new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 51/100 gives this pool a Hold verdict of HOLD, with Enter at 46/100, Hold at 57/100, and Exit at 24/100. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the model favors retaining exposure over initiating or closing it, consistent with a fee-supported pool that still has memecoin and liquidity risks. Its rank of #88 of 1696 meteora-dlmm pools places it relatively high within the tracked set, but not beyond risk review. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee generation collapses, volume falls, or WEN liquidity deteriorates; it would improve only if fee production remains durable while liquidity and range utilization become more reliable.
Computed 2026-09-06 16:21 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$34.83K
Total value locked
$27.36K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up131.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 10.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with an active range centered on the current WEN-SOL price, and rebalance when price approaches either range boundary; exit if volume or fee generation falls materially below the levels represented by $27K and 83.8%, or if TVL begins draining from $35K.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 131.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 83.8% | — | — |
| Volume | $27.36K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $86.22 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 4 WEN-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#146 of 3058 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1041 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the WEN-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing WEN and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of WEN and SOL you hold can change, and a sharp move in either asset can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 83.8% fee APR and 47.2% reward APR, with 64% of yield sourced from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the fee component should be treated as the relevant current return driver rather than assuming an incentive schedule. The annualized figure depends on trading volume, liquidity, and fee capture continuing at comparable levels.
shieldRisk Assessment
No seven-day impermanent-loss history or tick-in-range reading is supplied, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, WEN-SOL carries high relative-price and liquidity risks: WEN moves can leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset, while a narrow active range can stop earning fees after price displacement. Emission decay is a family-specific concern if incentives are added later, although the current reward component is 47.2%; exit timing should account for falling volume, reduced liquidity, and difficulty closing the position during a rapid WEN move.
tollWEN Context
WEN is the memecoin side of this pair and is likely to contribute most of the idiosyncratic price and liquidity risk. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied pool metrics, so a WEN price move can change the LP's inventory mix quickly and may be harder to hedge or exit than a position in a deeper asset.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the paired asset and the principal relative-price benchmark for valuing WEN in this pool. SOL's broader liquidity depth is not quantified here; a SOL rally or decline changes the WEN-SOL exchange rate, shifts the LP's inventory between the two assets, and can create impermanent loss even when absolute WEN and SOL prices both rise.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing WEN and SOL into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts of WEN and SOL you hold can change, and a sharp move in either asset can leave you with a less valuable mix than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- A6u8tWDtSNuEyZSZufoP9TGQvuEREKnpGcNP7xUsYMKq
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- WEN (WENWENvq…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
2%
APR
19%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current breakdown assigns 47.2% to rewards, so the stated APR is driven by 83.8% in fees rather than an active reward stream. If incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time unless trading fees increased enough to offset it.
The current breakdown assigns 47.2% to rewards, so the stated APR is driven by 83.8% in fees rather than an active reward stream. If incentives are introduced, emission decay would reduce the reward component over time unless trading fees increased enough to offset it.
Because the current reward component is 47.2% and fee sustainability is 64%, an incentive expiry would not directly remove the stated fee yield. The practical effect would be lower total APR if rewards later become part of the pool's return, potentially reducing liquidity and increasing exit slippage.
Because the current reward component is 47.2% and fee sustainability is 64%, an incentive expiry would not directly remove the stated fee yield. The practical effect would be lower total APR if rewards later become part of the pool's return, potentially reducing liquidity and increasing exit slippage.
The risk is material because WEN can move sharply relative to SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while the pool's TVL is $35K. The pool's 0.79x turnover ratio supports fee generation, but it does not eliminate price, range, or liquidity risk.
The risk is material because WEN can move sharply relative to SOL, causing inventory imbalance and impermanent loss while the pool's TVL is $35K. The pool's 0.79x turnover ratio supports fee generation, but it does not eliminate price, range, or liquidity risk.
Consider exiting when WEN approaches the edge of your active range, when fee generation falls materially below 83.8%, or when TVL and volume deteriorate from $35K and $27K. A rapid WEN move can also justify closing before the position becomes concentrated in the weaker asset.
Consider exiting when WEN approaches the edge of your active range, when fee generation falls materially below 83.8%, or when TVL and volume deteriorate from $35K and $27K. A rapid WEN move can also justify closing before the position becomes concentrated in the weaker asset.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported. 83.8% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guarantee; actual recovery depends on future volume, price path, rebalancing, and how long the position remains active.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and range utilization are not reported. 83.8% is an annualized fee estimate, not a guarantee; actual recovery depends on future volume, price path, rebalancing, and how long the position remains active.
