Wealthville Score
Verdict EXIT Β· 70% confidence
new capital
keep position
urgency to leave
The Wealthville Score is 17/100, with Enter at 15/100, Hold at 20/100, and Exit at 80/100; the live verdict is EXIT and the stated driver is ai_engine=hold. Its rank of #1503 of 24532 raydium-amm pools places it above many listed pools by rank, but the score does not remove memecoin, liquidity, or volume risk. The assessment would change if TVL drained, fee APR collapsed, volume stopped supporting the current fee rate, or the pool's risk profile worsened; sustained fee generation and stable liquidity would support the current hold view.
Computed 2026-11-11 11:03 UTC from on-chain yield, liquidity-depth, and risk signals. Not financial advice.
Liquidityhelp
lock$74.98K
Total value locked
$5.67K
24h volume
Yieldhelp
trending_up6.2%
advertised APRFee yield, annualized
β -92.8%
adjusted Β· net of IL (est.)
My Position
account_balance_walletAI Verdict
Avoid
WealthVille AI evaluation verdict for this liquidity pool investment opportunity.
Set a predefined exit trigger at a one-quarter decline in TVL from $75K sustained for two consecutive daily checks, or exit sooner if fee generation no longer supports 6.0% after accounting for your expected price divergence.
syncAI analysis is refreshing in the background
Performance Breakdown
| Metric | 24h / Day | 7d / Week | 30d / Month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total APR | 6.2% | β | β |
| Fee APR | 6.0% | β | β |
| Volume | $5.67K | β | β |
| Fees Earned | $14.19 | β | β |
Data sourced from Raydium Protocol, Birdeye, and DexScreener. Updated every snapshot cycle.
Efficiency Metrics
ComputedDeterministic efficiency metrics computed from on-chain data for this liquidity pool. All values are calculated directly from pool analytics β not AI-generated.
Pool Rankings
#1 of 2 π-BP pools
by AI Farmer Score
#2137 of 99294 on raydium-amm
by AI Farmer Score
Top 4% of all Solana pools
overall rank #5198 of 157883
How This Pool Works
Beginner FriendlyThis page provides real-time AI analytics and performance data for the π-BP liquidity pool on Raydium AMM. Data is sourced from on-chain Solana activity, Birdeye, DexScreener, and CoinGecko.
Providing liquidity here means depositing π and BP into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the tokens can leave your deposit worth less than simply holding both.
Pool Analysis
trending_upYield Source Breakdown
The yield decomposes into 6.0% fee APR and 0.2% reward APR. 97% of stated yield comes from trading fees, so APR depends on trading activity rather than farm emissions. Reward duration is not established, and there is currently no reward component contributing to the quoted APR.
shieldRisk Assessment
Recent impermanent-loss history and tick-in-range data are not reported, so recent price-divergence and range-management outcomes cannot be quantified. As a MEMECOIN pool, π-BP can experience sharp, asymmetric moves that leave an LP holding more of the weaker token after rebalancing. Emission decay is not currently reducing the quoted yield because rewards contribute nothing, but exit timing still matters if volume, liquidity, or token attention deteriorates.
tollπ Context
π is one side of the pair and its price movement determines how the pool reallocates the deposited assets. Liquidity depth for π elsewhere is not provided, so its external execution quality cannot be compared here. If π rises or falls sharply against BP, the LP position will generally hold less of the outperforming token and more of the underperforming one.
tollBP Context
BP is the other side of the pair and provides the reference asset against which π price movement is realized inside the pool. Its liquidity depth elsewhere is not established by the supplied metrics. A sharp BP move relative to π can create the same rebalancing effect and may make fee income insufficient to offset price divergence.
lightbulbSimple Explanation
Providing liquidity here means depositing π and BP into the pool so other users can trade between them. You receive a share of trading fees, but large price differences between the tokens can leave your deposit worth less than simply holding both.
Token Details
Pool Details
- Pool Address
- CW5jBQCAw9btDETXs2hZsDUNHYAaXpx9mgKfzYimsebh
- Protocol
- Raydium AMM
- Chain
- solana
- Fee Tier
- β
- Pool Type
- AMM
- Token A
- π (ZesMGYmoβ¦)
- Token B
- BP (BPxxfRCXβ¦)
- Created
- 9/7/2026
Explore More
Similar Pools β Same Protocol
APR
0%
APR
0%
APR
19%
APR
0%
By Protocol
hubAll raydium-amm poolsarrow_forwardBlockchain
dnsAll Solana poolsarrow_forwardNon-Custodial
Your funds are never held by WealthVille. All positions are on-chain.
Verified Data Sources
Raydium, Birdeye, DexScreener, CoinGecko, LlamaYield
AI-Powered Analysis
Proprietary scoring model trained on historical Solana DeFi data
β οΈ WealthVille AI analytics are for informational purposes only. APR, TVL, and AI scores are based on historical and real-time data and do not constitute financial advice. DeFi investments carry significant risk including impermanent loss and smart contract risk. Always do your own research.
Frequently Asked Questions
Emission decay currently has no direct effect on the quoted split because 0.2% is zero and 6.0% supplies the stated APR. If rewards are added later, decay would reduce the reward component without necessarily changing fee income.
Emission decay currently has no direct effect on the quoted split because 0.2% is zero and 6.0% supplies the stated APR. If rewards are added later, decay would reduce the reward component without necessarily changing fee income.
There is no current reward component to expire: 0.2% is zero and 6.0% is the source of the stated yield. If temporary incentives are introduced and later removed, only that reward portion would disappear; trading fees would depend on ongoing volume.
There is no current reward component to expire: 0.2% is zero and 6.0% is the source of the stated yield. If temporary incentives are introduced and later removed, only that reward portion would disappear; trading fees would depend on ongoing volume.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because both assets can move sharply and liquidity can thin quickly. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range data are not reported, so the pool's recent loss and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied metrics.
Risk is high relative to a stable or major-token pair because both assets can move sharply and liquidity can thin quickly. Recent impermanent-loss and tick-range data are not reported, so the pool's recent loss and range behavior cannot be measured from the supplied metrics.
Use predefined conditions rather than waiting for a visible collapse: reassess if TVL falls materially from $75K, fee income no longer supports 6.0%, or trading activity weakens enough to undermine the current fee-based APR. Exit timing is especially important when token attention or liquidity is fading.
Use predefined conditions rather than waiting for a visible collapse: reassess if TVL falls materially from $75K, fee income no longer supports 6.0%, or trading activity weakens enough to undermine the current fee-based APR. Exit timing is especially important when token attention or liquidity is fading.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unpredictable. As a rough gross-fee reference, recovery depends on 6.0% continuing long enough to offset the realized loss, before compounding, withdrawals, and further price movement.
A reliable break-even period cannot be calculated because recent impermanent-loss history is unavailable and price divergence is unpredictable. As a rough gross-fee reference, recovery depends on 6.0% continuing long enough to offset the realized loss, before compounding, withdrawals, and further price movement.
