SOL-STONKon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $67.94K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $305.94K 24h vol
- Pool address
- AfrddTGY…dEhg · observed 2026-08-23
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 52/100 produces Enter 47/100, Hold 57/100, and Exit 25/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the available balance between fee generation and pool risk supports maintaining exposure more than initiating or immediately closing it; the pool ranks #1203 of 2506 orca-whirlpool pools, placing it near the middle of the evaluated set rather than among the strongest alternatives. The assessment would change if TVL drained, volume fell enough to collapse 500.0%, the price stayed outside LP ranges, or new emissions temporarily altered the return profile.
Computed 2026-08-23 16:06 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$67.94K
Total value locked
$305.94K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 350.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a monitored concentrated range around the current SOL/STONK price and rebalance when the price leaves that range or when fee volume no longer justifies the position; exit if pool TVL drains materially while volume and fee APR fall together.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $305.94K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.98K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-STONK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#89 of 13395 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #994 of 95923
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-STONK liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STONK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if SOL and STONK move sharply apart, and a memecoin pool may become harder to exit when trading interest fades.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The current yield decomposes into 500.0% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, with 100% of yield from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, but no reward APR is currently contributing to returns, so emission decay is not the present source of APR compression. No time-bound reward schedule can be established from the available data; future returns instead depend on sustained SOL-STONK trading volume and fee capture.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and the seven-day tick-in-range reading are not reported, so recent price divergence and range utilization cannot be quantified from this sheet. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-STONK carries elevated token-price, liquidity, and exit-timing risk; emission decay is not currently reducing APR because rewards contribute nothing, but fee yield can fall quickly if attention and volume leave the pair. Concentrated liquidity can also become inactive when price moves outside the selected range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the base asset in this pool and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than STONK, which can support execution when the pair is actively traded. For this LP, a SOL move relative to STONK changes the price ratio, can push a concentrated position out of range, and can create impermanent loss even when fee income is high.
tollSTONK Context
STONK is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and liquidity are more dependent on token-specific demand than SOL's. Its liquidity depth outside this pool is not quantified here; thinner external liquidity would make sharp repricing, wider execution costs, and difficult exits more consequential for the LP.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and STONK into a shared pool so traders can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the value of your deposit can fall if SOL and STONK move sharply apart, and a memecoin pool may become harder to exit when trading interest fades.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- AfrddTGYwCVEQB1gxCAhR8i48o6qtxYqksdVkeLudEhg
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- STONK (6GmAFSYs…)
- Created
- 8/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
500%
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay is not currently the main APR risk because reward yield is 0.0% and the current total APR of 500.0% is supplied by 500.0% in fees. If future rewards are introduced, their decay would reduce APR unless trading fees replace them.
Emission decay is not currently the main APR risk because reward yield is 0.0% and the current total APR of 500.0% is supplied by 500.0% in fees. If future rewards are introduced, their decay would reduce APR unless trading fees replace them.
The current pool has no reward APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward component. Returns would remain dependent on 500.0%, trading activity, and the resulting 100% fee share.
The current pool has no reward APR, so an incentive expiry would not remove a current reward component. Returns would remain dependent on 500.0%, trading activity, and the resulting 100% fee share.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because STONK can reprice sharply and its outside liquidity is not quantified here. The pool's $68K liquidity and $306K daily volume can support fee generation, but they do not prevent impermanent loss or an increasingly difficult exit.
Risk is high relative to a SOL pair with a more established second asset because STONK can reprice sharply and its outside liquidity is not quantified here. The pool's $68K liquidity and $306K daily volume can support fee generation, but they do not prevent impermanent loss or an increasingly difficult exit.
For SOL-STONK, consider exiting when price leaves your range and cannot be restored by a rebalance, or when TVL drains while volume and 500.0% decline. A sustained loss of trading activity is more important here than waiting for a reward-expiry date because current reward APR is 0.0%.
For SOL-STONK, consider exiting when price leaves your range and cannot be restored by a rebalance, or when TVL drains while volume and 500.0% decline. A sustained loss of trading activity is more important here than waiting for a reward-expiry date because current reward APR is 0.0%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. At the current fee structure, recovery depends on accumulating 500.0% while SOL and STONK avoid a sufficiently large or persistent price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is not reported and future fee volume is uncertain. At the current fee structure, recovery depends on accumulating 500.0% while SOL and STONK avoid a sufficiently large or persistent price divergence.
