RBLX-USDCon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $78.28K
- APR
- 89.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $50.03K 24h vol
- Pool address
- 9uSc8XrF…u5Wd · observed 2026-11-08
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 54/100 gives this pool a live HOLD verdict, with Enter 48/100, Hold 61/100, and Exit 20/100 scores. The ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with a fee-funded pool that has meaningful turnover but limited evidence on range behavior, persistence, or lifecycle. Its rank of #2450 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools places it away from the stronger-ranked portion of the set rather than establishing a protocol-leading opportunity. A sustained TVL drain, lower volume, or collapse in fee APR would weaken the assessment; durable volume with stable or rising TVL and clearer range history could improve it.
Computed 2026-11-08 17:35 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$78.28K
Total value locked
$50.03K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up89.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 95.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range only if you can monitor it, and set an exit trigger when the position moves outside that range or when rolling volume-to-TVL falls materially below 0.64x; otherwise, the position can retain RBLX exposure while earning little or no fee income.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 89.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 64.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $50.03K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $202.37 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 3 RBLX-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#506 of 20718 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3593 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the RBLX-USDC liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing RBLX and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward RBLX or USDC as its price moves, and you can lose money compared with simply holding the two assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated APR decomposes into 64.1% from trading fees and 25.7% from rewards, with 71% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established for this pool, so the fee component is the relevant current income source; if trading volume falls, APR can decline without any change to the token pair.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading and seven-day tick-in-range history are not available, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, RBLX-USDC carries high price-movement and liquidity-regime risk in RBLX, while concentrated liquidity can stop earning fees when price leaves the selected range. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the stated reward APR is zero, but exit timing matters if RBLX volume, market depth, or fee generation deteriorates.
tollRBLX Context
RBLX is the volatile asset in this pair, so providing liquidity requires exposure to its price relative to USDC rather than holding a neutral dollar position. Liquidity depth for RBLX elsewhere is not established by these pool metrics; a sharp RBLX move can create inventory imbalance, price impact, and losses relative to simply holding the tokens.
tollUSDC Context
USDC supplies the stable-value side of the pair and is the reference asset against which RBLX price changes are measured. Its broad use in Solana markets can support routing, but USDC exposure still includes stablecoin, issuer, and depeg risk; when RBLX rises or falls sharply, the LP's token mix changes through the pool's pricing mechanism.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing RBLX and USDC into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward RBLX or USDC as its price moves, and you can lose money compared with simply holding the two assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- 9uSc8XrFbKJBcFpcsNXaWJ4vu6YYDUVf8cQTsJJ8u5Wd
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- RBLX (RBLXDGRD…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
35%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward APR is 25.7%, so the stated 89.8% APR is not presently dependent on emissions. Future emission changes would therefore have limited direct effect unless rewards are introduced; trading volume remains the main driver of the fee APR, 64.1%.
The current reward APR is 25.7%, so the stated 89.8% APR is not presently dependent on emissions. Future emission changes would therefore have limited direct effect unless rewards are introduced; trading volume remains the main driver of the fee APR, 64.1%.
The current figures already show 25.7% reward APR and 71% of yield from trading fees. If any future incentives expire, the remaining return would depend on 64.1% in fees and could fall further if traders reduce activity.
The current figures already show 25.7% reward APR and 71% of yield from trading fees. If any future incentives expire, the remaining return would depend on 64.1% in fees and could fall further if traders reduce activity.
Risk is elevated because RBLX can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and a seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool. The pool has $78K TVL and a 0.64x volume-to-TVL ratio, but turnover does not remove memecoin price, range, or stablecoin risks.
Risk is elevated because RBLX can move sharply, liquidity can thin quickly, and a seven-day impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool. The pool has $78K TVL and a 0.64x volume-to-TVL ratio, but turnover does not remove memecoin price, range, or stablecoin risks.
Consider exiting when RBLX leaves your active range, when volume and fee generation fall materially, or when pool TVL is draining faster than fees compensate for the exposure. For this pool, compare ongoing results with 64.1%, $78K, and 0.64x rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
Consider exiting when RBLX leaves your active range, when volume and fee generation fall materially, or when pool TVL is draining faster than fees compensate for the exposure. For this pool, compare ongoing results with 64.1%, $78K, and 0.64x rather than relying on the headline APR alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees are currently represented by 64.1%, but the time needed to offset price divergence depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether RBLX returns toward the pool entry price.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Fees are currently represented by 64.1%, but the time needed to offset price divergence depends on how long that fee rate persists and whether RBLX returns toward the pool entry price.
