ZEC-ZCATon Raydium CLMMCLMMHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $1.07M
- APR
- 500.0% APR
- 24h Volume
- $664.67K 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 1.00% fee
- Pool address
- BTccxxTF…61Rc · observed 2026-10-09
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 50/100, with Enter at 44/100, Hold at 58/100, and Exit at 23/100. The live verdict is HOLD, driven by ai_engine=hold, placing the pool at rank #1254 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools. In practical terms, this is a monitoring stance rather than a signal that fee APR is dependable: the current case rests on 240.0% fee generation, $1.1M of liquidity, and 0.62x turnover relative to TVL. A sustained TVL drain, materially lower volume, a collapse in fee APR, or repeated out-of-range conditions would change the assessment toward exit; persistent fee volume with stable liquidity would support retaining the hold view.
Computed 2026-10-09 15:42 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$1.07M
Total value locked
$664.67K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up500.0%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 244.0%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Wait & Monitor
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a narrow range centered on the current ZEC/ZCAT price only if you can monitor it frequently; set a rebalance trigger when spot exits the range or moves roughly 20% from the range midpoint. Remove liquidity rather than passively leaving it idle if volume falls materially below $665K or fee generation no longer compensates for the resulting inventory imbalance.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 500.0% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 240.0% | — | — |
| Volume | $664.67K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $6.68K | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#2 of 9 ZEC-ZCAT pools
by AI Farmer Score
#502 of 18470 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3451 of 132693
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the ZEC-ZCAT liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and ZCAT into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds, while you receive a portion of trading fees. The value of your deposit can change because ZEC and ZCAT may move differently, and the current stated return is 500.0% before considering that price risk.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The displayed yield decomposes into 240.0% fee APR and 260.0% reward APR, for a total of 500.0%. 48% of yield comes from trading fees, so realized returns depend on continued swap activity rather than a current token-emission stream. Reward dependency and any incentive end date are not established; fee APR should therefore be treated as variable, not as a fixed return.
shieldRisk Assessment
A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and no seven-day tick-in-range statistic is available to show how consistently positions would have earned fees. As a MEMECOIN pool, ZCAT can move sharply relative to ZEC, pushing a concentrated position out of range and leaving the LP holding more of the declining asset. Emission decay is not the current primary risk because the displayed reward component is 260.0%; exit timing instead depends on price dislocation, usable range, liquidity withdrawals, and declining fee flow.
tollZEC Context
ZEC is the reference asset paired with ZCAT and provides the relatively established side of this pool's price relationship. External liquidity depth for ZEC is not supplied here, so it should not be assumed that this pool is the best venue for ZEC exposure. A ZEC move against ZCAT changes the pool composition and can create impermanent loss for the LP.
tollZCAT Context
ZCAT is the memecoin side of the pair, making its liquidity and price behavior central to the pool's risk. A sharp ZCAT decline can leave the LP with greater exposure to ZCAT as arbitrage rebalances the position, while a sharp rally can leave the LP with less ZCAT upside than simply holding it. Its volatility also increases the chance that a concentrated position moves outside its active range.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing ZEC and ZCAT into a shared trading pool so swaps can use your funds, while you receive a portion of trading fees. The value of your deposit can change because ZEC and ZCAT may move differently, and the current stated return is 500.0% before considering that price risk.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BTccxxTFi7a9xJTE1exKn38Jgie35s6gNeRxd8DM61Rc
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- ZEC (A7bdiYdS…)
- Token B
- ZCAT (HcRLc9VD…)
- Created
- 8/31/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
1%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
The current reward-only APR is 260.0%, while fee APR is 240.0% and total APR is 500.0%. Because the displayed yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main source of APR reduction; lower trading activity is.
The current reward-only APR is 260.0%, while fee APR is 240.0% and total APR is 500.0%. Because the displayed yield is fee-funded, emission decay is not currently the main source of APR reduction; lower trading activity is.
With reward-only APR at 260.0%, expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream from the displayed return. LP income would still depend on 240.0%, which can fall if ZEC-ZCAT trading volume declines.
With reward-only APR at 260.0%, expiration would not remove a currently reported reward stream from the displayed return. LP income would still depend on 240.0%, which can fall if ZEC-ZCAT trading volume declines.
The pool combines ZEC with a MEMECOIN asset, so relative price moves can create impermanent loss and push a concentrated position out of range. $1.1M of liquidity and $665K of daily volume provide context, but 0.62x turnover does not eliminate ZCAT-specific price or exit risk.
The pool combines ZEC with a MEMECOIN asset, so relative price moves can create impermanent loss and push a concentrated position out of range. $1.1M of liquidity and $665K of daily volume provide context, but 0.62x turnover does not eliminate ZCAT-specific price or exit risk.
Consider exiting when the position moves outside its active range, ZCAT suffers a sustained price break, liquidity drains from $1.1M, or fee generation falls materially below the level implied by 240.0%. A loss of trading activity is more relevant here than waiting for an emission schedule, because the displayed reward APR is 260.0%.
Consider exiting when the position moves outside its active range, ZCAT suffers a sustained price break, liquidity drains from $1.1M, or fee generation falls materially below the level implied by 240.0%. A loss of trading activity is more relevant here than waiting for an emission schedule, because the displayed reward APR is 260.0%.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because a seven-day IL history is unavailable and future fee income is variable. The nominal fee component is 240.0%, but it only offsets impermanent loss if trading fees accumulate faster than the inventory loss caused by ZEC-ZCAT price divergence.
There is no reliable break-even estimate because a seven-day IL history is unavailable and future fee income is variable. The nominal fee component is 240.0%, but it only offsets impermanent loss if trading fees accumulate faster than the inventory loss caused by ZEC-ZCAT price divergence.
