SOL-QQQxon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $116.45K
- APR
- 116.9% APR
- 24h Volume
- $126.52K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- B6FEtQdw…DSHH · observed 2026-09-06
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 44/100, with Enter at 39/100, Hold at 50/100, and Exit at 31/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #774 among 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it above many listed pools but does not establish safety or persistence. The Hold assessment is consistent with fee-based income and measurable turnover, balanced against memecoin and range risks that cannot be fully measured from the unavailable recent IL and tick-history data. A TVL drain, sustained volume contraction, collapse in 77.5%, or a major QQQX liquidity deterioration would weaken the assessment; durable fee growth and better observed range persistence would improve it.
Computed 2026-09-06 15:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$116.45K
Total value locked
$126.52K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up116.9%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter with a range that you can monitor and rebalance when the position reaches either tick boundary; exit rather than widening the range if swap activity falls materially while QQQX volatility rises, because wider exposure can convert fee collection into concentrated memecoin inventory.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 116.9% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 77.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $126.52K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $316.31 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-QQQx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#379 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2562 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-QQQx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QQQX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and a lower value than simply holding both assets.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into a fee-only APR of 77.5% and a reward-only APR of 39.4%. Fee sustainability is 66%, so the current APR does not rely on active farm rewards; reward dependency remains unconfirmed, and there is no current reward stream whose remaining duration can be stated. If incentives are added later, their decay would reduce total APR unless trading fees replace them.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range history is also not reported, so neither realized divergence loss nor range efficiency can be quantified from the supplied data. This is a MEMECOIN pool: QQQX price shocks, thin liquidity, and rapid attention decay can move the position out of range or leave the LP holding more of the depreciating asset. Emission decay and exit timing matter even though current rewards are zero; an LP should not assume future incentives will compensate for adverse price movement.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the liquid, established side of this pair and has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than a typical memecoin. SOL price movement relative to QQQX changes the pool's inventory mix; a sustained SOL rally or decline can create impermanent loss even when fee income remains positive.
tollQQQx Context
QQQX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity depth outside this pool should be checked before sizing a position or assuming an orderly exit. Sharp QQQX price moves can push a concentrated position out of range and leave the LP disproportionately exposed to QQQX after arbitrage.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and QQQX into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive part of the trading fees, but price changes can leave you with more of the weaker-performing token and a lower value than simply holding both assets.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- B6FEtQdwsq8Wuw4G52pW9WEWEA7ALGfyUgXDRKigDSHH
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- QQQx (Xs8S1uUs…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward APR is 39.4%, while fee APR is 77.5% and fee sustainability is 66%. Because the present yield is fee-derived, future emission decay would matter only if rewards are introduced; otherwise APR changes mainly with trading volume, liquidity, and fee rates.
Current reward APR is 39.4%, while fee APR is 77.5% and fee sustainability is 66%. Because the present yield is fee-derived, future emission decay would matter only if rewards are introduced; otherwise APR changes mainly with trading volume, liquidity, and fee rates.
There is no current reward APR shown, so expiration of a future incentive would not remove the existing fee-only component of 116.9%. After incentives end, the position would depend on 77.5% and could become less useful if trading activity does not support the fee rate.
There is no current reward APR shown, so expiration of a future incentive would not remove the existing fee-only component of 116.9%. After incentives end, the position would depend on 77.5% and could become less useful if trading activity does not support the fee rate.
The main risks are QQQX price collapse, rapid divergence between SOL and QQQX, and a position moving outside its active ticks. $116K of liquidity and 1.09x volume/TVL indicate that fees are tied to continued activity in a relatively small MEMECOIN pool, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is not available.
The main risks are QQQX price collapse, rapid divergence between SOL and QQQX, and a position moving outside its active ticks. $116K of liquidity and 1.09x volume/TVL indicate that fees are tied to continued activity in a relatively small MEMECOIN pool, while recent impermanent-loss and tick-range history is not available.
For SOL-QQQX, an exit signal is a combination of falling fee income, shrinking TVL, worsening QQQX liquidity, or a move that leaves the position outside its chosen ticks. Do not wait for incentives to justify staying when the pool's fee flow no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk.
For SOL-QQQX, an exit signal is a combination of falling fee income, shrinking TVL, worsening QQQX liquidity, or a move that leaves the position outside its chosen ticks. Do not wait for incentives to justify staying when the pool's fee flow no longer compensates for inventory and execution risk.
No reliable fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee flow is variable. Compare realized fees, represented by 77.5%, with the mark-to-market loss from holding the same SOL and QQQX separately; 116.9% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
No reliable fixed break-even period can be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and future fee flow is variable. Compare realized fees, represented by 77.5%, with the mark-to-market loss from holding the same SOL and QQQX separately; 116.9% should not be treated as a guaranteed recovery period.
