SOL-USOon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $53.78K
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $138.22K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- Am6L7qY9…hMwb · observed 2026-11-10
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 58/100 assigns Enter 53/100, Hold 64/100, and Exit 18/100, producing a live verdict of HOLD from the ai_engine=hold driver. Its rank of #1278 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish that fee income will persist, particularly with modest liquidity and memecoin exposure. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, or the fee APR collapses; it could improve if liquidity deepens and sustained trading raises fee income without a corresponding increase in range or counterparty risk.
Computed 2026-11-10 10:11 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$53.78K
Total value locked
$138.22K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 332.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a relatively narrow active range only if it can be monitored frequently, and set a rebalance or exit trigger when the pool's realized volume-to-liquidity ratio falls materially below 2.57x or price leaves the chosen range.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $138.22K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.39K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 3 SOL-USO pools
by AI Farmer Score
#114 of 20367 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 1% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1156 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-USO liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USO into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of the swap fees. You can end up holding more of the asset that fell in price, and the value of your position can be lower than simply holding both assets, especially when USO moves sharply.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated total APR decomposes into a fee-only APR of 500.0% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. Fee sustainability is 100%, so current yield depends on trading activity rather than a reward schedule. Reward dependency and the reward timetable are not established in the supplied data; any future emission decay would therefore need to be monitored separately from fee generation.
shieldRisk Assessment
No seven-day impermanent-loss history or tick-in-range reading is available for this pool, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-USO can experience abrupt changes in price, volume, and usable liquidity; emission decay is not currently the main stated yield risk, but any future incentives could decline quickly. Exit timing matters because a fall in trading activity can reduce fee income before an LP can exit without materially affecting the position.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and has deeper liquidity across Solana markets than USO. For this LP, a sharp SOL move against USO can create inventory imbalance and impermanent loss even when swap fees remain available. SOL's broader market liquidity may make its side of the position easier to hedge or liquidate than the USO side.
tollUSO Context
USO is the pool's memecoin-side asset, so its liquidity depth outside this pool and its price discovery are more important risks than the fee APR alone indicates. A rapid USO repricing can move the position toward one-sided inventory and increase the cost of exiting or rebalancing. Thin external liquidity can also amplify slippage when the LP needs to remove capital.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and USO into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of the swap fees. You can end up holding more of the asset that fell in price, and the value of your position can be lower than simply holding both assets, especially when USO moves sharply.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Am6L7qY9xr5yaRyozcbonCMTCVmCwekXPHaKK54ThMwb
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- USO (USNv3NkK…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current stated yield is split between 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% from trading fees. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied data, any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component rather than the current fee-derived component.
The current stated yield is split between 500.0% in fees and 0.0% in rewards, with 100% from trading fees. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied data, any future emission decay would mainly affect the reward component rather than the current fee-derived component.
The reward-only component would decline or disappear, while fee income would continue only if trading volume persists. For SOL-USO, the relevant remaining yield would be 500.0%, supported by 100% fee sustainability rather than incentives.
The reward-only component would decline or disappear, while fee income would continue only if trading volume persists. For SOL-USO, the relevant remaining yield would be 500.0%, supported by 100% fee sustainability rather than incentives.
The risk combines SOL price movement, USO price volatility, uncertain external USO liquidity, and the possibility that trading activity falls. The pool's 2.57x ratio and $54K liquidity base should be monitored because lower activity can reduce fees and make exits more costly.
The risk combines SOL price movement, USO price volatility, uncertain external USO liquidity, and the possibility that trading activity falls. The pool's 2.57x ratio and $54K liquidity base should be monitored because lower activity can reduce fees and make exits more costly.
Consider exiting when volume-to-liquidity activity falls materially below 2.57x, when fee income drops materially below 500.0%, or when USO liquidity deteriorates. A price move outside the active range is also a practical trigger to reassess rather than leave capital passively exposed.
Consider exiting when volume-to-liquidity activity falls materially below 2.57x, when fee income drops materially below 500.0%, or when USO liquidity deteriorates. A price move outside the active range is also a practical trigger to reassess rather than leave capital passively exposed.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-performance history. Any estimate would need to compare realized fee income of 500.0% with the position's actual price divergence and withdrawal costs.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the supplied data does not provide recent impermanent-loss or range-performance history. Any estimate would need to compare realized fee income of 500.0% with the position's actual price divergence and withdrawal costs.
