XBG-BORGon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $630.75K
- APR
- 4.1% APR
- 24h Volume
- $17.01K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- BH8xeJZ9…62Zr · observed 2026-11-03
Wealthville Score
Verdict AVOID · 61% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
A Wealthville Score of 19/100 places this pool below its Enter threshold of 10/100 and Hold threshold of 30/100, while its Exit threshold is 60/100 and the live verdict is AVOID. The ranking of #1884 of 9963 raydium-clmm pools is consistent with a weak relative position: the scanner is CRITICAL, the AI engine reads hold, and the recent TVL contraction appears to have partially reversed rather than established durable growth, so the bleed cap was skipped. The assessment would improve with sustained TVL stabilization, stronger volume relative to liquidity, and fee yield that remains intact without incentives; it would worsen with another liquidity drain or a collapse in fee generation.
Computed 2026-11-03 21:15 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$630.75K
Total value locked
$17.01K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up4.1%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 1.9%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Enter only with a range that can be monitored actively, and exit if pool liquidity resumes a sustained decline or if trading flow no longer supports the fee return; do not leave the position unattended through a sharp XBG or BORG move.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 4.1% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 4.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $17.01K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $42.54 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 2 XBG-BORG pools
by AI Farmer Score
#1512 of 19999 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18656 of 153992
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the XBG-BORG liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing XBG and BORG into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing coin, and the reported return depends on trading activity rather than rewards.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 4.0% from trading fees and 0.1% from rewards, with 98% of yield sourced from fees. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current reward contribution to offset weak trading activity. Because the protocol median comparison is unavailable, the relevant test is whether fee generation remains sufficient after price divergence and position management costs.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable, and the seven-day tick-in-range record is also unavailable, so recent range efficiency cannot be verified. As a MEMECOIN pool, XBG-BORG is exposed to abrupt price moves, thin liquidity, and fading attention; emission decay can remove any incentive support, leaving fees as the sole reported yield source. Exit timing matters because a sharp liquidity withdrawal can impair fee generation before price risk becomes obvious.
tollXBG Context
XBG is one side of this concentrated-liquidity pair and its price movement changes both the inventory mix and the likelihood that the position remains in range. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here, so an XBG price move can create execution and rebalancing risk for the LP even when swap fees continue.
tollBORG Context
BORG is the other paired asset, so BORG volatility directly affects the pool's token balance and the LP's exposure to divergence from the entry price. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established here; weak external liquidity would make sharp moves more consequential and could increase the cost of exiting or rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing XBG and BORG into the pool so other users can trade between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. Your holdings can become more concentrated in the weaker-performing coin, and the reported return depends on trading activity rather than rewards.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BH8xeJZ9enrPkjgvRP7LFxzoXWHscaLWLS2NPm9j62Zr
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- XBG (XBGdqJ9P…)
- Token B
- BORG (3dQTr7ro…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
116%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current quote is 4.1% total APR, consisting of 4.0% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Since the reward component is currently absent, further emission decay would not reduce the displayed reward portion, but weak trading flow could still reduce the fee portion.
The current quote is 4.1% total APR, consisting of 4.0% in fees and 0.1% in rewards. Since the reward component is currently absent, further emission decay would not reduce the displayed reward portion, but weak trading flow could still reduce the fee portion.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted 0.1%, so the position already relies on 4.0% in trading fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would return to fee-only economics unless trading volume rises enough to replace them.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted 0.1%, so the position already relies on 4.0% in trading fees. If incentives are introduced and later expire, the pool would return to fee-only economics unless trading volume rises enough to replace them.
The risk is high relative to a mature, deep-liquidity pair because XBG and BORG can move sharply and their external liquidity depth is not established here. The 19/100 score and AVOID verdict reflect weak current conditions, while the unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range records limit historical validation.
The risk is high relative to a mature, deep-liquidity pair because XBG and BORG can move sharply and their external liquidity depth is not established here. The 19/100 score and AVOID verdict reflect weak current conditions, while the unavailable recent impermanent-loss and range records limit historical validation.
For XBG-BORG, an exit signal is sustained TVL deterioration, falling trading flow, or a sharp move that pushes the position outside its intended range. The current AVOID assessment means waiting for a clearer improvement in liquidity and fee generation is preferable to relying on the quoted 4.1% alone.
For XBG-BORG, an exit signal is sustained TVL deterioration, falling trading flow, or a sharp move that pushes the position outside its intended range. The current AVOID assessment means waiting for a clearer improvement in liquidity and fee generation is preferable to relying on the quoted 4.1% alone.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation can change with volume. At the current quote, the gross return reference is 4.0% in fees, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, price divergence, and the cost of rebalancing or exiting.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and fee generation can change with volume. At the current quote, the gross return reference is 4.0% in fees, but actual recovery depends on future trading activity, price divergence, and the cost of rebalancing or exiting.
