SOL-SPYxon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $960.12K
- APR
- 84.8% APR
- 24h Volume
- $637.24K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- BS9uyGV6…HxfL · observed 2026-10-21
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 59/100 places this pool near the lower end of the raydium-clmm set, with Enter at 54/100, Hold at 65/100, and Exit at 16/100. The live verdict is HOLD; ai_engine=hold is outweighed by a CRITICAL scanner result and a strong unopposed EXIT signal. Its rank of #1720 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools indicates that the fee-funded APR and trading activity do not compensate for the pool's current risk assessment. The view would improve if the scanner cleared, fee volume persisted without liquidity deterioration, and the pool demonstrated stable range utilization; a TVL drain, yield collapse, or worsening SPYX liquidity would reinforce the exit assessment.
Computed 2026-10-21 03:39 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$960.12K
Total value locked
$637.24K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up84.8%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 47.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range that you can monitor actively, and rebalance when price approaches either outer tick rather than waiting for the position to become one-sided. Treat a persistent CRITICAL scanner state or a clear fall in fee generation as an exit trigger, consistent with the current unopposed EXIT signal.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 84.8% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 61.5% | — | — |
| Volume | $637.24K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $1.59K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#3 of 6 SOL-SPYx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#425 of 19264 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 2% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2594 of 147092
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SPYx liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPYX into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token falls in relative value, and the memecoin may become harder to sell if trading activity fades.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The reported Total APR of 84.8% decomposes into a fee-only APR of 61.5% and a reward-only APR of 23.3%. Fee sustainability is 72%, so the stated yield depends on continued swap volume rather than token emissions. Reward duration is not established for this pool, making any future incentive contribution uncertain; fee income should therefore be evaluated independently from temporary farm incentives.
shieldRisk Assessment
A reliable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so realized loss and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SPYX is exposed to sharp SPYX repricing, shallow exit liquidity, and rapid changes in correlatedness with SOL. Emission decay is an additional family-level risk where incentives exist: LPs should not assume current fee conditions will offset a later price divergence, and exit timing matters if attention or liquidity leaves the token.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana venues than SPYX. For this LP, a SOL price move changes the required inventory balance against SPYX; a move that is not matched by SPYX can increase divergence loss even when swap fees remain available.
tollSPYx Context
SPYX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity and price discovery are likely more dependent on concentrated trading activity than SOL's. A sharp SPYX rally or decline can push an LP position toward one asset, while reduced attention can widen execution costs and make timely exit more difficult.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPYX into a shared trading pool and receiving a share of swap fees. Your holdings can shift toward whichever token falls in relative value, and the memecoin may become harder to sell if trading activity fades.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BS9uyGV6XmNnPkM4f3xgxCdQEaFv7RSKs6fwrpvYHxfL
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SPYx (XsoCS1Tf…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current return is reported as 84.8%, consisting of 61.5% in fees and 23.3% in rewards. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; fee income would still depend on volume of $637K relative to liquidity of $960K.
The current return is reported as 84.8%, consisting of 61.5% in fees and 23.3% in rewards. If future incentives are introduced and then decay, the reward portion would fall; fee income would still depend on volume of $637K relative to liquidity of $960K.
The reward-only portion, currently represented by 23.3%, would no longer support the APR, leaving fee income of 61.5% as the relevant yield source. Because fee sustainability is 72%, the position should be reassessed if volume-to-TVL of 0.66x declines.
The reward-only portion, currently represented by 23.3%, would no longer support the APR, leaving fee income of 61.5% as the relevant yield source. Because fee sustainability is 72%, the position should be reassessed if volume-to-TVL of 0.66x declines.
Risk is elevated because SPYX can move sharply or lose liquidity independently of SOL, creating divergence losses and difficult exits. This pool has a Wealthville Score of 59/100 and a live verdict of HOLD, while recent loss and range-utilization history is not available for a more precise estimate.
Risk is elevated because SPYX can move sharply or lose liquidity independently of SOL, creating divergence losses and difficult exits. This pool has a Wealthville Score of 59/100 and a live verdict of HOLD, while recent loss and range-utilization history is not available for a more precise estimate.
For SOL-SPYX, an exit is reasonable if the CRITICAL scanner state persists, the unopposed EXIT signal remains, TVL drains, or fee generation falls materially from the current 61.5% fee-only APR. Also consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your active range and you cannot monitor or rebalance it.
For SOL-SPYX, an exit is reasonable if the CRITICAL scanner state persists, the unopposed EXIT signal remains, TVL drains, or fee generation falls materially from the current 61.5% fee-only APR. Also consider exiting when price approaches the edge of your active range and you cannot monitor or rebalance it.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable. Fees currently account for 61.5% of stated APR, but that does not establish how long they would take to offset a future SOL-SPYX price divergence.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are unavailable. Fees currently account for 61.5% of stated APR, but that does not establish how long they would take to offset a future SOL-SPYX price divergence.
