WealthVille
ENA
E
USDC
U

ENA-USDCon Meteora DLMMActive

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $23.41K
APR
18.6% APR
24h Volume
$5.18K 24h vol
Pool address
AtQ6AYNn…4x3S · observed 2026-11-12
41D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 60% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter35

new capital

Hold48

keep position

Exit32

urgency to leave

A Wealthville Score of 41/100 with Enter 35/100, Hold 48/100, and Exit 32/100 translates to a live HOLD assessment rather than an unqualified entry signal. The ai engine signals enter, but promotion is pending the required dwell period; the pool is nevertheless ranked #17 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee APR collapses, or the pool repeatedly loses its active price range; it would strengthen if fee generation persists without a comparable liquidity decline.

Computed 2026-11-12 14:46 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$23.41K

Total value locked

$5.18K

24h volume

×0.2 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

18.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -7.6%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 33m agoTVL ↓8.2%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 92% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 84/100
tips_and_updates

Use a range centered on the current ENA-USDC price only if you can monitor it, and set a rebalance or exit trigger at either range boundary; if price leaves the range or fee volume falls materially, stop treating the position as fee-producing until it is repositioned.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR18.6%——
Fee APR17.0%——
Volume$5.18K——
Fees Earned$11.85——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
18.5%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−26.1%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-7.6%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.22x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0005
Fee APR Sustainability
92% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#3 of 6 ENA-USDC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#1013 of 4637 on meteora-dlmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 5% of all Solana pools

overall rank #6756 of 157883

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ENA-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing ENA and USDC into a pool that automatically trades between them as the price moves. You earn fees when swaps use the pool, but large ENA price moves can leave you holding a different mix of ENA and USDC and can reduce the value relative to simply holding the tokens.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The displayed yield decomposes into 17.0% fee APR and 1.5% reward APR, so 92% of stated yield comes from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established by the available pool data; with no current reward contribution shown, the APR primarily depends on continued volume and fees rather than emissions.

shieldRisk Assessment

Seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-in-range readings are unavailable in this snapshot, so recent loss history and range utilization cannot be quantified here. As a MEMECOIN-family pool, ENA-USDC is exposed to sharp price moves, rapid changes in trading activity, and concentrated-liquidity inventory shifts; emission decay or incentive changes can also reduce the reason to remain in the position, making exit timing important.

tollENA Context

ENA is the volatile side of this pair, so an ENA rally generally leaves an LP with less ENA and more USDC than passive holding, while an ENA decline can increase ENA inventory. Liquidity depth for ENA elsewhere is not established by this pool snapshot; thinner external liquidity would increase slippage and make range exits more consequential.

tollUSDC Context

USDC is the quote and relatively stable side of the pair, providing the accounting unit for fees and the asset accumulated when ENA rises through the range. Its broader liquidity depth is not established here, and any USDC depeg would add a separate stablecoin risk to the LP position.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing ENA and USDC into a pool that automatically trades between them as the price moves. You earn fees when swaps use the pool, but large ENA price moves can leave you holding a different mix of ENA and USDC and can reduce the value relative to simply holding the tokens.

token

Token Details

ENA
ENAEthenaSolana
Explorer

Ethena (ENA) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USDC
USDCUSD CoinSolana

USDC is a fully collateralized US dollar stablecoin. USDC is the bridge between dollars and trading on exchanges.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
AtQ6AYNnpyngry46nwfK2Ffbd1xtNd4vAT3XkZio4x3S
Protocol
Meteora DLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
ENA (72QvBVwp…)
Token B
USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
Created
7/14/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current APR is split between 17.0% in fees and 1.5% in rewards, so the displayed return is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If emissions are introduced or later decay, the reward component would fall, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

The current APR is split between 17.0% in fees and 1.5% in rewards, so the displayed return is currently fee-led rather than emission-led. If emissions are introduced or later decay, the reward component would fall, while fee APR would still depend on trading volume.

Because 1.5% is the current reward-only APR, incentive expiry would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution, but future emissions could still change the pool's economics. The remaining return would depend on 17.0% from trading fees and whether volume supports it.

Because 1.5% is the current reward-only APR, incentive expiry would not remove a currently displayed reward contribution, but future emissions could still change the pool's economics. The remaining return would depend on 17.0% from trading fees and whether volume supports it.

Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because ENA price moves can change the LP's inventory quickly and push the position out of its active range. The pool's stated 18.6% is fee-driven, but it does not offset the possibility of adverse price movement, liquidity withdrawal, or declining volume.

Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because ENA price moves can change the LP's inventory quickly and push the position out of its active range. The pool's stated 18.6% is fee-driven, but it does not offset the possibility of adverse price movement, liquidity withdrawal, or declining volume.

Consider exiting or repositioning when ENA leaves the active range, when fee volume no longer compensates for inventory risk, or when pool liquidity begins draining. For this pool, a sustained decline from 0.22x turnover or a collapse in 17.0% would be a concrete reassessment trigger.

Consider exiting or repositioning when ENA leaves the active range, when fee volume no longer compensates for inventory risk, or when pool liquidity begins draining. For this pool, a sustained decline from 0.22x turnover or a collapse in 17.0% would be a concrete reassessment trigger.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 17.0% continue to exceed the position's loss relative to holding ENA and USDC separately.

A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee volume is uncertain. The relevant comparison is whether accumulated fees at 17.0% continue to exceed the position's loss relative to holding ENA and USDC separately.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights