GOOGLx-USDCon Raydium CLMMCLMMActive
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $229.94K
- APR
- 49.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $105.09K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- B8YAwjGY…obRw · observed 2026-09-07
Wealthville Score
Verdict HOLD · 53% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 57/100 sits below the Enter threshold of 52/100 and the Hold threshold of 63/100, while the Exit threshold is 18/100. The live verdict is HOLD because the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, even though the AI engine is marked hold. Its rank of #1202 of 4410 raydium-clmm pools places it well away from the stronger end of the set. The assessment would improve only with sustained trading-volume growth, healthier liquidity retention, and evidence that fee income remains dependable; a TVL drain, further yield collapse, or worsening scanner signals would reinforce the exit case.
Computed 2026-09-07 10:54 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$229.94K
Total value locked
$105.09K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up49.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 20.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
If entering despite the live EXIT signal, use a small position with a narrow range and set an automatic review or exit when the scanner's CRITICAL status is no longer offset by materially higher volume, or when volume falls below $105K while TVL remains near $230K.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 49.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 40.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $105.09K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $262.72 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 14 GOOGLx-USDC pools
by AI Farmer Score
#320 of 14926 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2004 of 107256
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the GOOGLx-USDC liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing GOOGLX and USDC into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. Price changes can leave you holding more of one token than the other, and the pool's current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield decomposes into 40.2% from trading fees and 9.3% from rewards, with 81% of total yield fee-funded. The supplied metrics do not establish a reward schedule or its remaining duration, so emission-based income should not be assumed. Any future reward emissions would be additive to fee income but subject to decay and possible termination.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and the share of time liquidity stayed in range are not reported, leaving recent position efficiency unquantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, GOOGLX-USDC carries sharp price-move and liquidity-contraction risk, while emission decay can remove any incentive support and reduce the value of waiting. Exit timing matters because a decline in attention or market depth can make fees insufficient relative to inventory divergence.
tollGOOGLx Context
GOOGLX is the volatile asset in this pair, while USDC provides the quoted settlement value. Liquidity depth for GOOGLX outside this pool is not established by the supplied metrics; a sharp GOOGLX move can therefore shift the LP toward one-sided inventory and increase divergence from simply holding the tokens.
tollUSDC Context
USDC is the dollar-denominated side of the pair and normally serves as the LP's stable reference asset. Its broader liquidity is not measured here, but GOOGLX selling pressure can leave the position concentrated in USDC while GOOGLX appreciation can leave it concentrated in GOOGLX.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing GOOGLX and USDC into a shared trading pool and earning a portion of swap fees. Price changes can leave you holding more of one token than the other, and the pool's current return comes from fees rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- B8YAwjGYk6qidWzGBXMAxP7nYfG8g74EZ3Y4gFSsobRw
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- GOOGLx (XsCPL9dN…)
- Token B
- USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current rewards contribute 9.3%, while fee income contributes 40.2% and accounts for 81% of yield. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall without directly changing the fee rate.
Current rewards contribute 9.3%, while fee income contributes 40.2% and accounts for 81% of yield. If emissions are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall without directly changing the fee rate.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 40.2%, rather than rewards represented by 9.3%. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied metrics, the post-incentive yield cannot be projected beyond its fee component.
The pool would rely on trading fees, currently represented by 40.2%, rather than rewards represented by 9.3%. Because the reward schedule is not established in the supplied metrics, the post-incentive yield cannot be projected beyond its fee component.
Risk is elevated because GOOGLX can move sharply and liquidity can contract as attention fades. Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent loss exposure and range efficiency cannot be quantified; current turnover is only 0.46x relative to liquidity.
Risk is elevated because GOOGLX can move sharply and liquidity can contract as attention fades. Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent loss exposure and range efficiency cannot be quantified; current turnover is only 0.46x relative to liquidity.
For this pool, the live signal is HOLD, with a CRITICAL scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should reassess immediately if volume weakens from $105K, TVL falls from $230K, or emissions decay without enough fee generation to compensate.
For this pool, the live signal is HOLD, with a CRITICAL scanner result and an unopposed strong EXIT signal. An LP should reassess immediately if volume weakens from $105K, TVL falls from $230K, or emissions decay without enough fee generation to compensate.
There is no reliable time estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading activity. At 40.2% fee APR, recovery depends on future fees exceeding the position's token divergence and withdrawal costs.
There is no reliable time estimate because seven-day impermanent-loss history is not reported and fee income varies with trading activity. At 40.2% fee APR, recovery depends on future fees exceeding the position's token divergence and withdrawal costs.
