new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 combines Enter 15/100, Hold 20/100, and Exit 80/100, producing the live verdict EXIT. With ai_engine=hold, the assessment is to retain exposure only while fee generation and liquidity remain intact, rather than treating the APR as a reason to add risk; the pool ranks #1313 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. A material TVL drain, collapse in fee APR, sustained volume loss, or severe BOT/GROK repricing would change the assessment toward exit, while durable volume and stable liquidity would support the hold view.
Computed 2026-11-06 00:31 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$8.03K
Total value locked
$37.47
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.1%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a defined BOT/GROK price band only if you can rebalance when the pair leaves that band; otherwise use a broader range and exit when fee income no longer compensates for the position's memecoin price risk or when pool liquidity begins to drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $37.47 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.09 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 BOT-GROK pools
by AI Farmer Score
#15199 of 97331 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 15% of all Solana pools
overall rank #21866 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the BOT-GROK liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOT and GROK into a shared trading pool and accepting that the pool may return a different mix of the two tokens later. You earn trading fees, but a large price move in either memecoin can leave you with less value than simply holding the tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 0.5% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards, with 100% of yield sourced from fees. Because reward dependency and the incentive lifecycle are not established, there is no reliable basis for assuming additional emissions or projecting a reward-decay schedule. The fee return therefore depends on sustained volume rather than farm subsidies.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also unavailable, so short-term range efficiency cannot be assessed from these metrics. BOT-GROK belongs to the MEMECOIN family, where sharp token repricing can create impermanent loss, reduce fee generation, or leave an LP holding an unfavorable inventory mix. Emission decay is not currently the primary risk because rewards contribute no reported yield, but exit timing remains important if trading activity or token liquidity deteriorates.
tollBOT Context
BOT is one side of the pool and its price movement changes the inventory mix received by the LP as arbitrageurs rebalance the position. BOT liquidity depth outside this pool is not provided here, so it should be checked separately; a thin external market can make the pool's fee volume less durable and increase execution risk during a selloff.
tollGROK Context
GROK is the other side of the pair, so GROK price action has the same direct effect on the LP's token balances and impermanent-loss exposure. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not provided, and weak external depth would make abrupt repricing more consequential for both arbitrage and exit execution.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BOT and GROK into a shared trading pool and accepting that the pool may return a different mix of the two tokens later. You earn trading fees, but a large price move in either memecoin can leave you with less value than simply holding the tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- At3P9qp8d8LnrJAqm9eGizH5jc1uYpG5m3jMyyeKxrWy
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- BOT (BoTx8y9y…)
- Token B
- GROK (GKeUT73K…)
- Created
- 9/14/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
8%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The reported total APR is 0.5%, consisting of 0.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Since rewards currently contribute no reported yield and the emission schedule is unknown, future APR is more exposed to changes in trading volume and fee generation than to documented farm decay.
The reported total APR is 0.5%, consisting of 0.5% in fees and 0.0% in rewards. Since rewards currently contribute no reported yield and the emission schedule is unknown, future APR is more exposed to changes in trading volume and fee generation than to documented farm decay.
There is no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, while 100% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the direct effect should be limited unless they materially change liquidity or trading volume; the remaining return would depend on 0.5%.
There is no reported reward contribution beyond 0.0%, while 100% of yield comes from fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the direct effect should be limited unless they materially change liquidity or trading volume; the remaining return would depend on 0.5%.
Risk is elevated because BOT and GROK can reprice abruptly, creating impermanent loss and reducing the liquidity value of the position. The pool's $8K TVL and 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio provide context, but they do not remove memecoin liquidity, volatility, or exit risk.
Risk is elevated because BOT and GROK can reprice abruptly, creating impermanent loss and reducing the liquidity value of the position. The pool's $8K TVL and 0.00x volume-to-TVL ratio provide context, but they do not remove memecoin liquidity, volatility, or exit risk.
For BOT-GROK, consider exiting when fee income no longer meets your required return, when pool liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, or when the BOT/GROK price leaves your manageable range. A planned exit is preferable to waiting for a sharp repricing to make execution difficult.
For BOT-GROK, consider exiting when fee income no longer meets your required return, when pool liquidity or trading volume deteriorates, or when the BOT/GROK price leaves your manageable range. A planned exit is preferable to waiting for a sharp repricing to make execution difficult.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range data are unavailable. Break-even depends on future 0.5% collection, the persistence of 0.00x trading activity, and whether BOT and GROK prices reconverge enough to offset the position's divergence.
It cannot be calculated reliably because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-range data are unavailable. Break-even depends on future 0.5% collection, the persistence of 0.00x trading activity, and whether BOT and GROK prices reconverge enough to offset the position's divergence.
