SOL-ECORon Raydium CLMMCLMM
- Chain
- Solana
- TVL
- TVL $61.15K
- APR
- 0.7% APR
- 24h Volume
- $297.11 24h vol
- Fee tier
- 0.25% fee
- Pool address
- CU6uiwj6…6n5s · observed 2026-07-26
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, below the Enter threshold of 15/100 and Hold threshold of 20/100, while the Exit threshold is 80/100. The live verdict is EXIT: the AI engine says hold, but the scanner is CRITICAL and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed, indicating that the score is being driven by weak activity, memecoin risk, and insufficient confirmation from other signals rather than by reward support. The pool ranks #567 of 1157 raydium-clmm pools, so it is not at the very bottom of the ranking but still does not meet the stated entry or hold thresholds. A sustained increase in fee-producing volume, deeper TVL, improved scanner status, or verifiable rewards could change the assessment; a TVL drain or further yield collapse would reinforce it.
Computed 2026-07-23 21:17 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$61.15K
Total value locked
$297.11
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up0.7%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
≈ -1.3%
adjusted · net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Use a deliberately narrow range centered on the current SOL-ECOR price only if you can monitor it frequently, and exit if the scanner remains CRITICAL or the pool's fee-generating volume stops supporting the position; do not leave a passive position through a sustained ECOR liquidity drain.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Fee APR | 0.7% | — | — |
| Volume | $297.11 | — | — |
| Fees Earned | $0.74 | — | — |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics — not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 1 SOL-ECOR pools
by AI Farmer Score
#309 of 7739 on raydium-clmm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #2521 of 68818
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the SOL-ECOR liquidity pool on Raydium CLMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ECOR into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can lose value relative to simply holding the tokens if their prices move apart, and ECOR may be harder to sell than SOL.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
Yield consists of fee-only APR of 0.7% and reward-only APR of 0.0%, with 100% of the total coming from trading fees. Reward dependency is not established, so the quoted yield should not be treated as secured by a known emissions schedule. With rewards contributing no current APR, fee generation depends on trading activity relative to the pool's liquidity.
shieldRisk Assessment
A usable seven-day impermanent-loss reading is not available, and recent tick-in-range exposure is also not reported, so price-path and range-utilization risk cannot be quantified from those measures. As a MEMECOIN pool, ECOR introduces substantial token-specific repricing and liquidity risk alongside SOL exposure. Emission decay is an additional family risk if incentives are introduced later, while exit timing matters because liquidity and trading activity can deteriorate before an LP can rebalance or close efficiently.
tollSOL Context
SOL is the established base asset in this pool and generally has substantially deeper liquidity across Solana markets than ECOR. SOL price movements relative to ECOR change the pool composition and can create impermanent loss for LPs even when SOL itself remains liquid elsewhere. A sharp SOL move can also push the position outside a selected range.
tollECOR Context
ECOR is the memecoin side of the pair, so its price and available exit liquidity are more dependent on this pool and other limited venues than SOL's. ECOR appreciation or collapse relative to SOL changes the LP's asset mix and may produce impermanent loss or difficult exits. Thin ECOR liquidity can amplify slippage when the position is rebalanced or withdrawn.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing SOL and ECOR into a shared pool so other users can swap between them, while you receive a share of trading fees. You can lose value relative to simply holding the tokens if their prices move apart, and ECOR may be harder to sell than SOL.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CU6uiwj6RQZgMLqPT3iJtnUb47d5y6jdYeR3jNdW6n5s
- Protocol
- Raydium CLMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- —
- Pool Type
- Concentrated Liquidity (CLMM)
- Token A
- SOL (So111111…)
- Token B
- ECOR (6wQDzAZT…)
- Created
- 4/20/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools — Same Protocol
open_in_newView all raydium-clmm pools →By Protocol
hubAll raydium-clmm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
⚠️ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the quoted 0.7% is currently driven by fee-only APR of 0.7%. If emissions are added and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
Current reward-only APR is 0.0%, so the quoted 0.7% is currently driven by fee-only APR of 0.7%. If emissions are added and then decay, the reward component would fall while fee income would still depend on trading volume.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted APR, so expiry would not reduce the present reward component below 0.0%. The position would rely on fee-only APR of 0.7%, which is supported by 100% fee sustainability and may weaken if volume falls.
There is no current reward contribution in the quoted APR, so expiry would not reduce the present reward component below 0.0%. The position would rely on fee-only APR of 0.7%, which is supported by 100% fee sustainability and may weaken if volume falls.
Risk is elevated because ECOR can reprice sharply, its external liquidity may be limited, and the pool has a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio. SOL's deeper markets do not remove ECOR-specific price, slippage, or exit risk, and recent impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool.
Risk is elevated because ECOR can reprice sharply, its external liquidity may be limited, and the pool has a 0.00x volume-to-liquidity ratio. SOL's deeper markets do not remove ECOR-specific price, slippage, or exit risk, and recent impermanent-loss history is not available for this pool.
For SOL-ECOR, an exit rule is justified while the live verdict is EXIT, the scanner is CRITICAL, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Consider closing or reducing exposure if TVL drains, fee-generating volume weakens, ECOR liquidity deteriorates, or the position moves outside its managed range.
For SOL-ECOR, an exit rule is justified while the live verdict is EXIT, the scanner is CRITICAL, and the strong EXIT signal is unopposed. Consider closing or reducing exposure if TVL drains, fee-generating volume weakens, ECOR liquidity deteriorates, or the position moves outside its managed range.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. At the quoted 0.7%, recovery from price divergence would require sustained fee generation and stable relative prices; reward income does not currently add to that calculation because reward-only APR is 0.0%.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because seven-day impermanent-loss data is unavailable and fee income varies with volume. At the quoted 0.7%, recovery from price divergence would require sustained fee generation and stable relative prices; reward income does not currently add to that calculation because reward-only APR is 0.0%.
