SOL-SPYxon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $137.15K
- APR
- 494.3% APR
- 24h Volume
- $284.82K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- BS9uyGV6…HxfL · observed 2026-09-04
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 58/100, with Enter at 53/100, Hold at 64/100, and Exit at 18/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Its #58-of-4410 rank among raydium-clmm pools places it relatively high in the observed pool set, but the Hold signal implies monitoring rather than treating the score as an unconditional entry signal. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume fell, fee APR collapsed, or SPYX exit liquidity deteriorated; it could strengthen if fee generation persisted while liquidity and execution quality improved.
Computed 2026-09-04 13:18 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$137.15K
Total value locked
$284.82K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up494.3%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 215.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately bounded tick range and set a rebalance or exit rule for sustained price movement outside that range; exit rather than repeatedly widening the range if fee generation falls materially below 178.7% or pool liquidity begins draining.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 494.3% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 178.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $284.82K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $712.05 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 5 SOL-SPYx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#215 of 14424 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #1565 of 105013
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SPYx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPYX into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the token that underperforms, and the value of your deposit can be lower than simply holding both tokens if their prices move apart.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported yield decomposes into 178.7% fee APR and 315.6% reward APR, with 36% of yield attributed to trading fees. This makes current returns dependent on swap activity rather than a stated reward schedule, but it does not remove the risk that fees decline if volume or liquidity changes. No reliable reward-duration estimate is available.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and seven-day tick-in-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range-utilization cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SPYX is exposed to sharp repricing, thin exit liquidity, and rapid shifts in trading volume. Emission decay and exit timing still matter: even if current yield is fee-funded, a fall in activity can reduce fees quickly, while memecoin liquidity can deteriorate before an LP exits.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established, liquid asset in this pair and typically provides the deeper external market for valuation and exits. SOL price movement relative to SPYX determines the pool's inventory mix and can create impermanent loss when the two assets diverge. SOL strength alone does not protect the LP if SPYX falls or becomes difficult to trade.
tollSPYx Context
SPYX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and available liquidity are likely more sensitive to attention, listings, and holder concentration than SOL. A sharp SPYX move changes the pool's SOL/SPYX balance and can leave the LP holding more of the weaker asset after arbitrage. External SPYX liquidity and the ability to exit without substantial price impact should be checked separately from this pool's displayed TVL.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPYX into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can end up with more of the token that underperforms, and the value of your deposit can be lower than simply holding both tokens if their prices move apart.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BS9uyGV6XmNnPkM4f3xgxCdQEaFv7RSKs6fwrpvYHxfL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SPYx (XsoCS1Tf…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
1%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reported yield is split between 178.7% from fees and 315.6% from rewards, with 36% of yield coming from fees. If any reward program decays, the reward component falls, while the fee component remains tied to actual trading activity.
The current reported yield is split between 178.7% from fees and 315.6% from rewards, with 36% of yield coming from fees. If any reward program decays, the reward component falls, while the fee component remains tied to actual trading activity.
The reward component represented by 315.6% would disappear or decline when incentives end. Because 36% of current yield is fee-derived, post-incentive returns would depend mainly on whether the pool retains enough SOL-SPYX trading volume and liquidity.
The reward component represented by 315.6% would disappear or decline when incentives end. Because 36% of current yield is fee-derived, post-incentive returns would depend mainly on whether the pool retains enough SOL-SPYX trading volume and liquidity.
Risk is high because SPYX can reprice sharply against SOL, external SPYX liquidity may be limited, and memecoin volume can disappear quickly. Recent seven-day IL and tick-range data are unavailable, so the current magnitude of price-divergence and range risk cannot be measured from the supplied metrics.
Risk is high because SPYX can reprice sharply against SOL, external SPYX liquidity may be limited, and memecoin volume can disappear quickly. Recent seven-day IL and tick-range data are unavailable, so the current magnitude of price-divergence and range risk cannot be measured from the supplied metrics.
Use a predefined trigger such as sustained movement outside your tick range, a material TVL drain, or fee generation falling well below 178.7%. For SOL-SPYX, exiting before SPYX liquidity deteriorates can matter more than waiting for a displayed APR to adjust.
Use a predefined trigger such as sustained movement outside your tick range, a material TVL drain, or fee generation falling well below 178.7%. For SOL-SPYX, exiting before SPYX liquidity deteriorates can matter more than waiting for a displayed APR to adjust.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. A useful estimate requires tracking realized fees against the position's mark-to-market loss, with 36% indicating that fees—not rewards—are the current source of reported yield.
There is no defensible fixed break-even period because seven-day IL history is unavailable and fee income changes with volume. A useful estimate requires tracking realized fees against the position's mark-to-market loss, with 36% indicating that fees—not rewards—are the current source of reported yield.
