NVDAx-ROUTERon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $13.98K
- APR
- 311.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $7.04K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- Aq4jqjq4…tqM4 · observed 2026-11-07
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 produces an Enter score of 15/100, Hold score of 20/100, and Exit score of 80/100, with the live verdict at EXIT and the stated driver ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1667 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not remove the pool-specific concerns created by $14K, low recent turnover at 0.50x, and dependence on fees rather than rewards. The assessment would change if TVL drained, trading volume weakened enough to collapse 141.7%, or sustained activity and deeper liquidity materially improved fee reliability.
Computed 2026-11-07 15:44 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$13.98K
Total value locked
$7.04K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up311.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -11.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately monitored price range, set alerts at both range boundaries, and rebalance or exit if price remains outside the range long enough that the position is no longer collecting fees; also reassess immediately if volume falls enough for fee generation to weaken from 141.7%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 311.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 141.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $7.04K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $70.39 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 NVDAx-ROUTER pools
by AI Farmer Score
#918 of 20204 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 5% of all Solana pools
overall rank #7038 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the NVDAx-ROUTER liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing NVDAX and ROUTER into a trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive trading fees, currently represented by 141.7%, but price changes can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other, and the position may stop earning fees if price moves outside its range.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 141.7% fee APR and 169.6% reward APR, with 46%. Reward dependency and the remaining reward horizon are not established, so emission decay cannot be modeled as a reliable future yield source. For this MEMECOIN pool, exit timing should therefore be based primarily on whether trading volume continues to support fee generation rather than on an assumed incentive schedule.
shieldRisk Assessment
The seven-day impermanent-loss reading and recent tick-in-range history are unavailable, so realized divergence loss and range utilization cannot be verified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, NVDAX-ROUTER is exposed to sharp, asymmetric price moves that can produce inventory imbalance and force a concentrated-liquidity position out of range. Emission decay is also a family-specific risk: if incentives appear later, their exit timing may be uncertain, while the current fee-led structure already makes a volume decline material.
tollNVDAx Context
NVDAX is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair, so its price movement determines how the position's inventory shifts between NVDAX and ROUTER. Liquidity depth for NVDAX outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics, which limits conclusions about how efficiently LP inventory could be sold elsewhere. A sharp NVDAX move can leave the LP predominantly holding the weaker-performing side after arbitrage.
tollROUTER Context
ROUTER is the other side of the pair and has the same direct effect on the LP's inventory composition as its price changes against NVDAX. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics, so external exit capacity should be checked separately. Strong ROUTER price movement can move the position out of its active range and increase divergence loss even when the pool continues to record fees.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing NVDAX and ROUTER into a trading pool so swaps can use your funds. You receive trading fees, currently represented by 141.7%, but price changes can leave you holding more of one token and less of the other, and the position may stop earning fees if price moves outside its range.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- Aq4jqjq4gQuxFoB4cVMZZLVPhBE8Q1yum7y9YKestqM4
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- NVDAx (Xsc9qvGR…)
- Token B
- ROUTER (6SjVTj1V…)
- Created
- 9/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only component is 169.6%, while the fee component is 141.7% and fee sustainability is 46%. Emission decay would matter mainly if rewards are introduced or become a meaningful part of the return; no dependable reward horizon is established for this pool.
The current reward-only component is 169.6%, while the fee component is 141.7% and fee sustainability is 46%. Emission decay would matter mainly if rewards are introduced or become a meaningful part of the return; no dependable reward horizon is established for this pool.
The pool would rely more explicitly on trading fees, which are currently 141.7%, rather than rewards at 169.6%. If volume does not support those fees, the total return can fall from 311.3%, making exit timing important for this MEMECOIN position.
The pool would rely more explicitly on trading fees, which are currently 141.7%, rather than rewards at 169.6%. If volume does not support those fees, the total return can fall from 311.3%, making exit timing important for this MEMECOIN position.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, limited liquidity at $14K, and the possibility of abrupt NVDAX or ROUTER price moves. The recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the historical frequency of those risks cannot be quantified here.
Risk is elevated by the MEMECOIN classification, limited liquidity at $14K, and the possibility of abrupt NVDAX or ROUTER price moves. The recent impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so the historical frequency of those risks cannot be quantified here.
Review the position when price leaves its chosen range, when pool liquidity falls materially from $14K, or when trading activity no longer supports 141.7%. For this pool, an exit is also more defensible if fee generation weakens because the return is not supported by a known reward schedule.
Review the position when price leaves its chosen range, when pool liquidity falls materially from $14K, or when trading activity no longer supports 141.7%. For this pool, an exit is also more defensible if fee generation weakens because the return is not supported by a known reward schedule.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, and 141.7% can change with volume. Fees may offset divergence loss over time, but a sharp NVDAX-versus-ROUTER move can make the position unprofitable despite 311.3%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because the seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are unavailable, and 141.7% can change with volume. Fees may offset divergence loss over time, but a sharp NVDAX-versus-ROUTER move can make the position unprofitable despite 311.3%.
