new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 57/100, with Enter 53/100, Hold 62/100, and Exit 20/100; the live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold. Its #103 rank among meteora-dlmm pools places it ahead of many listed pools but does not override the pool-specific uncertainty around range behavior, lifecycle, and reward dependency. The hold assessment is consistent with fee-funded current yield and measurable trading activity, balanced against MEMECOIN price risk and incomplete loss history. A sustained TVL drain, material volume contraction, or collapse in 324.2% would weaken the assessment; persistent fee volume with stable liquidity would support it.
Computed 2026-08-23 18:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$184.45K
Total value locked
$94.19K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 331.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow, actively monitored range only if you can rebalance when the pair price approaches either boundary; exit or reduce the position if price leaves the range and 0.51x activity no longer supports the fee case, or if pool TVL begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 324.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $94.19K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.72K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#5 of 11 ANSEM-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#184 of 2800 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #899 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ANSEM-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with a different mix of ANSEM and SOL and may reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated return decomposes into 324.2% fee-only APR and 175.8% reward-only APR, with 65% of yield sourced from trading fees. Rewards are not currently contributing to the stated APR, but reward dependency is not established, so LPs should not assume fee generation will persist if volume falls. The protocol median for volume-to-TVL is unavailable for this comparison, leaving 0.51x as the relevant pool-level activity measure.
shieldRisk Assessment
The dashboard does not provide a current seven-day impermanent-loss reading or tick-in-range reading, so recent loss experience and range utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, ANSEM-SOL carries sharp relative-price and liquidity risks: emission decay can remove any future incentive support, while a rapid move in ANSEM or SOL can push liquidity out of the active range and make rebalancing or exit timing material. Fee income may offset losses, but 324.2% is an annualized rate rather than a guaranteed recovery period.
tollANSEM Context
ANSEM is the memecoin side of this pair, so its price movement relative to SOL determines how much of the LP position is converted into one asset as the pool rebalances. This pool's figures do not establish ANSEM's liquidity depth elsewhere; thin external liquidity would increase slippage and make an orderly LP exit harder during a selloff. An ANSEM rally can also leave the LP holding proportionally more SOL, while an ANSEM decline can increase ANSEM exposure.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base-asset side of the pair and provides the more established reference asset against which ANSEM's price is measured. This pool's figures do not establish SOL's liquidity depth elsewhere, but SOL volatility still changes the pair price and can move a concentrated position out of range. A broad SOL move can therefore create LP rebalancing needs even when ANSEM-specific trading activity is unchanged.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ANSEM and SOL into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but large price moves can leave you with a different mix of ANSEM and SOL and may reduce the value of your deposit compared with simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AUvX4hEMi9t43aqovA5tEAA5AZ7yugcpHa8SkJVEoEKa
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- ANSEM (9cRCn9rG…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 6/28/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
2%
APR
0%
APR
133%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated return is 500.0%, made up of 324.2% in fees and 175.8% in rewards, so current APR is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced or later decay, that component would fall without directly changing fee income; the pool's reward dependency is not established.
The current stated return is 500.0%, made up of 324.2% in fees and 175.8% in rewards, so current APR is fee-led rather than emission-led. If incentives are introduced or later decay, that component would fall without directly changing fee income; the pool's reward dependency is not established.
Because the current reward-only component is 175.8%, expiry would not remove a currently material reward contribution in the displayed figures. The remaining case would depend on 324.2% from trading fees, which can decline if volume or liquidity falls.
Because the current reward-only component is 175.8%, expiry would not remove a currently material reward contribution in the displayed figures. The remaining case would depend on 324.2% from trading fees, which can decline if volume or liquidity falls.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain exit liquidity, and potentially abrupt ANSEM-SOL price changes. The dashboard does not provide a current seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-in-range reading, so recent loss and range exposure cannot be quantified; fee income is shown as 324.2%.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, uncertain exit liquidity, and potentially abrupt ANSEM-SOL price changes. The dashboard does not provide a current seven-day impermanent-loss or tick-in-range reading, so recent loss and range exposure cannot be quantified; fee income is shown as 324.2%.
For ANSEM-SOL, consider exiting when price leaves your active range, pool TVL drains, or trading activity no longer justifies the position's management burden. A sustained fall in 0.51x or 324.2%, or a change from the current HOLD verdict, would be concrete reassessment signals.
For ANSEM-SOL, consider exiting when price leaves your active range, pool TVL drains, or trading activity no longer justifies the position's management burden. A sustained fall in 0.51x or 324.2%, or a change from the current HOLD verdict, would be concrete reassessment signals.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because the dashboard does not provide a current seven-day impermanent-loss reading or a measured loss history. 324.2% is an annualized fee rate, not a guaranteed recovery rate, and future break-even depends on price path, range placement, volume, and realized fees.
There is no defensible break-even estimate because the dashboard does not provide a current seven-day impermanent-loss reading or a measured loss history. 324.2% is an annualized fee rate, not a guaranteed recovery rate, and future break-even depends on price path, range placement, volume, and realized fees.
