new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool below a neutral holding profile: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100, with the live verdict at EXIT. The AI engine reads hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the unopposed signal is a strong exit driver. Its rank of #1710 of 24532 raydium-amm pools indicates that it is not near the strongest part of the listed pool set. The assessment could improve through sustained volume growth, deeper liquidity, reliable fee generation, and evidence that the range remains usable; a TVL drain, further volume decline, or reward collapse would worsen it.
Computed 2026-11-12 11:12 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$62.73K
Total value locked
$257.18
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -5.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the live exit signal, use a small actively monitored range and set an automatic review when price leaves the selected ticks or when daily volume falls further relative to $63K; exit rather than widen the range if the scanner remains CRITICAL and fee generation does not improve.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $257.18 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.64 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 SOL-GM pools
by AI Farmer Score
#12955 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 12% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18787 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-GM liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GM into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and less overall value than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The modeled return decomposes into 0.7% from swap fees and 0.0% from incentives. 100% of yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component supporting the APR. Reward dependency is not established, and fee income will remain sensitive to whether volume increases relative to the pool's liquidity; the current Vol/TVL ratio is 0.00x.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and reported tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be measured from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-GM carries high exposure to sharp repricing, thin exit liquidity, and emission decay if incentives are introduced later. Exit timing matters because a falling token price or shrinking market can reduce fee generation before an LP can rebalance.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established Solana asset in this pair and generally has broader liquidity elsewhere than this pool. SOL price movement changes the relative value of the two deposits; a sustained move in SOL against GM can create impermanent loss even when swap fees accrue.
tollGM Context
GM is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and tradability are likely to dominate the pool's tail risk. This pool alone does not demonstrate GM's liquidity depth elsewhere; compare external market depth and slippage before relying on the position for an exit. A sharp GM move can push the position toward one asset and increase impermanent-loss exposure.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and GM into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and less overall value than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9qkMnNBuvu77CdqFZ9tTmNFniJcDdzzqfDpHu8AmWKXN
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- GM (4aL5GLRu…)
- Created
- 5/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
18%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current modeled return is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not reduce the present reward contribution, but any future incentive program would be temporary and should not be treated as permanent yield.
The current modeled return is 0.7%, consisting of 0.7% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Because the reward component is currently zero, further emission decay would not reduce the present reward contribution, but any future incentive program would be temporary and should not be treated as permanent yield.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently modeled reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.7% in trading fees, which is tied to volume and liquidity rather than emissions.
The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so expiration would not remove a currently modeled reward stream. The remaining return would depend on 0.7% in trading fees, which is tied to volume and liquidity rather than emissions.
Risk is high because GM can reprice sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the position can accumulate the weaker asset during a one-sided move. The pool has $63K, a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, a Wealthville Score of 17/100, and a live verdict of EXIT.
Risk is high because GM can reprice sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and the position can accumulate the weaker asset during a one-sided move. The pool has $63K, a Vol/TVL ratio of 0.00x, a Wealthville Score of 17/100, and a live verdict of EXIT.
For SOL-GM, an exit is warranted when the selected range is no longer usable, volume falls relative to $63K, or the CRITICAL scanner signal remains unopposed. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emission decay or a further TVL drain would add avoidable exposure.
For SOL-GM, an exit is warranted when the selected range is no longer usable, volume falls relative to $63K, or the CRITICAL scanner signal remains unopposed. The current live verdict is EXIT, so waiting for emission decay or a further TVL drain would add avoidable exposure.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At a fee-only APR of 0.7%, fees can offset price divergence only if trading activity persists and the position remains productive.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. At a fee-only APR of 0.7%, fees can offset price divergence only if trading activity persists and the position remains productive.
