new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 59/100 assigns Enter 55/100, Hold 63/100, and Exit 18/100, with the live verdict HOLD. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the pool is being treated as a position to monitor rather than an unqualified new entry, despite its rank of #83 of 3343 meteora-dlmm pools. That assessment would weaken if TVL drains, fee volume collapses, or BATON liquidity deteriorates; it would strengthen only if fee generation remains persistent without a corresponding rise in inventory and exit risk.
Computed 2026-10-30 04:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$356.75K
Total value locked
$501.56K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 553.4%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately limited BATON/SOL tick range and set an exit or recenter rule for two consecutive observations outside that range; do not leave the position unattended if BATON loses liquidity or volume falls materially from the level supporting 1.41x.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 379.1% | — | — |
| Volume | $501.56K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $5.58K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 5 baton-SOL pools
by AI Farmer Score
#346 of 4449 on meteora-dlmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1907 of 150817
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the baton-SOL liquidity pool on Meteora DLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing BATON and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the dollar value can fall if BATON's price or the pool's trading activity drops.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The quoted yield decomposes into 379.1% from trading fees and 120.9% from rewards, with 76% of yield sourced from fees. Rewards currently contribute no stated APR, so emission decay is not the primary APR variable; realized yield depends on whether the current volume and fee capture persist. Reward duration and dependency are not established in the supplied pool data, so no time-to-expiry estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range data is also unavailable, so realized range efficiency and recent LP drag cannot be quantified from the supplied metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, BATON-SOL carries high token-specific volatility, liquidity-withdrawal, and exit-timing risk; a sharp BATON move against SOL can create impermanent loss or leave the position concentrated in the weaker asset. With no stated reward contribution, the main sustainability risk is a fall in trading volume rather than emission decay.
tollbaton Context
BATON is the memecoin side of this pair, so providing liquidity exposes the LP to BATON/SOL price movement rather than to SOL alone. Liquidity depth for BATON outside this pool is not established by the supplied data; thinner external liquidity would make BATON price moves and exits more disruptive. If BATON falls against SOL, an LP can accumulate BATON while fees may not compensate for the resulting inventory shift.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the more established settlement asset in the pair, but its price changes still affect the BATON/SOL ratio and the LP's dollar value. Liquidity depth for SOL elsewhere is not quantified here, although SOL's market role generally makes it the reference asset for assessing BATON's relative performance. A SOL rally against BATON can leave the LP with more BATON exposure after rebalancing.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing BATON and SOL into a shared pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. Your holdings can shift toward the token that performs worse, and the dollar value can fall if BATON's price or the pool's trading activity drops.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BN7CfsGm6Vq9w8NibLZXRGW2tp5y2axwXuLAs85NGakf
- Protocol
- Meteora DLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- baton (Hg5Ja55T…)
- Token B
- SOL (So111111…)
- Created
- 9/11/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
10%
APR
4%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll meteora-dlmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The stated reward APR is 120.9%, while fee APR is 379.1% and fee sustainability is 76%. Because no reward contribution is currently stated, emission decay is not the direct source of the quoted APR decline; lower trading volume would matter more.
The stated reward APR is 120.9%, while fee APR is 379.1% and fee sustainability is 76%. Because no reward contribution is currently stated, emission decay is not the direct source of the quoted APR decline; lower trading volume would matter more.
The supplied figures already show 120.9% reward APR, so expiry would not remove a stated reward component from the current total. The remaining yield would be the fee component, 379.1%, and would continue only if trading volume supports it.
The supplied figures already show 120.9% reward APR, so expiry would not remove a stated reward component from the current total. The remaining yield would be the fee component, 379.1%, and would continue only if trading volume supports it.
Risk is driven by BATON's volatility, uncertain liquidity outside the pool, and the possibility that fees do not offset inventory losses when BATON moves sharply against SOL. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so this pool's realized LP risk cannot be reduced to a recent-history figure.
Risk is driven by BATON's volatility, uncertain liquidity outside the pool, and the possibility that fees do not offset inventory losses when BATON moves sharply against SOL. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are unavailable, so this pool's realized LP risk cannot be reduced to a recent-history figure.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained drop in fee volume, a material TVL drain, or BATON leaving your chosen range for two consecutive observations. For this pool, an exit is also more defensible if the fee-based APR 379.1% falls materially because there is no stated reward APR to replace it.
Use a predefined trigger such as a sustained drop in fee volume, a material TVL drain, or BATON leaving your chosen range for two consecutive observations. For this pool, an exit is also more defensible if the fee-based APR 379.1% falls materially because there is no stated reward APR to replace it.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range exposure are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. A simple fee-only proxy would be 12 months divided by 379.1%, but that is not a true break-even time because it ignores price divergence, out-of-range periods, and changing volume.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because recent impermanent-loss history and range exposure are unavailable, and future volume is uncertain. A simple fee-only proxy would be 12 months divided by 379.1%, but that is not a true break-even time because it ignores price divergence, out-of-range periods, and changing volume.
