WealthVille
SOL
S
ANALOS
A

SOL-ANALOSon Raydium CLMMCLMM

Chain
Solana
TVL
TVL $20.94K
APR
0.6% APR
24h Volume
$16.94 24h vol
Fee tier
1.00% fee
Pool address
C2ZiKKio…XLZ3 · observed 2026-10-09
17F · Poor

Wealthville Score

Verdict EXIT · 70% confidence

ai_engine=holdscanner=CRITICAL
How this score works →
Enter15

new capital

Hold20

keep position

Exit80

urgency to leave

The Wealthville Score of 17/100 places this pool in a middle-risk, middle-utility area rather than among the strongest raydium-clmm opportunities. Enter 15/100 / Hold 20/100 / Exit 80/100 and the live verdict EXIT reflect the stated ai_engine=hold driver; the pool ranks #1534 of 8415 raydium-clmm pools. The assessment would weaken if $21K drains, $17 declines, or fee income collapses, and it could improve if liquidity deepens while sustained volume keeps 0.6% supported.

Computed 2026-10-09 07:08 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.

Liquidityhelp

lock

$20.94K

Total value locked

$16.94

24h volume

×0.0 turnover

Yieldhelp

trending_up

0.6%

advertised APR

Fee yield, annualized

≈ -63.8%

adjusted · net of IL (est.)

1.00% fee

My Position

account_balance_wallet
Live DataUpdated 876m agoTVL ↑2.5%
block

AI Verdict

Avoid

WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.

check_circleFee-driven yield: 100% of APR from trading fees
warningElevated risk score: 80/100
tips_and_updates

Use a monitored range centered on the current SOL-ANALOS price, and rebalance or exit when price leaves that range or when several sessions of volume fall materially below $17; do not leave the position unattended while relying on the stated fee APR.

syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background

table_chart

Performance Breakdown

Metric24h / Day7d / Week30d / Month
Total APR0.6%——
Fee APR0.6%——
Volume$16.94——
Fees Earned$0.17——

Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.

analytics

Efficiency Metrics

Computed

Deterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.

Sustainable Gross APY
7.4%(trailing 7d fees)
Impermanent-Loss Drag
−71.3%(realized, 30d annualized)
Adjusted Net APY (est.)
-63.8%(drags exceed yield)
Volume / TVL Ratio (24h)
0.00x
Fee Yield per $1 TVL / Day
$0.0000
Fee APR Sustainability
100% from trading fees(sustainable)
leaderboard

Pool Rankings

compare_arrows

#1 of 1 SOL-ANALOS pools

by AI Farmer Score

hub

#2062 of 18657 on raydium-clmm

by AI Farmer Score

leaderboard

Top 17% of all Solana pools

overall rank #22604 of 135723

lightbulb

How This Pool Works

Beginner Friendly

This page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ANALOS liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ANALOS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts you withdraw can be worth less than simply keeping the two tokens if their prices move apart, especially during a sharp memecoin move.

description

Pool Analysis

trending_upYield Source Breakdown

The yield consists of a fee-only APR of 0.6% and a reward-only APR of 0.0%. 100% of the stated yield comes from trading fees, so returns depend on continued swap activity rather than a reward schedule. Reward duration is not established for this pool, and the fee rate can fall if volume contracts or liquidity changes.

shieldRisk Assessment

A seven-day impermanent-loss reading is unavailable, and recent tick-in-range history is also unavailable, so observed range efficiency cannot be validated. This is a MEMECOIN pool: price gaps, rapid liquidity withdrawal, and one-sided demand can reduce fee income while increasing the cost of remaining in range. Emission decay is not currently the main risk because the reward component is 0.0%; exit timing still matters if trading activity or market depth deteriorates.

tollSOL Context

SOL is the base asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than ANALOS, which can make SOL the more stable side of the position. SOL price moves change the pool's relative price and can push a concentrated-liquidity position out of range or create divergence from simply holding the two assets.

tollANALOS Context

ANALOS is the memecoin side of the pair, so its liquidity is more dependent on this market and nearby venues than SOL's. A sharp ANALOS rally or decline can create impermanent loss relative to holding SOL and ANALOS separately, while weak ANALOS demand can reduce swaps and fee generation.

lightbulbSimple Explanation

Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ANALOS into a shared trading pool so other users can swap between them. You receive trading fees, but the amounts you withdraw can be worth less than simply keeping the two tokens if their prices move apart, especially during a sharp memecoin move.

token

Token Details

SOL
SOLWrapped SOLSolana

Solana is a high-performance blockchain supporting builders around the world creating crypto apps that scale today.

ANALOS
ANALOSSolana
Explorer

ANALOS is one of the two assets paired in this liquidity pool.

info

Pool Details

Pool Address
C2ZiKKioUgoDiA7RvJEg4wPednx8eUyHdvpf2RaGXLZ3
Protocol
Raydium CLMM
Chain
solana
Fee Tier
—
Pool Type
Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
Token A
SOL (So111111…)
Token B
ANALOS (5Z1xHaFj…)
Created
8/14/2026
lock

Non-Custodial

Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.

source

Verified Data Sources

Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield

psychology

AI-Powered Analysis

Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data

⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.

quiz

Frequently Asked Questions

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.6%, so the stated return is presently driven by trading fees rather than emissions. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall without directly changing fees from swaps.

The current reward-only APR is 0.0%, while the fee-only APR is 0.6%, so the stated return is presently driven by trading fees rather than emissions. If future incentives are introduced and later decay, the reward component would fall without directly changing fees from swaps.

The pool already reports a reward-only APR of 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently material reward stream. The remaining return would depend on fees generated by $17 of volume against $21K of liquidity.

The pool already reports a reward-only APR of 0.0%, so an incentive expiry would not remove a currently material reward stream. The remaining return would depend on fees generated by $17 of volume against $21K of liquidity.

Risk is elevated because ANALOS can move sharply, liquidity is $21K, and fee income depends on $17 of activity. SOL's deeper external liquidity does not eliminate price divergence, range exits, or the possibility that ANALOS demand and pool depth weaken.

Risk is elevated because ANALOS can move sharply, liquidity is $21K, and fee income depends on $17 of activity. SOL's deeper external liquidity does not eliminate price divergence, range exits, or the possibility that ANALOS demand and pool depth weaken.

Consider exiting when the price leaves your selected range, when swap activity no longer supports 0.6%, or when pool depth deteriorates from $21K. A sustained decline in 0.00x would also weaken the fee case for remaining in the position.

Consider exiting when the price leaves your selected range, when swap activity no longer supports 0.6%, or when pool depth deteriorates from $21K. A sustained decline in 0.00x would also weaken the fee case for remaining in the position.

A reliable break-even period cannot be estimated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether fees accruing at 0.6% persist long enough to offset the loss caused by SOL and ANALOS price divergence, which depends on future volume and volatility.

A reliable break-even period cannot be estimated because seven-day impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant comparison is whether fees accruing at 0.6% persist long enough to offset the loss caused by SOL and ANALOS price divergence, which depends on future volume and volatility.

Latest insights

Research, Recaps & Solana Alpha

Data-driven yield analysis and weekly market wraps — written for active LPs.

All insights