new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 40/100 gives this pool a mixed profile: Enter is 34/100, Hold is 47/100, and Exit is 33/100, with the live verdict at HOLD. The stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold, and the pool ranks #898 of 24532 raydium-amm pools, which places it above many listed pools but does not establish resilience or liquidity quality. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, trading activity fell, or the fee-derived APR collapsed; it would improve only with durable liquidity and volume, clearer range performance, and evidence that fees persist without emissions.
Computed 2026-11-11 03:33 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$41.22K
Total value locked
$9.73K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up22.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -40.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately wide initial tick range and monitor the position at each range boundary; rebalance or exit when price reaches a boundary instead of leaving liquidity inactive outside the range. Also reassess the position if $41K declines materially or if fee generation no longer supports 19.9%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 22.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 19.9% | — | — |
| Volume | $9.73K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $24.31 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SPCXx-OWL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#4752 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 7% of all Solana pools
overall rank #9462 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SPCXx-OWL liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCXX and OWL into the same trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the token that performed worse, and a sharp memecoin price move can outweigh those fees.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed Total APR of 22.1% decomposes into 19.9% from trading fees and 2.1% from rewards. 90% of the reported yield is therefore fee-derived, while reward dependency and any future emission schedule are not established. The fee component depends on continued swap activity rather than a fixed subsidy, so a volume decline would reduce the realized return.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and the recent share of liquidity remaining inside its active tick range is also unavailable. As a MEMECOIN pool, SPCXX-OWL has added exposure to abrupt, one-sided price moves, shallow-liquidity slippage, and correlated exits. Emission decay is less relevant to the current displayed APR because no reward component is represented, but exit timing still matters: a sharp token move or liquidity drain can make re-entry, rebalancing, or withdrawal more costly.
tollSPCXx Context
SPCXX is one side of this liquidity pair, so an LP holds SPCXX exposure while quoting it against OWL rather than simply holding either token. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not established by the supplied data; weak external liquidity would make SPCXX price moves more discontinuous and could increase execution costs. A sustained SPCXX rally or fall relative to OWL can shift the LP toward the weaker-performing asset and create impermanent loss.
tollOWL Context
OWL is the other side of the pair and supplies the reference asset against which SPCXX trades in this pool. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied data, so external market depth should be checked before treating pool volume as readily withdrawable liquidity. OWL price action relative to SPCXX determines which token accumulates in the LP position and whether fee income offsets that divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SPCXX and OWL into the same trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but you can end up holding more of the token that performed worse, and a sharp memecoin price move can outweigh those fees.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AVaw6h3zE2eU57zDTMqPwdmxJnrFbuBcKoJ3FsdKdL49
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SPCXx (Xs3oZwbH…)
- Token B
- OWL (68AGsjom…)
- Created
- 10/5/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current display assigns 2.1% to rewards and 19.9% to fees, so the stated APR of 22.1% is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, that reward portion would fall, while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
The current display assigns 2.1% to rewards and 19.9% to fees, so the stated APR of 22.1% is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, that reward portion would fall, while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
There is no represented reward component in the current breakdown, so expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee component, 19.9%, supported by trading activity and summarized by 90%.
There is no represented reward component in the current breakdown, so expiration would not remove a currently displayed reward stream. The remaining return would be the fee component, 19.9%, supported by trading activity and summarized by 90%.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because SPCXX and OWL can move sharply and liquidity can leave quickly. Recent IL and active-range readings are unavailable, so the fee rate of 19.9% should not be treated as proof that price risk is covered.
Risk is high relative to a deeper, less volatile pair because SPCXX and OWL can move sharply and liquidity can leave quickly. Recent IL and active-range readings are unavailable, so the fee rate of 19.9% should not be treated as proof that price risk is covered.
Consider exiting when price reaches the chosen range boundary, when pool liquidity drains, or when fee income no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. For this pool, a sustained deterioration in $41K or 0.24x is a concrete warning signal.
Consider exiting when price reaches the chosen range boundary, when pool liquidity drains, or when fee income no longer compensates for the position's price exposure. For this pool, a sustained deterioration in $41K or 0.24x is a concrete warning signal.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be made because recent IL history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Ignoring compounding and further price divergence, a loss of x% would require roughly x divided by 19.9% years of fee income, but that calculation assumes the fee rate persists.
A reliable break-even estimate cannot be made because recent IL history is unavailable and future volume is uncertain. Ignoring compounding and further price divergence, a loss of x% would require roughly x divided by 19.9% years of fee income, but that calculation assumes the fee rate persists.
