new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The 17/100 Wealthville Score places PTN-LEAN in a middling risk-adjusted position, while Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100 make Hold the live verdict, EXIT. The ai_engine=hold driver indicates that the system is not treating the current fee rate and trading activity as a clear entry signal, despite the pool ranking #1794 of 18146 raydium-amm pools. The assessment would weaken if $6K drains, the 0.01x turnover compresses, or 1.6% falls as trading activity fades; persistent fee generation with stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-11-06 03:27 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$6.30K
Total value locked
$73.14
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up1.6%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -5.7%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Monitor the volume-to-TVL ratio daily and set a predefined exit or review trigger when it falls materially below 0.01x for two consecutive observations; without reported tick-range data, avoid relying on a narrow range that cannot be monitored quantitatively.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 1.6% | — | — |
| Volume | $73.14 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.18 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 PTN-LEAN pools
by AI Farmer Score
#13080 of 97331 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 13% of all Solana pools
overall rank #18922 of 155680
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the PTN-LEAN liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing PTN and LEAN into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If one token changes price much more than the other, the pool may return a different mix of tokens and your position can be worth less than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The stated yield consists of 1.6% fee APR and 0.0% reward APR, so the reported return is currently generated by swaps rather than farm emissions. Fee sustainability is 99%. Reward dependency is not established, and there is no current reward allocation to model for emission decay; the relevant variable is whether trading volume remains sufficient to support the fee rate.
shieldRisk Assessment
Seven-day impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range history are not reported, so recent loss behavior and range utilization cannot be quantified from the supplied data. As a MEMECOIN pool, PTN-LEAN is exposed to sharp, correlated price moves, liquidity migration, and adverse LP inventory changes; high fees may coincide with the same volatility that increases LP losses. With no current reward APR, emission decay is not the main present risk, but exit timing still matters because volume and fees can fall quickly after speculative activity subsides.
tollPTN Context
PTN is one side of this pool and determines part of the LP's inventory exposure alongside LEAN. The supplied data does not establish PTN's liquidity depth elsewhere; if PTN moves sharply relative to LEAN, the pool rebalances the LP toward the weaker-performing asset and can produce impermanent loss.
tollLEAN Context
LEAN is the second asset in the pair and provides the other source of price and liquidity risk. Its external liquidity depth is not established here, so a LEAN price move or thin off-pool market can affect both the value of the deposited inventory and the ability to exit without substantial price impact.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing PTN and LEAN into the pool so traders can swap between them, while you receive part of the trading fees. If one token changes price much more than the other, the pool may return a different mix of tokens and your position can be worth less than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- C9QXaGp2kVa6zNzKYYACC3r3YXkfxwKBip2wNKucb7dY
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- PTN (PTNzAfFA…)
- Token B
- LEAN (2Hm8qcnu…)
- Created
- 9/21/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
9%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current emissions contribute 0.0% reward APR, so emission decay does not currently explain the pool's return. The reported 1.6% APR is driven by 1.6% in fees, which depends on continued trading activity.
Current emissions contribute 0.0% reward APR, so emission decay does not currently explain the pool's return. The reported 1.6% APR is driven by 1.6% in fees, which depends on continued trading activity.
The current reward component is already 0.0%, so the immediate effect of incentive expiry would be limited if fee conditions remain unchanged. The position would then rely on 1.6% from swaps, and total APR could decline if volume falls.
The current reward component is already 0.0%, so the immediate effect of incentive expiry would be limited if fee conditions remain unchanged. The position would then rely on 1.6% from swaps, and total APR could decline if volume falls.
The risk is material because PTN and LEAN can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. The pool's reported $6K TVL and 0.01x turnover indicate active trading, but seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available to quantify recent LP outcomes.
The risk is material because PTN and LEAN can experience sharp price moves, thin external liquidity, and rapid changes in trading activity. The pool's reported $6K TVL and 0.01x turnover indicate active trading, but seven-day impermanent-loss and tick-range history are not available to quantify recent LP outcomes.
Set the decision in advance around falling fee generation, a sustained decline from 0.01x, a drain from $6K, or a material drop from 1.6%. Exit timing deserves particular attention when speculative volume is driving fees, because that activity can reverse before the LP can rebalance.
Set the decision in advance around falling fee generation, a sustained decline from 0.01x, a drain from $6K, or a material drop from 1.6%. Exit timing deserves particular attention when speculative volume is driving fees, because that activity can reverse before the LP can rebalance.
It cannot be estimated reliably without seven-day impermanent-loss data, the price path of PTN and LEAN, and the persistence of 1.6%. At 1.6%, fees could offset price divergence over time, but the calculation fails if volume contracts or either token experiences a large move.
It cannot be estimated reliably without seven-day impermanent-loss data, the price path of PTN and LEAN, and the persistence of 1.6%. At 1.6%, fees could offset price divergence over time, but the calculation fails if volume contracts or either token experiences a large move.
