established, the timing of any emission effect cannot be quantified.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the basis for returns. Since 0.0% is currently the reward-only APR and fee sustainability is 99%, post-incentive performance would depend on whether $4K supports fee generation against $331K.
The reward component would fall away, leaving trading fees as the basis for returns. Since 0.0% is currently the reward-only APR and fee sustainability is 99%, post-incentive performance would depend on whether $4K supports fee generation against $331K.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because LION can move sharply, lose liquidity, or diverge from SOL. That can create impermanent loss and exit slippage; the pool's low activity, with Vol/TVL at 0.01x, provides limited evidence of strong fee compensation.
Risk is high relative to a major-asset pair because LION can move sharply, lose liquidity, or diverge from SOL. That can create impermanent loss and exit slippage; the pool's low activity, with Vol/TVL at 0.01x, provides limited evidence of strong fee compensation.
For SOL-LION, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains HOLD, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or TVL and volume deteriorate. A move outside the selected price range, weakening LION liquidity, or an unopposed exit signal should be treated as a trigger to reassess rather than waiting for emissions to decay further.
For SOL-LION, an exit is more defensible when the live verdict remains HOLD, the scanner remains CRITICAL, or TVL and volume deteriorate. A move outside the selected price range, weakening LION liquidity, or an unopposed exit signal should be treated as a trigger to reassess rather than waiting for emissions to decay further.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable. At the current fee-only rate of 1.0%, fees would need to accumulate for the price divergence loss to be recovered, and that period could lengthen if $4K remains low relative to $331K.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range-utilization data are unavailable. At the current fee-only rate of 1.0%, fees would need to accumulate for the price divergence loss to be recovered, and that period could lengthen if $4K remains low relative to $331K.
