new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places SOL-TEST in a middle assessment rather than a strong entry case: Enter is 15/100, Hold is 20/100, and Exit is 80/100, with the live verdict EXIT. Its #557 of 2403 ranking among raydium-amm pools indicates a relatively stronger position than many listed pools, but the verdict driver is only ai_engine=hold and does not establish durable demand. A material TVL drain, further volume deterioration, fee-yield collapse, or a sharp increase in TEST volatility would change the assessment toward exit; sustained volume and stable liquidity would provide the basis for reassessing the hold view.
Computed 2026-07-24 06:20 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$109.24K
Total value locked
$1.21K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -21.8%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set an exit review when pool TVL falls below four-fifths of $109K or when 24-hour volume remains near $1K while the position's fee accrual weakens; without reliable tick-range data, avoid assuming a narrow concentrated range is being used efficiently.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.2% | — | — |
| Volume | $1.21K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $3.03 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 4 SOL-test pools
by AI Farmer Score
#574 of 34958 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2138 of 66494
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-test liquidity pool on raydium-amm. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TEST into a shared pool so other traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your final amounts can differ from what you deposited if SOL and TEST prices move apart, and memecoin liquidity can be difficult to exit.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield breaks down into 1.2% from trading fees and 0.0% from rewards. 99% of the stated yield comes from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, and no reward-expiry schedule is provided, so future APR should be assessed primarily against trading activity rather than assumed emissions.
shieldRisk Assessment
The dashboard does not provide a seven-day impermanent-loss reading or a seven-day tick-in-range reading, so recent divergence costs and range utilization cannot be quantified here. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-TEST is exposed to abrupt TEST price moves, shallow liquidity, and exit slippage; emission decay and reward changes can reduce the reason to remain in the position, making exit timing important when volume or liquidity weakens.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established network asset in this pair and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana venues than TEST. SOL price moves change the pair's relative price and can create impermanent loss for an LP when SOL and TEST do not move together, even if the pool continues generating fees.
tolltest Context
TEST is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price discovery and liquidity are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. A sharp TEST rally or decline can shift the pool composition and increase inventory imbalance, while thin external liquidity can make an LP exit more costly.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and TEST into a shared pool so other traders can swap between them. You receive a portion of trading fees, but your final amounts can differ from what you deposited if SOL and TEST prices move apart, and memecoin liquidity can be difficult to exit.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- BrvNhGJQiMdNUrr8ttr7nbabuV3XyWM1FvRBXjSeTuDW
- Protocol
- raydium-amm
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- test (4Hcm1TfA…)
- Created
- 4/22/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-amm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward yield is 0.0%, while fee yield is 1.2% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component without changing fee income unless trading activity also changes.
Current reward yield is 0.0%, while fee yield is 1.2% and 99% of yield comes from fees. If emissions are introduced or reduced later, decay would lower the reward component without changing fee income unless trading activity also changes.
Because current reward yield is 0.0%, the immediate effect of an incentive expiry would be limited to the reward component, while fee income would remain tied to trading volume. With total APR at 1.2%, a lower-volume pool could see its remaining yield become less meaningful after any incentives end.
Because current reward yield is 0.0%, the immediate effect of an incentive expiry would be limited to the reward component, while fee income would remain tied to trading volume. With total APR at 1.2%, a lower-volume pool could see its remaining yield become less meaningful after any incentives end.
Risk is elevated because TEST can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has $109K TVL against $1K in 24-hour volume. The pool's fee-funded structure does not remove price divergence, shallow-liquidity, or exit-slippage risk.
Risk is elevated because TEST can move sharply against SOL, and the pool has $109K TVL against $1K in 24-hour volume. The pool's fee-funded structure does not remove price divergence, shallow-liquidity, or exit-slippage risk.
For SOL-TEST, review an exit if TVL falls materially below $109K, volume remains weak relative to that liquidity, or TEST experiences a sharp one-sided move. A decline in fee income from 1.2% would also reduce the compensation for holding the position.
For SOL-TEST, review an exit if TVL falls materially below $109K, volume remains weak relative to that liquidity, or TEST experiences a sharp one-sided move. A decline in fee income from 1.2% would also reduce the compensation for holding the position.
A break-even period cannot be estimated from the supplied data because a seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The fee component is 1.2% annualized, so recovery would require sustained fee accrual and a return of the SOL-TEST price relationship toward the entry level.
A break-even period cannot be estimated from the supplied data because a seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The fee component is 1.2% annualized, so recovery would require sustained fee accrual and a return of the SOL-TEST price relationship toward the entry level.
