SOL-SPCXxon Orca WhirlpoolWhirlpoolHigh Yield
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $48.73K
- APR
- 84.5% APR
- 24h Volume
- $44.41K 24h vol
- Pool address
- CN32jwmQ…e816 · observed 2026-11-11
Wealthville Score
Verdict REDUCE · 59% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score of 38/100 with Enter 34/100, Hold 44/100, and Exit 50/100 supports the live REDUCE assessment: the pool is being treated as a monitor-and-hold position rather than a clear new entry or immediate exit. Its ai_engine=hold driver is consistent with fee-funded yield and substantial current turnover, but the pool ranks #1864 of 4356 orca-whirlpool pools, so it is not among the strongest-ranked alternatives. The assessment would weaken if TVL drains, volume falls, fee APR collapses, or SPCXX liquidity deteriorates; it would improve only with sustained fee volume, stable liquidity, and better evidence that positions remain in range.
Computed 2026-11-11 14:19 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$48.73K
Total value locked
$44.41K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up84.5%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ 209.2%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Proceed with Caution
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a range centered on the current SOL/SPCXX price and set an alert at both boundaries; rebalance or exit when price reaches either boundary rather than waiting for prolonged out-of-range exposure. Reassess the position if fee generation falls materially while volume no longer supports the current 84.5%.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 84.5% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 61.3% | — | — |
| Volume | $44.41K | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $80.77 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#4 of 11 SOL-SPCXx pools
by AI Farmer Score
#429 of 20718 on orca-whirlpool
by AI Farmer Score
Top 3% of all Solana pools
overall rank #3241 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-SPCXx liquidity pool on Orca Whirlpool. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPCXX into a shared trading pool and earning part of the fees paid by swaps. Your holdings can change toward one token as prices move, and the value of your position can fall relative to simply holding both tokens.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
SOL-SPCXX reports 61.3% from trading fees and 23.2% from rewards, producing total APR of 84.5%. 73% of yield comes from fees. The data does not establish a reward-emission timetable, so future APR should be modeled primarily as a function of volume, liquidity, fee tier, and the pool's ability to retain trading flow.
shieldRisk Assessment
A recent seven-day impermanent-loss reading and tick-in-range history are not available, so recent price divergence and range efficiency cannot be quantified from these metrics. As a MEMECOIN pool, SOL-SPCXX carries elevated token-specific volatility, liquidity, and attention-decay risk; emission decay is not the current main risk because reward yield is absent, but memecoin volume can contract quickly and fee income can fall with it. Exit timing should account for declining activity and the possibility that a position becomes exposed outside its selected range.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established asset in this pair and generally has deeper liquidity across Solana than SPCXX. SOL price moves relative to SPCXX determine the inventory shift and impermanent loss for the LP, while SOL's broader market liquidity can make its side of the position easier to rebalance.
tollSPCXx Context
SPCXX is the memecoin side of the pair, so its external liquidity, holder concentration, and attention cycle are important to LP outcomes. A sharp SPCXX move against SOL can push a concentrated position out of range and leave the LP holding more of the weaker-performing asset after rebalancing or withdrawal.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and SPCXX into a shared trading pool and earning part of the fees paid by swaps. Your holdings can change toward one token as prices move, and the value of your position can fall relative to simply holding both tokens.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CN32jwmQBFHM4NYrgkxefihRK8boR8M9n4RUBvgLe816
- Protocol
- Orca Whirlpool
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Whirlpool (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- SPCXx (Xs3oZwbH…)
- Created
- 6/24/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
APR
61%
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll orca-whirlpool poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current yield is fee-based: 61.3% comes from trading fees and 23.2% comes from rewards, for total APR of 84.5%. Emission decay is therefore not currently reducing the reported reward component, but any future incentive program could decline over time.
Current yield is fee-based: 61.3% comes from trading fees and 23.2% comes from rewards, for total APR of 84.5%. Emission decay is therefore not currently reducing the reported reward component, but any future incentive program could decline over time.
The current reward component is 23.2%, so the reported yield already comes from fees at 61.3% and remains 84.5% in total. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only the reward portion would disappear; fee income would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
The current reward component is 23.2%, so the reported yield already comes from fees at 61.3% and remains 84.5% in total. If incentives are introduced and later expire, only the reward portion would disappear; fee income would still depend on trading volume and liquidity.
The main risks are SPCXX price volatility, changing liquidity, concentrated-range exposure, and rapid declines in memecoin trading activity. The pool currently shows 0.91x volume relative to TVL and 73% fee-funded yield, but neither metric prevents impermanent loss or a fall in future fees.
The main risks are SPCXX price volatility, changing liquidity, concentrated-range exposure, and rapid declines in memecoin trading activity. The pool currently shows 0.91x volume relative to TVL and 73% fee-funded yield, but neither metric prevents impermanent loss or a fall in future fees.
Consider exiting when SPCXX liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when price reaches the edge of your range, or when fee income no longer compensates for the position's risks. For SOL-SPCXX, a sustained drop in volume or TVL would be a stronger exit signal than a single volatile price move.
Consider exiting when SPCXX liquidity or trading activity deteriorates, when price reaches the edge of your range, or when fee income no longer compensates for the position's risks. For SOL-SPCXX, a sustained drop in volume or TVL would be a stronger exit signal than a single volatile price move.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant offset is the fee stream, currently represented by 61.3%, but that annualized figure can change quickly with volume, price movement, and range placement.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable. The relevant offset is the fee stream, currently represented by 61.3%, but that annualized figure can change quickly with volume, price movement, and range placement.
