Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 56% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 19/100 produces an Enter score of 10/100, Hold score of 30/100, and Exit score of 60/100, with the live verdict AVOID and verdict driver ai_engine=hold. Ranked #530 of 8541 raydium-amm pools, SOL-GOAT is being assessed as a pool to monitor and hold selectively rather than an unqualified entry; the fee-only structure makes the assessment depend on persistent volume and liquidity. A TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, or loss of meaningful swap activity would weaken the assessment, while sustained volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-09-05 10:52 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.48M
Total value locked
$62.48K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up3.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a predefined exit rule: review the position whenever 0.04x falls materially or 3.7% drops below your required return, and exit rather than waiting for an emissions recovery because the current yield is fee-only.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 3.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 3.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $62.48K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $156.19 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 15 SOL-GOAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#5265 of 61707 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 10% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9673 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GOAT liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOAT into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's income can fall if trading slows.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 3.7% and a reward-only APR of 0.1%. 98% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the quoted APR. Reward-schedule and reward-duration data are not established; the practical dependency is therefore on SOL-GOAT trading volume and retained liquidity rather than emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range reading are not available, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GOAT is exposed to rapid changes in attention, price, liquidity, and swap volume; emission decay is not the present source of yield, but exit timing still matters if trading activity contracts. LPs should be prepared for a fee-rate decline and a less liquid exit during a meme-cycle reversal.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than GOAT. For this LP, SOL price moves change the pool's inventory mix relative to GOAT; a sustained SOL move can create impermanent loss even when the position continues collecting fees.
tollGOAT Context
GOAT is the memecoin side of the pair, with liquidity and demand concentrated more heavily in this pool and related venues than SOL. A sharp GOAT repricing or loss of attention can increase inventory imbalance, reduce swap volume, and make fee income less reliable while leaving the LP holding more of the weaker asset.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GOAT into a shared pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but your holdings can become more concentrated in whichever token performs worse, and the pool's income can fall if trading slows.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9Tb2ohu5P16BpBarqd3N27WnkF51Ukfs8Z1GzzLDxVZW
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GOAT (CzLSujWB…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
103%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current APR is 3.7%, split between 3.7% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Because 98% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay is not currently reducing a reward-funded portion; lower trading volume would be the more direct APR risk.
The current APR is 3.7%, split between 3.7% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Because 98% of yield is fee-derived, emission decay is not currently reducing a reward-funded portion; lower trading volume would be the more direct APR risk.
The stated reward APR is 0.1%, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a current reward contribution. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees, with 3.7% changing as volume, liquidity, and fee distribution change.
The stated reward APR is 0.1%, so expiry of farm incentives would not remove a current reward contribution. LP income would continue to depend on trading fees, with 3.7% changing as volume, liquidity, and fee distribution change.
The risk is higher than for a pair of highly liquid established assets because GOAT demand, liquidity, and price can change quickly. Recent impermanent loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the position should be sized for uncertain price divergence and possible difficulty exiting during a volume decline.
The risk is higher than for a pair of highly liquid established assets because GOAT demand, liquidity, and price can change quickly. Recent impermanent loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the position should be sized for uncertain price divergence and possible difficulty exiting during a volume decline.
Use a predefined trigger such as a material decline in 3.7%, a sustained fall in 0.04x, or a TVL drain. For SOL-GOAT, waiting for rewards to return is not a clear exit thesis because the current reward APR is 0.1%.
Use a predefined trigger such as a material decline in 3.7%, a sustained fall in 0.04x, or a TVL drain. For SOL-GOAT, waiting for rewards to return is not a clear exit thesis because the current reward APR is 0.1%.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated from the available data because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income at 3.7% is sufficient to offset the position's eventual inventory divergence and exit costs.
No reliable break-even period can be calculated from the available data because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. The relevant comparison is whether future fee income at 3.7% is sufficient to offset the position's eventual inventory divergence and exit costs.
