WealthVille
MET
M
USDC
U

MET-USDCon Meteora DAMM v2Active

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $2.97M
APR
13.2% APR
24h Volume
$116.97K 24h vol
Pool address
BnztueWc…SLu1 · observed 2026-10-27
42D · Weak

Wealthville Score

Verdict HOLD · 58% confidence

ai_engine=hold
How this score works →
Enter37

new capital

Hold49

keep position

Exit31

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score is 42/100, with Enter at 37/100, Hold at 49/100, and Exit at 31/100; the live verdict is HOLD and the stated verdict driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #177 among 1834 meteora-damm-v2 pools places it well above the lower-ranked portion of the set, but not among the leading pools. The assessment would weaken if TVL drained, volume-to-TVL declined, or fee APR collapsed; it would improve if sustained trading volume increased without a corresponding rise in liquidity or MET price risk.

Computed 2026-10-27 11:50 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$2.97M

Total value locked

$116.97K

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

13.2%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ 10.0%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 53m agoTVL ↑1.8%
schedule

AI Verdict

Wait & Monitor

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 94% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 75/100
tips_and_updates

Use a deliberately monitored range and reassess the position if rolling volume-to-TVL falls below the current 0.04x for two consecutive days; with no reported range-utilization history, avoid treating a passive range as durable without checking whether swaps continue to generate fees.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR13.2%——
Fee APR12.4%——
Volume$116.97K——
Fees Earned$938.80——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
11.5%(trailing 24h fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−1.5%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
10.0%(after IL + repositioning)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.04x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0003
Fee APR Sustainability
94% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#6 of 37 MET-USDC pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#222 of 2501 on meteora-damm-v2

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 3% of all Solana pools

overall rank #3477 of 150817

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the MET-USDC liquidity pool on Meteora DAMM v2. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive trading-fee income, but a large MET price move can leave you holding a different mix of MET and USDC than you deposited.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield consists of a fee-only APR of 12.4% and a reward-only APR of 0.8%. 94% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so there is no current reward component cushioning a decline in swap activity. A reward end date is not established in the supplied data; for this memecoin pool, fee income and exit timing matter more than emission capture.

shieldRisk Assessment

A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, so recent divergence between MET and USDC cannot be quantified from this data. Seven-day tick-in-range coverage is also not reported, leaving range utilization and out-of-range exposure unresolved. As a MEMECOIN pool, MET can experience abrupt price moves and liquidity withdrawal; any emissions can decay, while exiting after a sharp MET move may crystallize divergence losses before accumulated fees offset them.

tollMET Context

MET is the volatile side of this pair, so its price movement against USDC determines most of the pool's divergence risk and can shift the position's asset mix toward MET or USDC. The supplied data does not quantify MET's liquidity depth elsewhere, so this pool's $3.0M should not be treated as evidence of broad MET market depth.

tollUSDC Context

USDC provides the dollar-denominated side of the pair and is generally the less volatile asset in this comparison. Its broader Solana liquidity is not quantified here; for this LP, a MET move against USDC changes inventory composition and determines whether fees compensate for that divergence.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing MET and USDC into a shared pool that traders use to swap between them. You receive trading-fee income, but a large MET price move can leave you holding a different mix of MET and USDC than you deposited.

token

Token Details

MET
METMeteoraSolana
Explorer

Meteora (MET) — one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

USDC
USDCUSD CoinSolana

USDC is a fully collateralized US dollar stablecoin. USDC is the bridge between dollars and trading on exchanges.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
BnztueWcXv93mgW7yJe8WYpnCxpz34nujPhfjQT6SLu1
Protocol
Meteora DAMM v2
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
AMM
Token A
MET (METvsvVR…)
Token B
USDC (EPjFWdd5…)
Created
7/29/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 0.8%, while fee-only APR is 12.4%. Because 94% of the stated yield comes from fees, emission decay would have limited direct impact now but could matter if future incentives are added.

The current reward-only APR is 0.8%, while fee-only APR is 12.4%. Because 94% of the stated yield comes from fees, emission decay would have limited direct impact now but could matter if future incentives are added.

If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on trading fees. For the current breakdown, the reward-only APR is 0.8% and the fee-only APR is 12.4%.

If incentives are introduced and later expire, the reward component would fall away and the remaining return would depend on trading fees. For the current breakdown, the reward-only APR is 0.8% and the fee-only APR is 12.4%.

The main risks are MET's potentially abrupt price movement, divergence from USDC, and reduced fee income if trading activity falls. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available, so the recent severity of those risks cannot be measured here.

The main risks are MET's potentially abrupt price movement, divergence from USDC, and reduced fee income if trading activity falls. Recent seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range readings are not available, so the recent severity of those risks cannot be measured here.

Consider exiting when fee generation no longer compensates for MET's price divergence, when volume-to-TVL persistently falls below 0.04x, or when the pool's TVL begins a sustained decline. Waiting for emission changes is less relevant here because the current reward-only APR is 0.8%.

Consider exiting when fee generation no longer compensates for MET's price divergence, when volume-to-TVL persistently falls below 0.04x, or when the pool's TVL begins a sustained decline. Waiting for emission changes is less relevant here because the current reward-only APR is 0.8%.

There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future trading volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at a fee-only APR of 12.4%, but whether that offsets MET-USDC divergence depends on the size and duration of the price move.

There is no defensible fixed break-even time because recent impermanent loss is not reported and future trading volume is uncertain. Fees accrue at a fee-only APR of 12.4%, but whether that offsets MET-USDC divergence depends on the size and duration of the price move.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights